Phytoremediation—The Natural Pump-and-Treat and Hydraulic Barrier System
Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 4, Issue 2
Abstract
The use of “water-loving” trees as a supplemental remedy to conventional ground-water “pump-and-treat” systems was employed at a chemical manufacturing site in Texas. The approach entailed taking advantage of the extensive root systems of trees to extract contaminated ground water from the uppermost ground-water bearing zone located 30–35 ft below ground surface (bgs). Forty poplar and mulberry trees were planted along the southeastern property line of this site in order to control, stop, and/or retreat the contaminant plume from migrating off-site. This planting project, phytofence, is intended to complement and fortify the operation of an existing 10-well recovery system within that vicinity. The uptake of water by the mature trees in the future is expected to change the subsurface hydraulic gradient and create an adequate ground-water capture zone. In order to protect the underground utilities' piping networks from the tree roots near the ground surface, 10-in. HDPE casings that are 5 1/2 ft long were driven into the ground to surround each plant. This should also induce a deeper growth into the affected area.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chappell, J. (1998). “Phytoremediation of TCE in groundwater using Populus.” Status Rep. prepared through National Network for Environmental Management Studies (NNEMS) by Duke University, for the U.S. EPA Technology Innovation Office (TIO) (compiled June–Aug., 1997).
2.
Fletcher, J., McFarlane, C., and Pfleeger, T. (1990). “Effect, uptake and disposition of nitrobenzene in several terrestrial plants.” Envir. Technol. and Chem., 9, 513–520.
3.
Gatliff, E. G. (1991). “Vegetative remediation process offers advantages over traditional pump-and-treat technologies.” Remediation, 4(3), 343–352.
4.
Matso, K. (1995). “Mother nature's pump and treat.” Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 65(10), 46–49.
5.
Newman, L. A. et al. (1997). “Uptake and biotransformation of trichloroethylene by hybrid poplars.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 31(4), 1062–1067.
6.
“Phytoremediation: Poplar vs. pollution.” (1998). USA Today, Oct. 5.
7.
Stack, T. M., Potter, S. T., and Suthersan, S. S. (1999). “Putting down roots.” Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 69(4), 46–49.
8.
Strand, S. E. et al. (1995). “Removal of trichloroethylene from aquifers using trees.” Conference Proc., Conf. Innovative Technol. for Site Remediation and Haz. Waste Mgmt., American Soc. of Civil Engineers, New York, 605–612.
9.
Wright, A. G., and Roe, A. (1997). “It's back to nature for waste cleanup.” Engrg. News Rec., 238(17).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • April 2000
Pages: 73 - 77
History
Received: Dec 8, 1999
Published online: Apr 1, 2000
Published in print: Apr 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.