Regression Models for Dynamic Properties of Highly Organic Soils
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 4
Abstract
Regression models are presented for the dynamic properties of highly organic soils. The models are based on a database of triaxial and resonant-column/torsional-shear cyclic loading tests on thin walled tube samples mainly retrieved from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The soils in this database range from highly fibrous peat to amorphous organic clays with organic contents (OC) ranging from 14–81%, water contents ranging from 88–495%, total densities ranging from , and effective consolidation stresses ranging from . The secant shear modulus and equivalent damping ratio were modeled as variables dependent on the shear strain amplitude , consolidation stress , and OC. The residuals of the regression models were analyzed against other predictor variables including undisturbed density , loading frequency , and number of loading cycles . A regression model for was developed, and conditional probabilities were used to improve the estimation of and when measurements were available. The database of in situ measurements of shear wave velocity was used to adjust the regression model for in situ conditions. Variances and correlations in the regression models are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the California Department of Water Resources (CDWR), State of California. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the writers and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the State of California. The above support and assistance is greatly appreciated.
References
Arulnathan, R. (2000). “Dynamic properties and site response of organic soils.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, Calif.
ASTM. (2005a). “Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System).” D 2487-00, Vol. 04.08, American Society of Testing and Materials, 249–260.
ASTM. (2005b). “Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils.” D 2974-00, Vol. 04.08, American Society of Testing and Materials, 332–335.
Boulanger, R. W., Arulnathan, R., Harder, L. F., Jr., Torres, R. A., and Driller, M. W. (1998). “Dynamic properties of Sherman Island peat.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(1), 12–20.
California (1992). “Seismic stability evaluation of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta levees.” Phase I Rep.: Preliminary Evaluations and Review of Previous Studies, Division of Design and Construction, California Dept. of Water Resources.
Díaz-Rodríguez, J. A., and Santamarina, J. C. (2001). “Mexico City soil behavior at different strains: Observations and physical interpretation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 127(9), 783–789.
Ishihara, K. (1996). Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, U.K.
Kishida, T., Boulanger, R. W., Wehling, T. M., and Driller, M. W. (2006). “Variation of small strain stiffness for peat and organic soil.” Proc., 8th U.S. National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Paper No. 1057.
Kokusho, T. (1980). “Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range.” Soils Found., 20(2), 45–60.
Kokusho, T., Yoshida, Y., and Esashi, Y. (1982). “Dynamic properties of soft clay for wide strain range.” Soils Found., 22(4), 1–18.
Kramer, S. L. (2000). “Dynamic response of Mercer Slough peat.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 126(6), 504–510.
Landva, A. O., Korpijaakko, E. O., and Pheeney, P. E. (1983). “Geotechnical classification of peats and organic soils.” Testing of peats and organic soils, ASTM STP 820, P. M. Jarrett, ed., American Society of Testing and Materials, 37–51.
Mesri, G., and Ajlouni, M. (2007). “Engineering properties of fibrous peats.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 133(7), 850–866.
Mitchell, J. K., and Soga, K. (2005). Fundamentals of soil behavior, Wiley, New York.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1970). “Analyses of ground motions at Union Bay, Seattle during earthquakes and distant nuclear blasts.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 60(1), 125–136.
Silver, M. L., and Seed, H. B. (1971). “Deformation characteristics of sands under cyclic loading.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 97(8), 1081–1098.
Stokoe, K. H., II, Bay, J. A., Rosenbald, B. L., Hwang, S. K., and Twede, M. R. (1994). “In situ seismic and dynamic laboratory measurements of geotechnical materials at Queensboro Bridge and Roosevelt Island.” Geotechnical Engineering Rep. No. GR94-5, Civil Engineering Dept., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Tokimatsu, K., and Sekiguchi, T. (2007). “Effects of dynamic properties of peat on strong ground motions during 2004 mid Niigata prefecture earthquake.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Paper No. 1531.
Viggiani, G., and Atkinson, J. H. (1995). “Stiffness of fine-grained soil at very small strains.” Geotechnique, 45(2), 249–265.
Vucetic, M., and Dobry, R. (1991). “Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 117(1), 89–107.
Wehling, T. M., Boulanger, R. W., Arulnathan, R., Harder, L. F., and Driller, M. W. (2003). “Nonlinear dynamic properties of a fibrous organic soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 129(10), 929–939.
Wehling, T. M., Boulanger, R. W., Harder, L. F., Jr., and Driller, M. W. (2001). “Dynamic properties of Sherman Island peat: Phase II study.” Rep. No. UCD/CGM-01/01, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Univ. of California, Davis, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 8, 2007
Accepted: Jul 1, 2008
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.