TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 1, 2006

Logistic Regression Model for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Probability Using CPT Data

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 6

Abstract

A simple model for evaluating liquefaction probability using cone penetration test (CPT) data is developed based on logistic regression analyses of 396 case histories. The proposed model uses the normalized cone penetration resistance and soil behavior type index as input parameters; therefore, only CPT testing is necessary for evaluating the liquefaction probability of a site. The selection of the model parameters and the expression of equations are based on results of probability examinations and rigorous statistical analyses. Moreover, the derivation of the logistic regression model is presented in a system of equations. The incorporation of these procedures in developing the model not only fully satisfies the statistic requirements but also highlights the physical meanings of the model parameters. Comparisons of the proposed probability model with previously proposed deterministic and probabilistic approaches are performed to demonstrate the improvements. For practical purposes, the developed model is implemented to establish the relationship between the factor of safety against liquefaction and the probability of liquefaction.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to thank many individuals from Taiwan for providing Chi Chi earthquake data. They also appreciate the reviewers for providing many precious comments that have sharpened and improved the quality of this paper.

References

Anderson, T. W. (2003). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Boulanger, R. W., and Idriss, I. M. (2004). “State normalization of penetration resistance and the effect of overburden stress on liquefaction resistance.” Proc., 11th SDEE and 3rd ICEGE Conf., Berkeley, Calif., 484–491.
Christian, J. T., and Swiger, W. F. (1975). “Statistics of liquefaction and SPT results.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 101(11), 1135–1150.
Cox, D. R. (1970). The analysis of binary data, Chapman and Hall, London.
Garson, D. (2003). “Logistic regression.” ⟨http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/logistic.htm
Horowitz, J. L. (1982). “Evaluation of usefulness of two standard goodness-of-fit indicators for comparing non-nested random utility model. Advances in trip generation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 874, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 19–25.
Johnson, R. A., and Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 5th Ed., Prentice–Hall, Upper Saddle River, N. J.
Juang, C. H., Chen, C. J., Jiang, T., and Andrus, R. D. (2000a). “Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests.” Can. Geotech. J., 37, 1195–1208.
Juang, C. H., Chen, C. J., Tang, W. H., and Rosowsky, D. V. (2000b). “CPT-based liquefaction analysis. Part I: Determination of limit state function.” Geotechnique, 50(5), 583–592.
Juang, C. H., Jiang, T., and Andrus, R. D. (2002). “Assessing probability-based methods for liquefaction potential evaluation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 128(7), 580–589.
Juang, C. H., Yuan, H., Lee, D. H., and Lin, P. S. (2003). “Simplified cone penetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 129(1), 66–80.
Lai, S. Y., Hsu, S. C., and Hsieh, M. J. (2004). “Discriminant model for evaluating soil liquefaction potential using core penetration test data.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 130(12), 1271–1282.
Lai, S. Y., Lee, F. B., and Hsieh, M. J. (1990). “Logistic regression models for evaluating soil liquefaction probability by Cone Penetration Tests.” J. Civil Hydraulic Eng., Taipei, Taiwan, 16(4), 35–48 (in Chinese).
Liao, S. S. C., Veneziano, D., and Whitman, R. V. (1988). “Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability.” J. Geotech. Eng., 114(4), 389–411.
Lin, P. S., Chang, T. S., and Chang, C. W. (2002). “The application of large penetration tests in the evaluation of gravelly soil liquefaction potential.” Proc., Conf. on Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Liquefaction Analysis on Chi-Chi Earthquake, Taichung, Taiwan, 121–124 (in Chinese).
Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis, 2nd Ed., Sage, London.
Moss, R. E. S., and Seed, R. B. (2004). “Probabilistic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction using the CPT.” Proc., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (11th ICSDEE) and 3rd Int. Conf. on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, (3rd ICEGE), Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Olsen, R. S. (1997). “Cyclic liquefaction based on the cone penetrometer test.” Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soil, T. L. Youd and I. M. Idriss, eds., NCEER-97-0022.
Robertson, P. K. (1990). “Soil classification using the cone penetration.” Can. Geotech. J., 27(1), 151–158.
Robertson, P. K., and Campanella, R. G. (1985). “Liquefaction potential of sand using the CPT.” J. Geotech. Eng., 111(3), 384–403.
Robertson, P. K., and Wride, C. E. (1998). “Evaluating cyclic liquefaction using the cone penetration.” Can. Geotech. J., 35, 442–459.
Seed, H. B., and De Alba, P. M. (1986). “Use of SPT and CPT tests for evaluating the liquefaction resistance of sands.” Proc., Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, New York, 281–302.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1971). “Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 97(9), 1249–1273.
Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., and Arango, I. (1983). “Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data.” J. Geotech. Eng., 109(3), 458–482.
Seed, H. B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L. F., and Chung, R. M. (1985). “Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluation.” J. Geotech. Eng., 111(12), 1425–1445.
Shibata, T., and Teparaksa, W. (1988). “Evaluation of liquefaction potentials of soil using Cone Penetration Tests.” Soils Found., 28(2), 49–60.
Stark, T. D., and Olson, S. M. (1995). “Liquefaction resistance using CPT and field case histories.” J. Geotech. Eng., 121(12), 856–869.
Toprak, S., Holzer, T. L., Bennett, M. J., and Tinsley, J. C. I. (1999). “CPT- and SPT-based probabilistic assessment of liquefactionpotential.” Proc., 7th U.S.–Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures Against Soil Liquefaction, MCEER, Seattle, 69–86.
Yoshimi, Y., Tokimatsu, K., and Ohara, J. (1994). “In situ liquefaction resistance of clean sands over a wide density range.” Geotechnique, 44(3), 479–494.
Youd, T. L., and Noble, S. K. (1997). “Liquefaction criteria based statistical and probabilistic analysis.” Proc., NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soil, NCEER-97-0022,State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.
Youd, T. L. et al. (2001). “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 127(10), 817–833.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 132Issue 6June 2006
Pages: 694 - 704

History

Received: Sep 10, 2004
Accepted: Nov 15, 2005
Published online: Jun 1, 2006
Published in print: Jun 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sheng-Yao Lai [email protected]
Researcher, Harbor and Marine Technology Center, Institute of Transportation, Wuchi, Taichung County, Taiwan (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Wen-Jong Chang [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Chi Nan Univ., Puli, Nantou, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected]
Ping-Sien Lin [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, National Chung-Hsing Univ., Taichung, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share