Membrane Behavior of Two Backfills from Field-Constructed Soil-Bentonite Cutoff Walls
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 132, Issue 10
Abstract
Two soil-bentonite cutoff-wall backfills obtained from construction sites, one in New Jersey and one in Delaware, were tested for the existence of membrane behavior. Both backfills were designed as a mixture of dry bentonite (3–4% by dry weight) and the locally excavated soil blended with bentonite water slurry to provide slumps ranging from 100 to (from 4 to ). The results of the membrane tests indicate that both backfills exhibit membrane behavior. Further, the magnitude of the membrane behavior increases with decreasing void ratio. However, the magnitude of the increase in membrane behavior in these construction-site backfills was lower than that previously reported for model backfills prepared in the laboratory. The difference in the membrane behavior is attributed, in part, to a lower percentage of clay in the construction-site backfills relative to the model backfills. Nonetheless, based on the measured membrane efficiencies for the two field-constructed backfills, the total liquid flux through the cutoff walls can be expected to be reduced relative to that in the absence of membrane behavior by 1–10% for the cutoff wall in Delaware and 7–8% for the cutoff wall in New Jersey, depending on the void ratio. Thus, the results of this study suggest that membrane behavior in field-constructed cutoff walls can be significant, depending on the void ratio and the clay content of the backfill.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was part of a collaborative research effort between Colorado State University and Bucknell University. Financial support for the study was provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), Arlington, VA, under Grant No. NSFCMS-0099430. The opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the writers and are not necessarily consistent with the policies or opinions of the NSF.
References
Fritz, S. J. (1986). “Ideality of clay membranes in osmotic processes: A review.” Clays Clay Miner., 34(2), 214–223.
Fritz, S. J., and Marine, I. W. (1983). “Experimental support for a predictive osmotic model of clay membranes.” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 47(8), 1515–1522.
Keijzer, Th. J. S., Kleingeld, P. J., and Loch, J. P. G. (1999). “Chemical osmosis in compacted clayey material and the prediction of water transport.” Eng. Geol. (Amsterdam), 53(2), 151–159.
Kemper, W. D., and Quirk, J. P. (1972). “Ion mobilities and electric charge of external clay surfaces inferred from potential differences and osmotic flow.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 36(3), 426–433.
Kemper, W. D., and Rollins, J. B. (1966). “Osmotic efficiency coefficients across compacted clays.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 30(5), 529–534.
Malusis, M. A., and Shackelford, C. D. (2002). “Chemico-osmotic efficiency of a geosynthetic clay liner.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 128(2), 97–106.
Malusis, M. A., Shackelford, C. D., and Olsen, H. W. (2001). “A laboratory apparatus to measure chemico-osmotic efficiency coefficients for clay soils.” Geotech. Test. J., 24(3), 229–242.
Olsen, H. W. (1969). “Simultaneous fluxes of liquid and charge in saturated kaolinite.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 33(3), 338–344.
Rhodes, J. D. (1982). Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, Agronomy Monograph No. 9, ASA-SSSA, Madison, Wis.
Shackelford, C. D., and Lee, J.-M. (2003). “The destructive role of diffusion on clay membrane behavior.” Clays Clay Miner., 51(2), 187–197.
Shackelford, C. D., Malusis, M. A., and Olsen, H. W. (2001). “Clay membrane barriers for waste containment.” Geotech. News, 19(2), 39–43.
Shackelford, C. D., Malusis, M. A., and Olsen, H. W. (2003). “Clay membrane behavior for geoenvironmental containment.” Soil and Rock America Conf. 2003, Proc. of the Joint 12th Panamerican Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering and the 39th U.S. Rock Mechanics Symp., Vol. 1, P. J. Culligan, H. H. Einstein, and A. J. Whittle, eds., Verlag Glückauf GMBH, Essen, Germany, 767–774.
Yeo, S.-S. (2003). “Hydraulic conductivity, consolidation, and membrane behavior of model backfill-slurry mixtures for vertical cutoff walls.” M.S. thesis, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Yeo, S.-S., Shackelford, C. D., and Evans, J. C. (2005). “Membrane behavior of model soil-bentonite backfills.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131(4), 418–429.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 18, 2005
Accepted: Jan 22, 2006
Published online: Oct 1, 2006
Published in print: Oct 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.