ARTICLES
Oct 1, 2004

Selection of the Appropriate Aggregation Function for Calculating Leachate Pollution Index

Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 8, Issue 4

Abstract

A technique to quantify the leachate pollution potential of landfills on a comparative scale using an index known as the Leachate Pollution Index (LPI) has been developed and reported elsewhere. The LPI is a quantitative tool by which the leachate pollution data of the landfill sites can be reported uniformly. It is an increasing scale index and has been formulated based on the Delphi technique. The formulation process involved selecting variables, deriving weights for the selected pollutant variables, formulating their subindices curves, and finally aggregating the pollutant variables to arrive at the LPI. The aggregation function is one of the most important steps in calculating any environmental index. If the aggregation function is ambiguous, the result will raise an unnecessary alarm, indicating a comparatively less polluted environmental situation as more contaminated. Similarly, if the aggregation function is eclipsed, a false sense of security may be created, indicating a highly polluted environmental situation as less polluted. In this paper, the concept of LPI is described in brief and the various possible aggregation functions are described and used to calculate LPI values for an actual landfill site to select the most appropriate aggregation function. Based on the results, it is concluded that the weighted linear sum aggregation function is the best possible aggregation function for calculating LPI. Sensitivity analysis of the six short-listed aggregation functions is performed to substantiate this conclusion.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Babcock, L.R., Jr., and Nagda, L.N. ( 1972). “Indices of air quality.” Indicators of environmental quality, W. A. Thomas, ed., Plenum, New York.
2.
Bisselle, C.C., Lubore, S.H., and Pikul, R.P. ( 1972). “National environmental indices: air quality and outdoor recreation.” Rep. No. MTR 6159, MITRE Corporation McLean, Va.
3.
Brown, R.M., McClelland, N.I., Deininger, R.A., and Tozer, R.A. ( 1970). “A water quality index—do we dare?” Water Sewage Works, October, 339–343.
4.
Chian, E. S. K., and DeWalle, F. B. (1976). “Sanitary landfill leachates and their treatment.” J. Environ. Eng. Div. (Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.), 102(2), 411–431.
5.
Dee, N., Baker, J., Drobny, N., and Duke, K. (1973). “An environmental evaluation system for water resource planning.” Water Resour. Res., 9(3), 523–535.
6.
Dinius, S. H. (1972). “Social accounting system for evaluating water resources.” Water Resour. Res., 8(5), 1159–1177.
7.
Giljanovic, N. S. (1999). “Water quality evaluation by index in Dalmatia.” Water Res., 33(16), 3423–3440.
8.
Hammond, A., and Adriaanse, A. ( 1995). Environmental indicators: a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in context of sustainable development, World Resource Institute, Washington, D.C.
9.
Harkins, R. D. (1974). “An objective water quality index.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 46(3), 588–591.
10.
Horton, R. K. (1965). “An index-number system for rating water quality.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 37(3), 300–306.
11.
Inhaber, H. (1974). “A set of suggested air quality indices for Canada.” Atmos. Environ., 9, 353–364.
12.
Inhaber, H. (1975). “An approach to a water quality index for Canada.” Water Res., 9, 821–833.
13.
Jollands, N., Lermit, J., and Patterson, M. ( 2003). “The usefulness of aggregate indicators in policy making and evaluation: a discussion with application to eco-efficiency indicators in new zealand.” 〈http://een.anu.edu.au/wsprgpap/papers/jolland1.pdf〉 (May 2003).
14.
Kumar, D., and Alappat, B.J. ( 2003). “A technique to quantify landfill leachate pollution.” Proc., 9th Int. Landfill Symposium, 243–244.
15.
Landwehr, J.M. ( 1974). “Water quality indices—construction and analysis.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
16.
Landwehr, J. M., and Deininger, R. A. (1976). “A comparison of several water quality indexes.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 48(5), 954–958.
17.
Lo, I. M. C. (1996). “Characteristics and treatment of leachates from domestic landfills.” Environ. Int., 22(4), 433–442.
18.
Masters, G.M. ( 1998). Introduction to environmental engineering and science, Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi, India.
19.
National Productivity Council (NPC. (2003). “Environmental assessment of sanitary landfill, Okhla, New Delhi, India.” Interim Rep., New Delhi, India.
20.
Ott, W.R. ( 1978). Environmental indices: theory and practice, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Mich.
21.
Prati, L. R. P., and Pesarin, F. (1971). “Assessment of surface water quality by a single index of pollution.” Water Res., 5, 741–751.
22.
Smith, D. G. (1990). “A better water quality indexing system for rivers and streams.” Water Res., 24(10), 1237–1244.
23.
Swamee, P. K., and Tyagi, A. (1999). “Formulation of an air pollution index.” J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 49, 88–91.
24.
“Municipal solid waste (management and handling) rules.” (2000). The Gazette of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
25.
Truett, J. B., Johnson, A. C., Rowe, W. D., Feigner, K. D., and Manning, L. J. (1975). “Development of water quality management indices.” Water Resour. Bull., 11(3), 436–448.
26.
U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). ( 2000). “Indicators of sustainable development: framework and methodologies.” Background Paper No. 3, 9th Session of Commission on Sustainable Development, 〈http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/info.htm#bgdocs〉 (May 27, 2003).
27.
Walski, T. M., and Parker, F. L. (1974). “Consumers water quality index.” J. Environ. Eng. Div. (Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.), 100(3), 593–611.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 8Issue 4October 2004
Pages: 253 - 264

History

Published online: Oct 1, 2004
Published in print: Oct 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dinesh Kumar
Research Scholar, Indo-French Unit for Water and Waste Technologies, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi–110 016, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Babu J. Alappat
Assistant Professor, Indo-French Unit for Water and Waste Technologies, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi–110 016, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share