Influence of In Situ Factors on Dynamic Response of Piedmont Residual Soils
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 4
Abstract
The in situ chemical and physical weathering of igneous and metamorphic rocks, indentified as the process of formation of Piedmont residual soils, is a fairly well understood phenomenon. However, the effect this weathering has on the physical, mechanical, and dynamic properties of the rock/soil is not understood fully. This study focuses on the dynamic shear modulus, G, and material damping ratio, D, of this soil formation for low- to mid-level amplitudes of vibration. The paper presents laboratory test results and correlations that demonstrate the effects that the degree of weathering has on these properties for various levels of confining pressure and shear strain amplitude. A total of 12 specimens of Piedmont residual soils from different depths were tested in a Resonant Column (RC) device. The specimens tested were SM and ML soils according to the USCS classification. The low-amplitude shear modulus and damping values were found to be similar to those reported in the literature from laboratory and in situ tests on the same type of soils. It was found that weathering, void ratio, and apparent overconsolidation ratio exert a noticeable influence on the dynamic response as a result of variations in confining pressure. The understanding of these effects will allow for a better prediction of phenomena such as soil amplification, which may result in damage to existing civil infrastructure founded on these soil deposits. The response in free field soil deposits compared with that of soils experiencing added confining stresses due to foundation loading appears to vary significantly in these geologic formations. Threshold strain and the variation of damping, D, with the normalized shear moduli, G/Gmax, fall within the same range as those recently reported by other authors in similar soils.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Borden, R. H., Shao, L., and Gupta, A. (1996). “Dynamic properties of Piedmont residual soils.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 122(10), 813–821.
2.
Davis, R. ( 1995). “Effects of weathering on site response.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., 24, 301–309.
3.
Dobry, R., Yokel, F. Y., and Ladd, R. S. ( 1981). “Liquefaction potential of over-consolidated sands in moderately seismic areas.” Proc., Conf. on Earthquake and Earthquake Engrg. in the Eastern U.S., Knoxville, Tenn., Vol. 2, 643–664.
4.
Dobry, R., Ladd, R. S., Yokel, F. Y., Chung, R. M., and Powell, D. J. ( 1982). “Prediction of pore pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method.” Nat. Bureau of Standards Build. Sci. Series, 138.
5.
Ferreira, N. ( 1985). “Characterization, identification and classification of tropical lateritic and saprolitic soils for geotechnical purposes.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Geomech. in Tropical Lateritic and Saprolitic Soils, Brazilian Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundations, Brasilia, Brazil, 139–170.
6.
Hardin, B. O., and Black, W. L. (1968). “Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 94(2), 353–368.
7.
Hardin, B. O., and Drnevich, V. P. (1972). “Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 98(7), 667–692.
8.
Huoo-Ni, S. ( 1987). “Dynamic properties of sand under true triaxial stress states from resonant-column/torsional-shear tests,” PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Tex.
9.
Isenhower, W. M. ( 1979). “Torsional simple shear/resonant column properties of San Francisco Bay mud,” Thesis GT80-1, Geotech. Engrg. Ctr., University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
10.
Kates, G. L. ( 1996). “Development and implementation of a seismic flat dilatometer test for small- and high-strain soil properties,” MS thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.
11.
Macari, E. J., and Hoyos, L. Jr. (1996). “Effect of degree of weathering on dynamic properties of residual soils.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 122(12), 988–997.
12.
Marchetti, S., and Crapps, D. K. ( 1981). Flat dilatometer manual . GPE Inc., Gainesville, Fla.
13.
Martin, R. E. (1977). “Estimating foundation settlement in residual soils.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 103(3), 197–212.
14.
Mitchell, J. K., and Sitar, N. ( 1982). “Engineering properties of tropical residual soils.” Proc., Conf. on Engrg. and Constr. in Tropical and Residual Soils, ASCE, Reston, Va.
15.
Richart, F. E., Hall, J. R. Jr., and Woods, R. D. ( 1970). Vibrations of soils and foundations . Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
16.
Richart, F. E. (1975). “Some effects of dynamic soil properties on soil-structure interaction.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 101(1), 21–24.
17.
Sowers, G. F. ( 1954). “Soil problems in the Southern Piedmont Region.” Proc., Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, Reston, Va., 80(416).
18.
Sowers, G. F., and Richardson, T. L. ( 1983). “Residual soils of Piedmont and Blue Ridge.” Transp. Res. Rec. 919, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
19.
Stokoe, K. H., Anderson, A. M., Hoar, R. J., and Isenhower, W. M. ( 1978). “In-situ and laboratory shear velocity and modulus.” Proc., Earthquake Engrg. and Soil Dyn. Conf., ASCE, Reston, Va.
20.
Stokoe, K. H., Isenhower, W. M., and Hsu, J. R. ( 1980). “Dynamic properties of offshore silty samples.” OTC 3771, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Tex.
21.
Stokoe, K. H., Nasir, S. H., and Andrus, R. D. ( 1991). “In-situ and laboratory measurements of the dynamic properties of cemented granular soils: A case history.” U.S./Brazil Geotech. Engrg. Workshop, A. S. Nieto, ed., University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill, 1–39.
22.
“Test methods for modulus and damping of soils by the resonant column method.” (1993). Standard D 4015-92, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 581–593.
23.
Vaughan, P. R., and Kwan, C. W. ( 1984). “Weathering, structure and in-situ stress in residual soils.” Geotechnique, 34(1), 43–59.
24.
Wang, C. E., and Borden, R. H. (1996). “Deformation characteristics of Piedmont Residual Soils.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 122(10), 822–830.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 125 • Issue 4 • April 1999
Pages: 271 - 279
History
Received: Jan 26, 1998
Published online: Apr 1, 1999
Published in print: Apr 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.