Capillary Barrier Effect from Underlying Coarser Soil Layer
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 8
Abstract
Infiltration tests were conducted on soil columns of silty sand over pea gravel, concrete sand over pea gravel, and silty sand over concrete sand to investigate the capillary barrier effect of an underlying coarser soil layer. Water movement across the interface occurred when the suction head at the interface reached the breakthrough head of the coarser lower soil layer, defined as the suction head at which the coarser layer first became conductive, regardless of infiltration rate or the properties of the overlying finer soil layer. Thus, the coarser lower soil layer controlled breakthrough in this study. After infiltration was terminated, the suction head near the interface increased above the breakthrough head and the barrier was restored. The breakthrough head did not change substantially after eight test cycles of breakthrough and restoration for a capillary barrier with a pea gravel as the coarser lower soil layer. The barrier formed with the concrete sand as the coarser layer permitted breakthrough at a greater suction head than did the barrier with the pea gravel, indicating that the more uniform and coarse the lower soil layer is, the more effective the capillary barrier.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baker, R. S., and Hillel, D. (1990). “Laboratory tests of a theory of fingering during infiltration into layered soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J., 54, 20–30.
2.
Benson, C. H., and Khire, M. V. ( 1995). “Earthen covers for semi-arid and arid climates.” Landfill closures—Environmental protection and land recovery. Geotech. Spec. Publ. No. 53, R. J. Dunn and U. P. Singh, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., 201–217.
3.
Bouwer, H. (1966). “Rapid field measurement of air entry value and hydraulic conductivity of soil as significant parameters in system analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 2(4), 729–738.
4.
Campbell, G. S., and Anderson, R. Y. (1998). “Evaluation of simple transmission line oscillators for soil moisture measurement.” Comp. and Electronics in Agr., 20, 31–44.
5.
Conca, J. L., Apted, M. J., Zhou, W., Arthur, R. C., and Kessler, J. H. (1998). “Flow barrier system for long-term high-level-waste isolation: Experimental results.” Nuclear Technol., 124, 88–100.
6.
Conca, J. L., Robinson, B. A., Triay, I. R., and Bussod, G. Y. (1997). “Direct characterization of transport parameters in near-field and engineered backfill/invert materials.” Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, Mat. Res. Symp., Proc., Materials Research Society, Boston, Mass., 465, 951–962.
7.
Dwyer, S. F. ( 1995). “Alternative landfill cover demonstration.” Landfill closures—Environmental protection and land recovery. Geotech. Spec. Publ. No. 53, R. J. Dunn and U. P. Singh, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., 19–34.
8.
Haines, W. B. (1930). “Studies in the physical properties of soil. V. The hysteresis effect in capillary properties, and the modes of moisture distribution associated therewith.” J. Agric. Sci., 20, 97–116.
9.
Hillel, D. (1980). Introduction to soil physics. Academic, San Diego.
10.
Hillel, D., and Baker, R. S. (1988). “A descriptive theory of fingering during infiltration into layered soils.” Soil Sci., 146(1), 51–56.
11.
Morris, C. E., and Stormont, J. C. (1997). “Capillary barriers and subtitle D covers: Estimating equivalency.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 123(1), 3(1), 3–10.
12.
Mualem, Y. (1976). “A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media.” Water Resour Res., 12, 513–522.
13.
Nicholson, R. V., Gillham, R. W., Cherry, J. A., and Reardon, E. J. (1989). “Reduction of acid generation in mine tailings through the use of moisture-retaining cover layers as oxygen barriers.” Can. Geotech. J., Ottawa, 26, 1–8.
14.
Standard test method for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of porous material using a rigid-wall compaction-mold permeameter; D 5856-95. (1995). ASTM, West Conshohoken, Pa.
15.
Stormont, J. C. ( 1995). “The performance of two capillary barriers during constant infiltration.” Landfill closures—Environmental protection and land recovery. Geotech Spec. Publ. No. 53, R. J. Dunn and U. P. Singh, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., 77–92.
16.
Stormont, J. C., and Morris, C. E. (1998). “Method to estimate water storage capacity of capillary barriers.”J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., ASCE, 124(4), 297–302.
17.
Test method for classification of soils for engineering purposes; D 2487-93. (1993). ASTM, West Conshohoken, Pa.
18.
Test method for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort [12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN m/m3)]; D 698-91. (1991). ASTM, West Conshohoken, Pa.
19.
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980). “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils.” Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J., 44, 892–898.
20.
van Genuchten, M. T., Leij, F. J., and Yates, S. R. (1991). “The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils.” U.S. Envir. Protection Agency Rep. EPA/600/2-91/065, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
21.
Waugh, W. J., Petersen, K. L., Link, S. O., Bjornstad, B. N., and Gee, G. W. (1994). “Natural analogs of the long-term performance of engineered covers.” 33rd Hanford Symp. on Health and Envir. In-Situ Remediation: Sci. Basis for Current and Future Technol., Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, 379–409.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 125 • Issue 8 • August 1999
Pages: 641 - 648
History
Received: Aug 4, 1997
Published online: Aug 1, 1999
Published in print: Aug 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.