Nonlinear Dynamic Properties of a Fibrous Organic Soil
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 129, Issue 10
Abstract
The nonlinear dynamic properties of a fibrous peaty organic soil beneath a levee in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta in California are described herein. Thin-walled tube samples were obtained from four locations between the levee crest and the free field such that the in situ vertical effective stresses ranged from about 12 kPa in the free field to about 135 kPa beneath the levee crest. The peaty organic soil was very soft and highly compressible in the free field with initial water contents of 236–588% and shear wave velocities of typically 22–27 m/s, and moderately firm beneath the levee crest with of 152–240% and of typically 88–129 m/s. Stress–strain measurements in a cyclic triaxial device showed that the normalized secant shear modulus and equivalent damping ratio (ξ) versus cyclic shear strain amplitude relations were dependent on the consolidation stress Tests involving prior overstraining followed by reconsolidation showed that the effects of sample disturbance were likely small. Stress history, creep, and loading frequency effects were also examined. Tests on reconstituted specimens provided supplementary data on the functional relation between maximum shear modulus and consolidation stress conditions. Summary relations are provided for and ξ versus and for versus
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Arulnathan, R. (2000). “Dynamic properties and site response of organic soils.” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, Calif.
Arulnathan, R., Boulanger, R. W., and Riemer, M. F.(1998). “Analysis of bender element tests.” Geotech. Test. J., 21(2), 120–131.
ASTM. (1999). “D 2974-87 (reapproved 1995): Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pa., 4.08, 288–290.
Boulanger, R. W., Arulnathan, R., Harder, L. F., Jr., Torres, R. A., and Driller, M. W.(1998). “Dynamic properties of Sherman Island peat.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(1), 12–20.
California Dept. of Water Resources (CDWR). (1992). “Seismic stability evaluation of the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta levees.” Phase I Report: Preliminary Evaluations and Review of Previous Studies, Division of Design and Construction, California Dept. of Water Resources, Sacramento, Calif.
California Dept. of Water Resources (CDWR). (1995). “Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta Atlas.” California Dept. of Water Resources, Sacramento, Calif.
Hardin, B. O. (1978). “The nature of stress-strain behavior for soils.” Proc., Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, ASCE, New York, 1, 3–90.
Idriss, I. M., Dobry, R., and Singh, R. D.(1978). “Nonlinear behavior of soft clays during cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 104(12), 1427–1447.
Isenhower, W. M., and Stokoe, K. H. (1981). “Strain-rate dependent shear modulus of San Francisco Bay mud.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Civil Engineering Dept., Univ. of Missouri–Rolla, Rolla, Mo., 597–602.
Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F., and Takagi, Y.(1978). “Shear moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading.” Soils Found., 18(1), 39–56.
Kramer, S. L. (1996). “Dynamic response of peats.” Final Research Rep. No. WA-RD 412.1, Washington State Transportation Center, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Kramer, S. L.(2000). “Dynamic response of Mercer Slough peat.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 126(6), 504–510.
Landva, A. O., Korpijaakko, E. O., and Pheeney, P. E. (1983). “Geotechnical classification of peats and organic soils.” Testing of peats and organic soils, ASTM STP 820, P. M. Jarrett, ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, W. Conshohocken, Pa., 37–51.
Lanzo, G., Vucetic, M., and Doroudian, M.(1997). “Reduction of shear modulus at small strains in simple shear.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 123(11), 1035–1042.
Leonards, G. A., and Altschaeffl, A. G.(1964). “Compressibility of clay.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 90(5), 133–156.
Mesri, G., and Castro, A.(1987). “ concept and during secondary compression.” J. Geotech. Eng., 113(3), 230–247.
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M.(1970). “Analyses of ground motions at Union Bay, Seattle, during earthquakes and distant nuclear blasts.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 60(1), 125–136.
Stokoe, K. H., II, Bay, J. A., Rosenbald, B. L., Hwang, S. K., and Twede, M. R. (1996). “In situ seismic and dynamic laboratory measurements of geotechnical materials at Queensboro Bridge and Roosevelt Island.” Geotechnical Engineering Rep. No. GR94-5, Civil Engineering Dept., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
Tan, K. Y., and Vucetic, M. (1989). “Behavior of medium and low plasticity clays under cyclic simple shear conditions.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, A. S. Cakmak, ed., Mexico City, October 23–26, Computational Mechanics Publications, Soil Dynamics and Liquefaction, 131–141.
Tatsuoka, F., Iwasaki, T., and Takagi, Y.(1978). “Hysteretic damping of sands under cyclic loading and its relation to shear modulus.” Soils Found., 18(2), 25–40.
Viggiani, G., and Atkinson, J. H.(1995). “Stiffness of fine-grained soil at very small strains.” Geotechnique, 45(2), 249–265.
Vucetic, M., and Dobry, R.(1988). “Degradation of marine clays under cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Eng., 114(2), 133–149.
Vucetic, M., and Dobry, R.(1991). “Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response.” J. Geotech. Eng., 117(1), 89–107.
Vucetic, M., Lanzo, G., and Doroudian, M.(1998). “Damping at small strains in cyclic simple shear test.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 124(7), 585–594.
Wehling, T. M., Boulanger, R. W., Harder, L. F., Jr., and Driller, M. W. (2001). “Dynamic properties of Sherman Island peat: Phase II study.” Rep. No. UCD/CGM-01/01, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Univ. of California, Davis, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 25, 2001
Accepted: Nov 7, 2002
Published online: Sep 15, 2003
Published in print: Oct 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.