Effects of Electroosmosis on Natural Soil: Field Test
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 12
Abstract
A unique configuration of horizontal sheet-like electrodes was used in the field at a site in Ohio that was underlain by silty clay glacial drift to induce electroosmotic flow and to characterize the effects of electroosmosis on soil properties (e.g., electrical conductivity and pH). The lower electrode was created at a depth of 2.2 m by filling a flat-lying hydraulic fracture with granular graphite, and the upper one was a metallic mesh placed at a depth of 0.4 m and covered with sand. The electrodes were attached to a DC power supply, creating an electrical gradient of 20–31 V/m and a current of 42–57 A within approximately 20 m3 of soil. Total energy applied was 5,500 kW⋅h during approximate 4 months of operation. Electroosmotic flow rates of 0.6–0.8 L/h were observed during tests lasting several weeks, although total flow rate (electroosmotic plus hydraulic) was strongly influenced by fluctuations of the ground-water table. The ratio of applied current to voltage decreased from 0.9 to 0.6 A/V and was mainly due to a decrease in electrical conductivity of the soil. A low pH front developed at the anode and migrated toward the cathode. The velocity of the pH front per unit voltage gradient was 0.014 (cm/day)/(V/m). This was 40 times slower than what has been reported from laboratory experiments using kaolinite as a medium. These results confirm the feasibility of using horizontal electrodes at shallow depths, but they also underscore some important differences between the geochemical effects observed during field tests in natural soils and those seen in laboratory tests using ideal materials.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Acar, Y. B., Alshawabkeh, A. N., and Gale, R. J. (1993). “Fundamentals of extracting species from soils by electrokinetics.” Waste Mgmt., 13, 141–151.
2.
Acar, Y. B., Hamed, J. T., Alshawabkeh, A. N., and Gale, R. J. (1994). “Removal of cadmium (II) from saturated kaolinite by the application of electrical current.” Géotechnique, London, 44(2), 239–254.
3.
Bruell, C. J., Segall, B. A., and Walsh, M. T. (1992). “Electroosmotic removal of gasoline hydrocarbons and TCE from clay.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 118(1), 68–83.
4.
Chen, J.-L. ( 1997). “Characterization of in situ electroosmosis using conductive fractures,” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.
5.
Chen, J.-L., Al-Abed S., Bryndzia, L. T., and Murdoch, L. (1999). “Cation transport and partitioning during a field test of electroosmosis.” Water Resour. Res., accepted for publication.
6.
Eykholt, G. R., and Daniel, D. E. (1994). “Impact of system chemistry on electroosmosis in contaminated soil.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 120(5), 797–815.
7.
Fetter, C. W. (1993). Contaminant hydrogeology. Macmillan, New York.
8.
Hamed, J., Acar, Y. B., and Gale, R. J. (1991). “Pb(II) removal from kaolinite by electro-kinetics.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 117(2), 241–271.
9.
Hicks, R. E., and Tondorf, S. (1994). “Electrorestoration of metal contaminated soils.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 28(12), 2203–2210.
10.
Hvorslev, M. J. ( 1951). “Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observation.” Bull. 36, U.S. Army of Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
11.
Jacobs, R. A., Sengun, M. Z., Hicks, R. E., and Probstein, R. F. (1994). “Model and experiments on soil remediation by electric fields.” J. Envir. Sci. Health, A29(9), 1933–1955.
12.
Keely, J. F. ( 1989). “Performance evaluation of pump- and treat remediations.” EPA Ground Water Issue, EPA/540/4-89/005, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.
13.
Lerch, N. K., Hale, W. F., and Lemaster, D. D. ( 1982). Soil Survey of Hamilton County, Ohio. U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
14.
Murdoch, L. C. (1990). “A field test of hydraulic fracturing in glacial till.” Proc., 15th Annu. USEPA Res. Symp.
15.
Murdoch, L. C., and Chen, J.-L. (1997). “Effects of conductive fractures during in situ electroosmosis.” J. Haz. Mat., 55, 239–262.
16.
Murdoch, L. C., Losonsky, G., Cluxton, P., Patterson, B., Klich, I., and Braswell, B. (1991). “The feasibility of hydraulic fracturing of soil to improve remedial actions.” Final Rep. USEPA 600/2-91-012; NTIS Rep. PB91-181818, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va.
17.
Murdoch, L. C., Wilson, D., Savage, K., Slack, W., and Uber, J. ( 1995). “Alternative methods for fluid delivery and recovery.” USEPA/625/R-94/003, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C.
18.
Pankow, J. F., and Cherry, J. A. (1996). Dense chlorinated solvents and other DNAPLs in groundwater. Waterloo Press. Portland, Oreg.
19.
Probstein, R. F., and Hicks, R. E. (1993). “Removal of contaminants from soils by electric fields.” Sci., 260, 498–503.
20.
Rhoades, J. D., Manteghi, N. A., Shouse, P. J., and Alves, W. J. (1989). “Soil electrical conductivity and soil salinity: New formulations and calibrations.” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 53, 433–439.
21.
Thomas, G. W. ( 1996). “Soil pH and soil acidity.” Methods of soil analysis, Part 3, SSSA book series 5, D. L. Sparks, ed., Soil Science Society of American and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis., 475–490.
22.
White, J. L., and Roth, C. B. ( 1996). “Infrared spectrometry.” Methods of soil analysis, Part 1, 2nd Ed, SSSA book series 5, A. Klute, ed., Soil Science Society of American and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wis., 291–330.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Aug 17, 1998
Published online: Dec 1, 1999
Published in print: Dec 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.