TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 1, 2001

Seismic Performance of Hillside Fills

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 11

Abstract

Permanent ground deformations in unsaturated, compacted hillside fills under seismic loading conditions are discussed, with emphasis given to fill performance during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. These movements represent a significant yet often unrecognized hazard to developed hillside areas, as relatively modest deformations induced widespread damage totaling hundreds of millions of dollars during the Northridge event. The development of grading standards in the Los Angeles area is reviewed to place the seismic fill deformation problem in context with other issues that have shaped design and construction practices for hillside fills. Field observational data on fill performance during the Northridge earthquake is presented, and typical ground distress patterns are found to include cracking near cut/fill contacts, lateral extension and settlement of fill pads, and bulging of fill slope faces. For most sites, the prevalent mechanism of permanent ground deformation responsible for the fill movements is contractive volumetric strain accumulation within the unsaturated fill soils during strong earthquake shaking (that is, seismic compression).

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Bray, J. D., Rathje, E. M., Augello, A. J., and Merry, S. M. ( 1998). “Simplified seismic design procedure for geosynthetic-lined, solid-waste landfills.” Geosynthetics Int., 5(1–2), 203–225.
2.
Chang, S. W., Bray, J. D., and Seed, R. B. ( 1996). “Engineering implications of ground motions from the Northridge earthquake.” Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 86(1B), S270–S288.
3.
Chu, H.-H., and Vucetic, M. ( 1992). “Settlement of compacted clay in a cyclic direct sample shear device.” Geotech. Testing J., 15(4), 371–379.
4.
City of Los Angeles. ( 1995). City of Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety/SEAOSC Joint Task Force on Evaluating Damage Due to the Northridge Earthquake. “Subcommittee No. 12—Soils,” Final Rep., February.
5.
Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI). ( 1993). “Guidelines for determining design basis ground motions. 1: Method and guidelines for estimating earthquake ground motion in eastern North America.” Rep. No. EPRI TR-102293, Palo Alto, Calif.
6.
Franklin, A. G., and Chang, F. K. ( 1977). “Earthquake resistance of earth and rockfill dams.” Misc. Paper S-71-17, U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
7.
Hudson, M. B., and Idriss, I. M. ( 1996). “QUAD496: A computer program to evaluate the seismic response of soil structures using finite element procedures, incorporating a compliant base, and incorporating the segmented equivalent linear procedure.” Ctr. for Geotech. Modeling, University of California, Davis.
8.
Idriss, I. M., and Sun, J. I. ( 1991). “User's manual for SHAKE91: A computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analyses of horizontally layered soil deposits.” Ctr. for Geotech. Modeling, University of California, Davis.
9.
Lanzo, G., Vucetic, M., and Doroudian, M. (1997). “Reduction of shear modulus at small strains in simple shear.”J. of Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., ASCE, 123(11), 1035–1042.
10.
Lawson, A. C., ed. ( 1908). “Minor geologic effects of the earthquake.” California earthquake of April 18, 1906, Publ. 87, Vol. 1, Part 2, Carnegie Institution of Washington, D.C., 384–409.
11.
Lee, K. L., and Singh, A. ( 1971). “Compaction of granular soils.” Proc., 9th Annu. Symp. on Engrg. Geol. and Soils Engrg., Boise, Idaho, 161–174.
12.
Liu, A. H., Stewart, J. P., Abrahamson, N. A., and Moriwaki, Y. (2001). “Equivalent number of uniform stress cycles for soil liquefaction analysis.”J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., ASCE, 127(12).
13.
Makdisi, F. I., and Seed, H. B. (1978). “Simplified procedure for estimating dam and embankment earthquake-induced deformations.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 104(7), 849–867.
14.
McClure, F. E. ( 1973). Performance of single family dwellings in the San Fernando earthquake of February 9, 1971. NOAA, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, May.
15.
Newmark, N. M. ( 1965). “Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments.” Géotechnique, London, 15(2), 139–160.
16.
Pearson, D. ( 1995). “L.A. County `Section 309' Statement.” Geogram, California Geotechnical Engineers Association, Placerville, Calif.
17.
Pyke, R., Chan, C. K., and Seed, H. B. (1975). “Settlement of sands under multidirectional shaking.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 101(4), 379–398.
18.
Rathje, E. M., Abrahamson, N. A., and Bray, J. D. (1998). “Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions.”J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., ASCE, 124(2), 150–159.
19.
Rogers, J. D. ( 1992). “Seismic response of highway embankments.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1343, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 52–62.
20.
Scullin, C. M. ( 1983). Excavation and grading code administration, inspection, and enforcement. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
21.
Seed, H. B. ( 1967). Soil stability problems caused by earthquakes. Soil Mech. and Bituminous Mat. Res. Lab., University of California, Berkeley, January.
22.
Seed, H. B., Wong, R. T., Idriss, I. M., and Tokimatsu, K. ( 1984). “Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils.” Rep. No. UCB/EERC-84/14, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., University of California, Berkeley.
23.
Silver, M. L., and Seed, H. B. (1971). “Volume changes in sands during cyclic loading.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 97(9), 1171–1182.
24.
Slosson, J. E. ( 1975). “Chapter 19: Effects of the earthquake on residential areas.” San Fernando, California, Earthquake of 9 February 1971, Bulletin 196, California Division of Mines and Geology, Sacramento Calif.
25.
Somerville, P. G., Smith, N. F., Graves, R. W., and Abrahamson, N. A. ( 1997). “Modification of empirical strong motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity.” Seismological Res. Letters, 68(1), 94–127.
26.
Stewart, J. P., Bray, J. D., McMahon, D. J., and Kropp, A. L. ( 1995). “Seismic performance of hillside fills.” Landslides under static and dynamic conditions—Analysis, monitoring, and mitigation, D. K. Keefer and C. L. Ho, eds., ASCE, New York, 76–95.
27.
Stewart, J. P., Seed, R. B., and Bray, J. D. ( 1996). “Incidents of ground failure from the Northridge earthquake.” Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 86(1B), S300–S318.
28.
Stewart, J. P., and Smith, P. M. ( 1998). Ground deformations in constructed ground. Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of California, Los Angeles.
29.
Stokoe, K. H., Darendeli, M. B., Andrus, R. D., and Brown, L. T. ( 1999). “Dynamic soil properties: Laboratory, field and correlation studies.” Earthquake geotechnical engineering, S. Pinto, ed., Vol. 3, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 811–845.
30.
Tan, S. ( 1994). “Landslide hazards and effects of the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994, in southern part of the Van Nuys Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California.” Open File Rep. 95-02, California Division of Mines Geology, January.
31.
Tokimatsu, K., and Seed, H. B. (1987). “Evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 113(8), 861–878.
32.
Vucetic, M. (1994). “Cyclic threshold shear strains in soils.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 120(12), 2208–2228.
33.
Wald, D. J., and Heaton, T. H. ( 1994). “A dislocation model of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake determined from strong ground motions.” Open-File Rep. 94-278, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
34.
Whang, D. ( 2001). “Seismic compression of compacted soil.” PhD dissertation, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
35.
Youd, T. L. (1972). “Compaction of sands by repeated shear straining.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 98(7), 709–725.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 127Issue 11November 2001
Pages: 905 - 919

History

Received: Oct 24, 2000
Published online: Nov 1, 2001
Published in print: Nov 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Members, ASCE
Student Member, ASCE
Member, ASCE
Asst. Prof., Civ. and Envir. Engrg. Dept., Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Prof., Civ. and Envir. Engrg. Dept., Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Consultant, Berkeley, CA 94706.
Grad. Student, Civ. and Envir. Engrg. Dept., Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Prin. Engr., Alan Kropp & Associates, Berkeley, CA 94704.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share