Three-Dimensional Hoek-Brown Strength Criterion for Rocks
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 9
Abstract
A great number of rock strength criteria have been proposed over the past decades. Of these different strength criteria, the Hoek-Brown strength criterion has been used most widely, because: (1) it has been developed specifically for rock materials and rock masses; (2) its input parameters can be determined from routine unconfined compression tests, mineralogical examination, and discontinuity characterization; and (3) it has been applied for over by practitioners in rock engineering, and has been applied successfully to a wide range of intact and fractured rock types. The Hoek-Brown strength criterion, however, does not take account of the influence of the intermediate principal stress, although much evidence has been accumulating to indicate that the intermediate principal stress does influence the rock strength in many instances. In this paper, a three-dimensional (3D) version of the Hoek-Brown strength criterion has been proposed. The original Hoek-Brown strength criterion is just a two-dimensional (2D) version of the proposed 3D strength criterion. The 3D strength criterion not only inherits the advantages of the original Hoek-Brown strength criterion, but can take account of the influence of the intermediate principal stress. Polyaxial or true triaxial compression test data of intact rocks and jointed rock masses has been collected from the published literature and used to validate the proposed 3D Hoek-Brown strength criterion. Predictions of the proposed 3D Hoek-Brown strength criterion are in good agreement with the test data for a range of different rock types. The proposed 3D Hoek-Brown strength criterion is also compared with a simplified 3D Hoek-Brown strength criterion proposed by Pan and Hudson. The Pan-Hudson criterion cannot be considered a true 3D version of the Hoek-Brown criterion, because it does not reduce to the form of the original Hoek-Brown criterion at either triaxial or biaxial state. The Pan-Hudson criterion underpredicts the strength at the triaxial state, but overpredicts the strength at the biaxial state.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Al-Ajmi, A. M., and Zimmerman, R. W. (2005). “Relation between the Mogi and the Coulomb failure criteria.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 42(3), 431–439.
Brown, E. T. (1993). “The nature and fundamentals of rock engineering.” Comprehensive rock engineering—Principle, practice, and projects, J. A. Hudson, ed., Pergamon, Oxford, U.K., 1, 1–23.
Chang, C., and Haimson, B. C. (2000). “True triaxial strength and deformability of the German continental deep drilling program (KTB) deep hole amphibolite.” J. Geophys. Res., 105, 8999–9013.
Colmenares, L. B., and Zoback, M. D. (2002). “A statistical evaluation of intact rock failure criteria constrained by polyaxial test data for five different rocks.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 39(6), 695–729.
Haimson, B. C., and Chang, C. (2000). “Anew true triaxial cell for testing mechanical properties of rock, and its use to determine rock strength and deformability of Westerly granite.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 37, 285–96.
Hoek, E. (2000). Rock engineering—Course notes by Evert Hoek, 2002 Ed., ⟨http://www.rocscience.com/hoek/PracticalRockEngineering.asp⟩.
Hoek, E., and Brown, E. T. (1980). “Empirical strength criterion for rock masses.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 106, 1013–1035.
Hoek, E., and Brown, E. T. (1988). “The Hoek-Brown criterion—A 1988 update.” Proc., 15th Can. Rock Mech. Symp., Univ. of Toronto, Canada, 31–38.
Hoek, E., and Brown, E. T. (1997). “Practical estimates of rock mass strength.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 34, 1165–1186.
Hoek, E., Carranza-Torres, C., and Corkum, B. (2002). “Hoek-Brown failure criterion.” Proc., 5th North American Rock Mech. Symp. and 17th Tunneling Assoc. of Canada Conf.: NARMS-TAC 2002. Mining Innovation and Tech., 2002 Ed., Hammah et al., eds., Toronto, 267–273.
Hoek, E., Kaiser, P. K., and Bawden, W. F. (1995). Support of underground excavations in hard rock, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lade, P. V. (1993). “Rock strength criteria: The theories and the evidence.” Comprehensive rock engineering—Principle, practice, and Projects. J. A. Hudson, ed., Pergamon, Oxford, U.K., 1, 255–284.
Lögters, G., and Voort, H. (1974). “In situ determination of the deformational behavior of a cubical rock mass under triaxial load.” Rock Mech., 6, 65–79.
Marinos, P., and Hoek, E. (2001). “Estimating the geotechnical properties of heterogeneous rock masses such as flysch.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 60, 85–92.
Mogi, K. (1971). “Fracture and flow of rocks under high triaxial compression.” J. Geophys. Res., 76(5), 1255–69.
Müller-Salzburg, L., and Ge, X. R. (1983). “Untersuchungen zum mechanischen verhallen geklüfteten gebirges unter wechsellasten.” Proc., 5th Cong. Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1, A43–49.
Pan, X. D., and Hudson, J. A. (1988). “A simplified three-dimensional Hoek-Brown yield criterion.” Rock Mechanics and Power Plants, M. Romana, ed., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 95–103.
Priest, S. D. (2005). “Determination of shear strength and three-dimensional yield strength for the Hoek-Brown yield criterion.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 38(4), 299–327.
Reik, G., and Zacas, M. (1978). “Strength and deformation characteristics of jointed media in true-triaxial compression.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr., 15(1), 295–303.
Singh, B., Goel, R. K., Meherotra, V. K., Garg, S. K., and Allu, M. R. (1998). “Effect of intermediate principal stress on strength of anisotropic rock mass.” Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 13(3), 71–79.
Takahashi, M., and Koide, H. (1989). “Effect of the intermediate principal stress on strength and deformation behavior of sedimentary rocks at the depth shallower than .” Rock at great depth, V. Maury and D. Fourmaintraux, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 19–26.
Tiwari, R. P., and Rao, K. S. (2004). “Physical modeling of a rock mass under a true triaxial stress state.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41(3), 433.
Wang, R., and Kemeny, J. M. (1995). “A new empirical criterion for rock under polyaxial compressive stresses.” Rock mechanics, Daemen and Schultz, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 453–458.
Zhang, L., and Einstein, H. H. (1998). “End bearing capacity of drilled shafts in rock.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(7), 574–584.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 133 • Issue 9 • September 2007
Pages: 1128 - 1135
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 7, 2005
Accepted: Jan 2, 2007
Published online: Sep 1, 2007
Published in print: Sep 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.