TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 1, 1999

Directing Exploration with 3D FEM Sensitivity and Data Uncertainty

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 11

Abstract

Quantitatively directed exploration (QDE) employs a first-order Taylor series expansion to combine sensitivity of a 3D finite-element model (FEM) and uncertainty in geologic data to calculate the variance in project performance, which is employed to direct exploration. This approach is made practical by calculating model sensitivity with direct differentiation of the engineering analysis code, thus producing sensitivity with a single model run rather than multiple runs required by parameter perturbation. Uncertainty in subsurface data is computed through two different extrapolation methods for comparison: kriging and conditional probability (Bayesian updating). Although either of these methods can be employed in QDE, conditional probability is required to quantifiably terminate exploration. The QDE framework is applicable to any subsurface analysis that employs a 3D FEM. A case study illustrates the QDE approach, where settlement is the performance criterion, and layer interface elevations are the uncertain geologic data. Additional boring locations identified by QDE were placed where a combination of model sensitivity and subsurface uncertainty was the greatest, thus directing exploration toward the building footprint and away from existing sampled points.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Baecher, G. B., and Ingra, T. S. (1981). “Stochastic FEM in settlement predictions.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 107(4), 449–463.
2.
Bischof, C., Carle, A., Khademi, P., Maure, A., and Hovland, P. (1995). “ADIFOR 2.0 user's guide (revision C).” Tech. Memo. No. 192 and Ctr. for Res. on Parallel Computation Tech. Rep. CRPC-95516-S, Mathematics and Comp. Sci. Div., Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill.
3.
Casagrande, A. (1965). “Role of the `calculated risk' in earthwork and foundation engineering.” J. Soil Mechanics and Foundations Div., ASCE, 91(SM4), 1–40.
4.
Davis, C. D. (1986). Statistics and data analysis in geology. Wiley, New York.
5.
Ditmars, J. D., Baecher, G. B., Edgar, D. E., and Dowding, C. H. ( 1988). “Radioactive waste isolation in salt: A method for evaluating the effectiveness of site characterization measurements.” U.S. Department of Energy, Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Salt Repository Project Office, available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, Va.
6.
Dowding, C. H., ed. (1978). Site characterization and exploration. Proc., Geotech. Div., ASCE, New York.
7.
Finno, R. J. ( 1983). “Response of cohesive soil to advanced shield tunneling,” PhD thesis, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
8.
Finno, R. J. ( 1996). “LIGO report.” Internal Northwestern University document. Civ. Engrg. Dept., Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
9.
Freeze, R. A., Massmann, J., Smith, L., Sperling, T., and James, B. (1990). “Hydrogeological decision analysis: 1. A framework.” Ground Water, 28(5), 738–766.
10.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., and Rubin, D. B. ( 1995). Bayesian data analysis. Chapman & Hall, London, 478–479.
11.
Graettinger, A. J. ( 1998). “Reliability-based exploration: A quantitative method for evaluating and directing subsurface characterization,” PhD thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
12.
Graettinger, A. J., and Dowding, C. H. (1997). “Quantitative site exploration directed by interface location uncertainty.” Proc., 5th Great Lakes Geotech./Geoenvir. Conf., Site Characterization for Geotech. and Geoenvir. Problems, University of Michigan, College of Engrg., Ann Arbor, Mich., 117–131.
13.
Grivas, D. A. (1977). “Probability theory and reliability analysis in geotechnical engineering.” Rep. of an NSF-Sponsored Workshop at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., New York.
14.
Harr, M. E. (1996). Reliability-based design in civil engineering. Dover, New York.
15.
Horwedel, J. E., Raridon, R. J., and Wright, R. Q. (1992). “Automated sensitivity analysis of an atmospheric dispersion model.” Atmospheric Envir., 26A(9), 1643-1649.
16.
Isaaks, E. H., and Srivastava, R. M. ( 1989). An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, 278–322.
17.
Johnson, R. L. (1996). “A Bayesian geostatistical approach to the design of adaptive sampling programs.” Geostatistics for environmental and geotechnical applications, ASTM STP 1283, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
18.
Johnston, P. R. ( 1981). “Finite element consolidation analysis of tunnel behavior in clay,” PhD thesis, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
19.
Kulhawy, F. H., and Trautmann, C. H. ( 1996). “Estimation of in-situ uncertainty.” Uncertainty in the geologic environment: From theory to practice, Geotech. Spec. Publ. No. 58, ASCE, New York, 269–286.
20.
Lacasse, S., and Nadim, F. ( 1996). “Uncertainties in characterizing soil properties.” Uncertainty in the geologic environment: From theory to practice, Geotech. Spec. Publ. No. 58, ASCE, New York, 49–75.
21.
National Research Council. (1995). Probabilistic methods in geotechnical engineering. Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
22.
Poeter, E. P., and McKenna, S. A. (1995). “Reducing uncertainty associated with ground-water flow and transport prediction.” Ground Water, 33(6), 899–904.
23.
Reeves, H. W., Dowding, C., and Igusa, T. ( 1998). “An efficient reliability based approach to aquifer remediation design” EPA Res. Proj., 98 NCERQA, EPA, Washington, D.C.
24.
Ripley, B. D. (1987). Stochastic simulation. Wiley, New York, 237.
25.
Shackelford, C. D., Nelson, P. P., and Roth, M. J. S., eds. (1996). Uncertainty in the geologic environment: From theory to practice, Geotech. Spec. Publ. No. 58, ASCE, New York.
26.
Smith, A. D. ( 1989). “Computerized modeling of geotechnical stratigraphic data,” PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mass.
27.
Tomasko, D., Reeves, M., Kelley, V. A., and Pickens, J. F. (1987). “Parameter Sensitivity and Importance for Radionuclide Transport in Double-Porosity Systems.” Proc., Conf. on Geostatistical, Sensitivity, and Uncertainty Methods for Ground-Water Flow and Radionuclide Transport Modeling, Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, 297–321.
28.
Wilson, J. L., and Metcalfe, D. E. (1985). “Illustration and verification of adjoint sensitivity theory for steady state groundwater flow.” Water Resour. Res., 21(11), 1602–1610.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 125Issue 11November 1999
Pages: 959 - 967

History

Received: Apr 9, 1998
Published online: Nov 1, 1999
Published in print: Nov 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Member, ASCE
Member, ASCE
Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487.
Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL 60208.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share