TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 1, 1999

Liquefaction Opportunity Mapping via Seismic Wave Energy

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 12

Abstract

An empirical, energy-based methodology for liquefaction hazard assessment and microzonation mapping is presented. The approach is probabilistic, considers the uncertainty in the liquefaction criterion, and is applicable to most earthquake-induced liquefaction analyses. The examples illustrated are for water-saturated sands at level ground. The energy of ground shaking is estimated from the Fourier amplitude spectra of the incident waves. The susceptible materials are characterized only by their corrected standard penetration test value N¯ and overburden pressure σ0. Illustrative microzonation maps of liquefaction opportunity are shown for the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Two types of maps are presented, one showing the average return period of liquefaction occurrence (for given N¯ and σ0), and another one showing distribution of N¯ with equal probability to liquefy during 50 years exposure (for given σ0). An advantage of the method is that the result is given directly in terms of in situ albeit simple soil characteristics rather than in terms of laboratory tests and peak acceleration. Possible applications of the computed opportunity maps are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Algermissen, S. T., and Perkins, D. M. (1976). “A probabilistic estimate of maximum acceleration in rock in the contiguous United States.” Open File Rep. 76-416, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Geological Survey.
2.
Ambraseys, N. N. (1988). “Engineering seismology.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 7, 70–105.
3.
Atkinson, G. M., Finn, W. D. L., and Charlwood, R. G. (1984). “Simple computation of liquefaction probability for seismic hazard applications.” Earthquake Spectra, 1(1), 107–123.
4.
Benioff, H. (1934). “A physical evaluation of seismic destructiveness.” Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 24, 389–403.
5.
Berrill, J. B., and Davis, R. O. (1985). “Energy dissipation and seismic liquefaction of sands: Revised model.” Soils and Found., Tokyo, 25(2), 106–118.
6.
Blazquez, R. M., Krizek, R. J., and Bažant, Z. P. (1980). “Site factors controlling liquefaction.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 106(7), 785–801.
7.
Davis, R. O., and Berrill, J. B. (1982). “Energy dissipation and seismic liquefaction in sands.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 10, 51–68.
8.
Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S. L., and Keeney, R. (1981). Acceptable risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
9.
Holzer, T. L., Youd, T. L., and Hanks, T. C. (1989). “Dynamics of liquefaction during the 1987 Superstition Hills, California, Earthquake.” Sci., 244, 56–59.
10.
Kavazanjian, E., Jr. Roth, R. A., and Echezuria, H. (1985). “Liquefaction potential mapping for San Francisco.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 111(1), 54–76.
11.
Kayen, R. E., and Mitchell, J. K. (1997). “Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes, by Arias intensity.”J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., ASCE, 123(12), 1162–1174.
12.
Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
13.
Kuribayashi, E., and Tatsuoka, F. (1975). “Brief review of liquefaction during earthquakes in Japan.” Soils and Found., 15, 81–92.
14.
Lee, V. W. (1993). “Scaling PSV from earthquake magnitude, local soil and geological depth of sediments.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 119(1), 108–126.
15.
Lee, V. W., Amini, A., and Trifunac, M. D. (1982). “Noise in earthquake accelerograms.”J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 108(6), 1121–1129.
16.
Lee, V. W., and Trifunac, M. D. (1985). “Uniform risk spectra of strong earthquake ground motion: NEQRISK.” Rep. CE 85-05, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
17.
Lee, V. W., and Trifunac, M. D. (1987). “Microzonation of a metropolitan area.” Rep. CE 87-02, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
18.
Lee, V, W., and Trifunac, M. D. (1995a). “Frequency dependent attenuation function and Fourier amplitude spectra of strong earthquake ground motion in California.” Rep. CE 95-03, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
19.
Lee, V. W., and Trifunac, M. D. (1995b). “Pseudo relative velocity spectra of strong earthquake ground motion in California.” Rep. CE 95-04, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
20.
Lee, V. W., Trifunac, M. D., Todorovska, M. I., and Novikova, E. I. (1995). “Empirical equations describing attenuation of the peaks of strong ground motion, in terms of magnitude, distance, path effects and site conditions.” Rep. CE 95-02, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
21.
Novikova, E. I., and Trifunac, M. D. (1993). “Duration of strong earthquake ground motion: Physical basis and empirical equations.” Rep. CE 93-02, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
22.
Novikova, E. I., and Trifunac, M. D. (1995). “Frequency dependent duration of strong earthquake ground motion: Updated empirical equations.” Rep. CE 95-01, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
23.
Papaulis, A. (1962). The Fourier integral and its applications. McGraw-Hill, New York.
24.
Richter, C. F. (1958). Elementary seismology. Freeman, San Francisco.
25.
Robertson, P. K., and Capanella, R. G. (1985). “Liquefaction potential of sands using CPT.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 111(3), 384–403.
26.
Robertson, P. K., Woeller, D. J., and Finn, W. D. L. (1992). “Seismic cone penetration tests for evaluating liquefaction potential under cycling loading.” Can. Geotech. J., Ottawa, 29(4), 686–695.
27.
Seed, H. B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L., and Chung, R. (1984). “The influence of SPT procedures on soil liquefaction resistance evaluations.” Rep. No. 84-15, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
28.
Shibata, S., and Teparaksa, W. (1988). “Evaluation of liquefaction potentials of soils using cone penetration tests.” Soils and Found., 28(2), 49–60.
29.
Tinsley, J. C., Youd, T. L., Perkins, D. M., and Chen, A. T. F. ( 1985). “Evaluating liquefaction potential.” U.S. Geological Survey Profl. Paper 1360, 263–315.
30.
Todorovska, M. I. (1994a). “Comparison of response spectrum amplitudes from earthquakes with lognormally and exponentially distributed return period.” Soil. Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 13(2), 97–116.
31.
Todorovska, M. I. (1994b). “Order statistics of functionals of strong ground motion for a class of renewal processes.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 13(6), 399–405.
32.
Todorovska, M. I. (1995a). “Effects of earthquake source parameters on uniform probability response spectra.” Proc., 10th Eur. Conf. Earthquake Engrg., Vol. 4, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2579–2584.
33.
Todorovska, M. I. (1995b). “Uniform probability response spectra for selecting site specific design motions.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Recent Adv. in Geotech. Earthquake Engrg. and Soil Dyn., Vol. II, 613–618.
34.
Todorovska, M. I. (1996). “Liquefaction hazard assessment via seismic wave energy and SPT values.” Eur. Earthquake Engrg., 10(2), 24–37.
35.
Todorovska, M. I. ( 1998). “Quick reference liquefaction opportunity maps for a metropolitan area.” Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics III, Geotech. Spec. Publ. No. 75, Vol. 1, ASCE, Reston, Va., 116–127.
36.
Todorovska, M. I., Gupta, I. D., Gupta, V. K., Lee, V. W., and Trifunac, M. D. (1995). “Selected topics in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment.” Rep. CE 95-08, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
37.
Todorovska, M. I., and Lee, V. W. (1995). “A note on sensitivity of uniform probability spectra on modeling the fault geometry in areas with a shallow seismogenic zone.” Eur. Earthquake Engrg., 9(2), 14–22.
38.
Todorovska, M. I., and Trifunac, M. D. (1996). “Hazard mapping of normalized peak strain in soil during earthquakes: Microzonation of a metropolitan area.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 15(5), 321–329.
39.
Todorovska, M. I., and Trifunac, M. D. (1997a). “Distribution of pseudo spectral velocity during the Northridge, California, earthquake of 17 January, 1994.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 16(3), 173–192.
40.
Todorovska, M. I., and Trifunac, M. D. (1997b). “Amplitudes, polarity and time of peaks of strong ground motion during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 16(4), 235–258.
41.
Trifunac, M. D. (1972). “Tectonic stress and the source mechanism of the Imperial Valley, California, Earthquake of 1940.” Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 62(5), 1283–1302.
42.
Trifunac, M. D. (1976a). “Preliminary empirical model for scaling Fourier amplitude spectra of strong ground acceleration in terms of earthquake magnitude, source to station distance, and recording site conditions.” Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 66(9), 1343–1373.
43.
Trifunac, M. D. (1976b). “Preliminary analysis of the peaks of strong earthquake ground motion—Dependence of peaks on earthquake magnitude, epicentral distance and the recording site conditions.” Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 66, 187–219.
44.
Trifunac, M. D. (1988). “Seismic microzonation mapping via uniform risk spectra.” Proc., 9th World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Vol. VIII, 75–80, Tokyo-Kyoto, Maruzen Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
45.
Trifunac, M. D. (1990a). “How to model amplification of strong earthquake motion by local geologic and soil site conditions.” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 19(6), 833–846.
46.
Trifunac, M. D. (1990b). “A microzonation method based on uniform risk spectra.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 9(1), 34–43.
47.
Trifunac, M. D. (1993). “Long period Fourier amplitude spectra of strong motion acceleration.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 12(6), 363–382.
48.
Trifunac, M. D. (1994). “Q and high frequency strong motion spectra.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 13(3), 149–161.
49.
Trifunac, M. D. (1995). “Empirical criteria for liquefaction in sands via standard penetration tests and seismic wave energy.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 14(6), 419–426.
50.
Trifunac, M. D. (1999). “Discussion of `Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes,' by R. E. Kayen and J. K. Mitchell.”J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., ASCE, 125(7), 627.
51.
Trifunac, M. D., and Brady, A. G. (1975). “A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion.” Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 65(3), 581–626.
52.
Trifunac, M. D., and Lee, V. W. (1966). “Peak surface strains during strong earthquake motion.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 15(5), 311–319.
53.
Trifunac, M. D., and Lee, V. W. (1990). “Frequency dependent attenuation of strong earthquake ground motion.” Soil. Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 9(1), 3–15.
54.
Trifunac, M. D., and Novikova, E. I. (1995). “State of the art review of strong motion duration.” Proc., 10th Eur. Conf. Earthquake Engrg., Vol. 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 131–140.
55.
Trifunac, M. D., and Todorovska, M. I. (1996). “Nonlinear soil response—1994 Northridge, California, earthquake.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 122(9), 725–735.
56.
Trifunac, M. D., and Todorovska, M. I. (1998a). “Nonlinear soil response as a natural passive isolation mechanism—1994 Northridge, California, earthquake.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 17(1), 41–51.
57.
Trifunac, M. D., and Todorovska, M. I. (1998b). “Amplification of strong ground motion and damage patterns during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake.” Proc., Spec. Conf. on Geotech. Engrg. and Soil Dyn., Geotech. Spec. Publ. No. 75, Vol. I, ASCE, Reston, Va., 714–725.
58.
Trifunac, M. D., and Todorovska, M. I. (1998c). “Damage distribution during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquakes relative to generalized categories of surficial geology.” Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 17(4), 239–253.
59.
Working group on California earthquake probabilities. (1995). “Seismic hazards in southern California: Probable earthquakes, 1994 to 2024.” Bull. Seismological Soc. of Am., 85(2), 379–439.
60.
Yegian, M. K., and Whitman, R. V. (1978). “Risk analysis for ground failure by liquefaction.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 104(7), 921–938.
61.
Yerkes, R. F., McCulloh, T. H., Schoellhamer, J. E., and Vedder, J. G. ( 1965). “Geology of the Los Angeles Basin, California—An introduction.” U.S. Geological Survey Profl. Paper 420-A.
62.
Youd, L. T. (1991). “Mapping of earthquake induced liquefaction for seismic zonation.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Seismic Zonation, Vol. I, 111–146.
63.
Youd, L. T., and Holzer, T. L. (1994). “Piezometer performance at wildlife liquefaction site, California.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 120(6), 975–995.
64.
Youd, L. T., and Perkins, D. M. (1978). “Mapping liquefaction induced ground failure potential.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 104(4), 433–446.
65.
Youd, L. T., and Perkins, D. M. (1987). “Mapping of liquefaction severity index.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 113(11), 1374–1392.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 125Issue 12December 1999
Pages: 1032 - 1042

History

Received: May 2, 1996
Published online: Dec 1, 1999
Published in print: Dec 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Res. Assoc. Prof., Civ. Engrg. Dept., Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2531.
Prof., Civ. Engrg. Dept., Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share