Factors Affecting Portable Falling Weight Deflectometer Measurements
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 6
Abstract
Lower cost and better quality evaluations of pavement characteristics require precise quality assurance/control programs that relate test results to design practice. Rapid in situ stiffness testing enables transportation agencies to conduct reliable and defensible quality assurance programs. This study explores the feasibility of using a portable falling weight deflectometer (PFWD) to characterize pavement layer moduli. Efforts were made to investigate factors that may influence PFWD results. Field dynamic cone penetrometer as well as laboratory California bearing ratio tests were performed and compared with results obtained from PFWD. One of the most important factors concerning the PFWD modulus is the size of the PFWD loading plate. Our testing suggests that an appropriate plate size can be chosen from the measured modulus. The effects of drop height on PFWD moduli were found to be small as the moduli remained about the same regardless of the drop heights. Considering the personnel and skills required for data collection, result interpretation, speed of testing, and the quality of data produced, the PFWD is preferred. PFWD is an ideal device for quality control during compaction monitoring because it enables a rapid stiffness assessment of individual pavement layers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was partly supported by the National Science Council of Republic of China (Grant No. NSC93–2211–E–214–009). The writers wish to thank Professor H. Y. Wang, Professor H. L. Luo, and Dr. D. H. Chen for their consultations and discussions regarding this research.
References
Chen, D. H., Lin, D. F., Liau, P. H., and Bilyeu, J. (2005). “Developing a correlation between dynamic cone penetrometer data and pavement layer moduli.” Geotech. Test. J., 28(1), 42–49.
Fleming, P. R. (2001). “Field measurement of stiffness modulus for pavement foundation.” Transportation Research Board, 80th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., Paper No. 01-2145.
Fleming, P. R., Lambert, J. P., Frost, M. W., and Rogers, C. D. (2002). “In-situ assessment of stiffness modulus for highway foundations during construction.” 9th Int. Conf. on Asphalt Pavements, Copenhagen, Denmark (CD-ROM), 12.
Hoffmann, O. J.-M., Guzina, B. B., and Drescher, A. (2004). “Stiffness estimates using portable deflectometers.” Transportation Research Record No. 1869, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 59–66.
Livneh, M., and Goldberg, Y. (2001). “Use of falling-weight deflectometer and light drop-weight for quality assessment during road formation and foundation construction.” Transportation Research Board, 80th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., Paper No. 01–0106.
Livneh, M., Ishai, I., and Livneh, N. (1995). “Effect of vertical confinement on dynamic cone penetrometer strength values in pavement and subgrade evaluations.” Transportation Research Record No. 1473, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–8.
Siekmeier, J. A., Young, D., and Beberg, D. (2000). “Comparison of the dynamic cone penetrometer with other tests during subgrade and granular base characterization in Minnesota.” Nondestructive testing of pavements and backcalculation of moduli: third volume, ASTM STP 1375 S. D. Tayabji and E. O. Lukanen, eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, 175–188.
Uzan, J., Scullion, T., Michalak, C. H., Paredes, M., and Lytton, R. L. (1988). “A microcomputer based procedure for back-calculating layer moduli from FWD data.” Research Rep. 1123-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Highway Materials Division, College Station, Tex.
Webster, S. L., Grau, R. H., and Williams, R. P. (1992). “Description and application of dual mass dynamic cone penetrometer.” Instruction Rep., No. GL-92-3, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 132 • Issue 6 • June 2006
Pages: 804 - 808
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 28, 2004
Accepted: Nov 16, 2005
Published online: Jun 1, 2006
Published in print: Jun 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.