Effects of Soil Heterogeneity on Airflow Patterns and Hydrocarbon Removal during In Situ Air Sparging
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a laboratory investigation performed to study the effect of soil heterogeneity on the removal of benzene from six different homogeneous and heterogeneous soil profiles using in situ air sparging. Air injected in homogeneous coarse sand profiles traveled in channels within a parabolic zone. Within fine gravel, injected air traveled in bubbles and was confined to a smaller zone of influence than within the sand profiles. Heterogeneous soil profiles were subjected to airflow patterns that were combinations of patterns observed in homogeneous soil profiles. When hydraulic conductivity differences between adjacent soil layers or inclusions were less than a factor of 10, air freely entered into the lower permeability soil regions. However, when differences were greater than a factor of 10, the injected air followed a path of least resistance and avoided regions of lower permeability. Regions that were subjected to high airflow were remediated rapidly as a result of efficient vapor-phase partitioning due to volatilization. Regions that were not subjected to high airflow, whether the result of locations outside of the zone of influence or airflow diversion due to permeability differences between adjacent soil layers/lenses, did not experience rapid contaminant removal and required rate-limiting diffusion for contaminant removal. Overall, the importance of determining the degree of soil heterogeneity at a given site with a detailed site investigation prior to implementing air sparging is demonstrated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. A., and Reddy, K. R. (2000). “Removal of dissolved- and free-phase benzene pools from ground water using in situ air sparging.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 126(8), 697–707.
2.
Ardito, C. P., and Billings, J. F. ( 1990). “Alternative remediation strategies: The subsurface volatilization and ventilation system.” Proc., Petr. Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection, and Restoration, National Ground Water Association, Westerville, Ohio, 281–296.
3.
Chen, M. R., Hinkley, R. E., and Killough, J. E. ( 1996). “Computerized tomography imaging of air sparging in porous media.” Water Resour. Res., 32(10), 3013–3024.
4.
Clayton, W. S. ( 1998). “A field and laboratory investigation of air fingering during air sparging.” Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 18(3), 134–145.
5.
Hayden, N. J., Voice, T. C., Annable, M. D., and Wallace, R. B. (1994). “Change in gasoline constituent mass transfer during soil venting.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 120(6), 1598–1614.
6.
Ji, W., Dahmani, A., Ahlfeld, D. P., Lin, J. D., and Hill, E., III ( 1993). “Laboratory study of air sparging: air flow visualization.” Ground Water Monitoring Rev., 13(4), 115–126.
7.
Johnson, P. C. ( 1998). “Assessment of the contributions of volatilization and biodegradation to in-situ air sparging performance.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 32(2), 276–281.
8.
Johnson, R. L., Johnson, P. C., McWhorter, D. B., Hinchee, R. E., and Goodman, I. ( 1993). “An overview of in situ air sparging.” Ground Water Monitoring Rev., 13(4), 127–135.
9.
Johnston, C. D., Rayner, J. L., Patterson, B. M., and Davis, G. B. ( 1998). “Volatilisation and biodegradation during air sparging of dissolved BTEX-contaminated groundwater.” J. Contaminant Hydro., 33(3–4), 377–404.
10.
Leonard, W. C., and Brown, R. A. ( 1994). “Air sparging: An optimal solution.” Proc., Petr. Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection, and Restoration, National Ground Water Association, Westerville, Ohio, 349–363.
11.
Lundegard, P. D., and Andersen, G. ( 1996). “Multiphase numerical simulation of air sparging performance.” Ground Water, 34(3), 451–460.
12.
McCray, J. E., and Falta, R. W. ( 1997). “Numerical simulation of air sparging for remediation of NAPL contamination.” Ground Water, 35(1), 99–110.
13.
Marley, M. C., Hazebrouck, D. J., and Walsh, M. T. ( 1992). “The application of in situ air sparging as an innovative soils and ground water remediation technology.” Ground Water Monitoring Rev., 12(2), 137–145.
14.
Reddy, K. R., and Adams, J. A. (1998). “System effects on benzene removal from saturated soils and ground water using air sparging.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 124(3), 288–299.
15.
Reddy, K. R., Kosgi, S., and Zhou, J. ( 1995). “A review of in-situ air sparging for the remediation of VOC-contaminated saturated soils and groundwater.” Haz. Waste and Haz. Mat., 12(2), 97–118.
16.
Semer, R., and Reddy, K. R. ( 1997). “Mechanisms controlling toluene removal from saturated soils during in situ air sparging.” J. Haz. Mat., 57(1–3), 209–230.
17.
van Dijke, M. I. J., and van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M. ( 1998). “Modeling of air sparging in a layered soil: Numerical and analytical approximations.” J. Geophys. Res., 34(3), 341–353.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 127 • Issue 3 • March 2001
Pages: 234 - 247
History
Received: Jul 6, 1999
Published online: Mar 1, 2001
Published in print: Mar 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.