Impulse Response Evaluation of Drilled Shafts
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 124, Issue 10
Abstract
A test section was constructed at the National Geotechnical Experimentation Site at Northwestern University to assess the applicability of nondestructive testing methods to evaluate deep foundations under inaccessible-head conditions. Tests were performed in both the accessible and the inaccessible conditions to evaluate the effects of intervening structure. This paper focuses on the results of impulse response tests performed on the National Geotechnical Experimentation Site drilled shafts before the pile caps were constructed, i.e., in an accessible-head condition. Based on field experimentation and numerical simulations, the use of impulse response tests to identify lengths of accessible-head shafts is limited primarily by the L/D ratio of the shaft, the ratio of the shear-wave velocity of the soil to the propagation velocity of the concrete, and soil stratigraphy. The length of a drilled shaft can be found to within ±5% based solely on errors in assumed propagation velocities. Site-specific construction procedures may be important when interpreting the results of impulse response tests because the soil immediately adjacent to a shaft has a large effect on the resolution of the signals in a mobility plot.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baker, C. N., and Khan, F.(1971). “Caisson construction problems and correction in Chicago.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 97(2), 417–440.
2.
Caputo, V. (1994). “Low-strain dynamic testing on piles.”A Workshop in Pile Found.: Experimental Investigations, Anal. and Des., Università Degli Studi Di Napoli Federico II, Italy, 165–198.
3.
Davis, A. G. (1994). Impedance log for the length and shape measurements of drilled shafts from mobility (TDR) tests. Computer program, STS Consultants, Inc. Northbrook, Ill.
4.
Davis, A. G., and Dunn, C. S. (1974). “From theory to field experience with non-destructive vibration testing of piles.”Proc., Inst. of Civ. Engrs., London, U.K., 571–593.
5.
Davis, A. G., and Robertson, S. A. (1975). “Economic pile testing.”Ground Engrg., London, U.K., May, 40–43.
6.
Finno, R. J., Gassman, S. L., and Osborn, P. W. (1997). “Non-destructive evaluation of a deep foundation test section at the Northwestern University National Geotechnical Experimentation Site.”Res. Rep., Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
7.
Gassman, S. L. (1997). “Impulse response evaluation of inaccessible foundations,” PhD dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
8.
Hearne, T. M., Stokoe, K. H., and Reese, L. C.(1981). “Drilled-shaft integrity by wave propagation method.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 107(10), 1327–1344.
9.
Higgs, J. S., and Robertson, S. A. (1979). “Integrity testing of concrete piles by shock method.”Concrete, October, 31–33.
10.
Imai, T., and Tonouchi, K. (1982). “Correlation of N-value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus.”Proc., 2nd Eur. Symp. on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 57–72.
11.
Mayne, P. W., and Rix, G. J.(1993). “Gmax-qc relationship for clays.”Geotech. Testing J., 16(1), 54–60.
12.
Olson, L. D., and Wright, C. C. (1989). “Nondestructive testing of deep foundations with sonic methods.”Proc., foundation engineering: Current principles and practices, Vol. 2, F. H. Kulhawy, ed., ASCE, Evanston, Ill., 1173–1183.
13.
Paquet, J. (1968). “Etude vibratoire des pieux en beton: Response harmonique.”Annales Inst. Tech. Batim., 245(May), 789–803.
14.
Rix, G. J., and Stokoe, K. H. (1991). “Correlation of initial tangent modulus and cone penetration resistance.”Calibration Chamber Testing, Int. Symp. on Calibration Chamber Testing, A. B. Huang, ed., Elsevier Publishing, New York, N.Y., 351–362.
15.
Sansalone, M., and Carino, N. J. (1986). “Impact-echo: A method for flaw detection in concrete using transient stress wave analysis.”Rep. No. NBSIR 86-3452, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Md.
16.
Stas, C., and Kulhawy, F. H. (1984). “Critical evaluation of design methods for foundations under axial uplift and compression loading.”Rep. No. EPRI EL-3771, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif.
17.
Timoshenko, S. P., and Goodier, J. N. (1970). Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 124 • Issue 10 • October 1998
Pages: 965 - 975
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1998
Published in print: Oct 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.