Measuring Soil Pressure on a Buried Model Structure for the Validation of Quantitative Frameworks
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 6
Abstract
The paper presents the methodologies and results of an experimental study aimed at measuring the soil contact pressures which develop on a buried structure as it interacts with the surrounding soil under load. The study has been based on measurements made on model structures tested in a pressure chamber filled with a fine uniform sand. The buried model structure was a very rigid right cylinder designed such that it could be fitted with roofs of different thicknesses. The structure bottom and roof were instrumented with newly designed and constructed soil pressure cells based on the null response concept. The device is unaffected by the issues that affect the use of traditional soil pressure cells. The development of pressure on the structure was measured as uniform pressure was applied to the soil surface. The results illustrate the effect of roof stiffness on the development of pressure at the roof center. The midroof pressure was seen to increase with roof stiffness, however the development of pressure was also seen to be dependent upon the actual deflection. In the case of a flexible roof it was seen that the development of contact pressure is a nonlinear function of the pressure applied at the soil surface and is highly dependent upon stress history. In contrast, it was seen that pressure on a stiff roof develops as a linear function of pressure applied at the soil surface and is less dependent of stress history. The results of the model tests together with soil stiffness data supplied in the paper will be useful in the calibration and validation of numerical and analytical frameworks.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this project was provided by the Israeli Housing Ministry.
References
Abbott, P. A. (1967). “Arching for vertically buried prismatic structures.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 93(SM5), 233–255.
Allgood, J. R. (1964). “The behavior of shallow buried cylinders.” Proc. of Symp. on Soil Structure Interaction, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz., 195–200.
Brachman, R. W. I., Moore, I. D., and Rowe, R. K. (2001). “The performance of a laboratory facility for evaluating the structural response of small-diameter buried pipes.” Can. Geotech. J., 38, 260–275.
Chen, H. L., and Chen, S. E. (1996). “Dynamic responses of shallow-buried flexible plates subjected to impact loading.” J. Struct. Eng., 122(1), 55–60.
Dancygier, A. N., Karinski, Y. S., and Levithan, I. (2003). “An analytical model to predict static contact pressure on a buried structure.” Eng. Struct., 25(1), 91–101.
Doebelin, E. O. (1990). Measurement systems: Application and design, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Dunnicliff, J. (1988). Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance, Wiley, New York.
Getzler, Z., Gellert, M., and Eitan, R. (1970). “Analysis of arching pressure in ideal elastic soil.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 96(SM4), 1357–1372.
Getzler, Z., Komornik, A., and Mazurik, A. (1968). “Model study on arching above buried structures.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 94(SM5), 1123–1141.
Iglesia, G. R., Einstein, H. H., Whitman, R. V., Jessberger, H. L., and Guttler, U. (1991). “Trapdoor experiments with simulated jointed rock.” Centrifuge 91, Balkema, Rotterdam, 561–567.
Ingram, J. K. (1968). “Development of a free-field soil stress gage for static and dynamic measurements.” Technical Rep. No. 1-814, Defense Atomic Support Agency, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
Kim, K., and Yoo, C. H. (2005). “Design loading on deeply buried box culverts.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131(1), 20–27.
Lambe, T. W. (1973). “Predictions in soil engineering.” Geotechnique, 2, 149–202.
Moore, I. (1987). “Response of buried cylinders to surface loads.” J. Geotech. Engrg., 113(1), 758–773.
Nawatha, H. (2003). “A study of the behaviour and strength of undisturbed sand samples in drained triaxial tests.” MSc thesis, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Newmark, N. M. (1964). “The basis of current criteria for the design of underground protective structure.” Proc. Symp. on Soil Structure Interaction, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz. 14–16.
Nowack, A. S., Park, C., and Ojala, P. (2001). “Calibration of design code for buried structures.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 28, 574–582.
Savin, G. N. (1962). Stress concentration around holes, Pergamon, New York, 1–430.
Selig, E. T. (1980). “Soil stress gage calibration.” Geotech. Test. J., 3(4), 153–158.
Stone, K. J., and Newson, T. A. (2002). “Arching effects in soil-structure interaction.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. Physical Modelling in Geomechanics, St. Johns, Newfoundland, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 935–939.
Szechy, K. (1973). The art of tunneling, 2nd Ed., Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary, 891.
Talesnick, M. (2005). “Measuring soil contact pressure on a solid boundary and quantifying soil arching.” Geotech. Test. J., 28(2), 171–179.
Taylor, D. W. (1947). Pressure distribution theories, earth pressure cell investigations, and pressure distribution data, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vickburg, Miss.
Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical soil mechanics, Wiley, New York, 66–76.
Timoshenko, S. (1959). Theory of plates and shells, McGraw-Hill, New York, 47–49, 404–412.
Weiler, W. A., and Kulhawy, F. H. (1982). “Factors affecting stress cell measurements in soil.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 108(GT12), 1529–1548.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 17, 2007
Accepted: Oct 2, 2007
Published online: Jun 1, 2008
Published in print: Jun 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.