TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 1, 1997

Cyclic Interface and Joint Shear Device Including Pore Pressure Effects

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 6

Abstract

An understanding of the mechanical behavior of saturated interfaces between structural and geologic materials and joints in rock, subjected to cyclic earthquake-type loading, is important for safe and improved analysis and design of many geotechnical structures. Appropriate testing is vital for the determination of parameters in constitutive models to characterize the mechanical response in terms of stress-strain and failure behavior. The cyclic multi–degree-of-freedom (CYMDOF-P) testing device described here is new and unique in the sense that it allows integration of a number of important factors—such as pore-water pressures, direct and simple shear deformations, drained and undrained conditions, and static and cyclic loading—that were not available in previous devices. Typical laboratory test results to show the validity of the device, and brief statement of unified constitutive models that can be developed based on the test data are presented.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Alanazy, A., and Desai, C. S. (1996). “Cyclic testing and modelling of saturated sand-steel interfaces.”Rep. Prepared for NSF, Dept. of Civ. Engrg. and Engrg. Mech., The Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
2.
Bogard, D., and Matlock, H. (1979). “A model study of axially loaded pile segments including pore pressure measurements.”Rep. Prepared for Am. Petr. Inst. Austin, Tex.
3.
Brummund, N. F., and Leonards, G. A. (1973). “Experimental study of static and dynamic friction between sand and typical construction materials.”J. Testing and Evaluation, ASTM, Vol. 1(2), 162–165.
4.
Byerlee, J. D.(1967). “Frictional characteristics of granite under high confining pressure.”J. Geophys. Res., 72(14), 3639–3648.
5.
Christensen, R. J., Swanson, S. R., and Brown, W. (1974). “A torsional shear measurement of the frictional properties of westerly granite.”Proc., 3rd Congr. Int. Soc. of Rock Mech., Vol. 2, Part A, 221–225.
6.
Clough, G. W., and Duncan, J. M. (1971). “Finite element analyses of retaining wall behavior.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 97(12).
7.
Coulson, J. H. (1972). “Shear strength of flat surfaces in rock.”Proc., 13th Symp. on Rock Mech., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 77–105.
8.
Coyle, H. M., and Sulaiman, I.(1967). “Skin friction for steel piles in sand.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., ASCE, 93(6), 261–278.
9.
Crawford, A. M., and Curran, J. H.(1981). “The influence of shear velocity on the frictional resistance of rock discontinuities.”Int. J. Rock Mech. and Min. Sci., 18(6), 505–515.
10.
Desai, C. S. (1974). “Numerical design analysis of piles in sand.”J. Geotech. Engrg., Div., ASCE, 100(5).
11.
Desai, C. S. (1980). “A dynamic multi-degree-of-freedom shear device.”Rep. No. 18-36, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Virginia Polytech. Univ. and State Univ., Blacksburg, Va.
12.
Desai, C. S. (1981). “Behavior of interfaces between structural and geologic media.”State-of-the-Art Paper; Proc., Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotech. Earthquake Engrg. and Soil Dyn., Univ. of Missouri at Rolla, MO.
13.
Desai, C. S. (1995). “Constitutive modelling using the disturbed state as microstructure self-adjustment concept.”Continuum models for materials with microstructure, H. B. Mühlhaus, ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, U.K., 239–296.
14.
Desai, C. S., Drumm, E. C., and Zaman, M. M. (1985). “Cyclic testing and modeling of interfaces.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 111(6), 793–815.
15.
Desai, C. S., and Fishman, K. L.(1991). “Plasticity based constitutive model with associated testing for joints.”Int. J. Rock. Mech. and Min. Sci., 28(1), 15–26.
16.
Desai, C. S., and Holloway, D. M. (1972). “Load-deformation analysis of deep pile foundations.”Proc., Symp. on Appl. Finite Element Method, U.S. Wtrwy Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
17.
Desai, C. S., and Ma, Y.(1992). “Modelling of joints and interfaces using the disturbed state concept.”Int. J. Numer. and Analytical Methods in Geomech., 16(9), 623–653.
18.
Desai, C. S., and Nagaraj, B. K.(1988). “Modeling for normal and shear behavior at contacts and interfaces.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 114(7), 1198–1217.
19.
Desai, C. S., Samtani, N. C., and Vulliet, L.(1995). “Constitutive modeling and analysis of creeping slopes.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 121(1), 43–56.
20.
Desai, C. S., and Toth, J.(1996). “Disturbed state modelling based on stress-strain and nondestructive behavior.”Int. J. Solids and Struct., 33(11), 1619–1650.
21.
Desai, C. S., Wathugala, G. W., and Matlock, H.(1993). “Constitutive model for cyclic behavior of cohesive soils. II: Applications.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 119(4), 730–748.
22.
Dover, A. R., Bamford, S. R., and Suarez, L. F. (1982). “Rod shear interface friction tests in sands, silts and clays.”Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Behavior of Offshore Struct., Vol. 2, Hemisphere Publ. Corp., Washington, D.C., 305–314.
23.
Drumm, E. C., and Desai, C. S.(1986). “Determination of parameters for a model for the cyclic behavior of interfaces.”Int. J. Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., 14, 1–18.
24.
Earth Technology Corporation. (1986). “Pile segment tests—Sabine Pass; some aspects of the fundamental behavior of axially loaded piles in clay soils.”ETC Rep. No. 85-007, Houston, Tex.
25.
Fakharian, K., and Evgin, E. (1993). “A Three-dimensional apparatus for cyclic testing of interfaces.”Proc., 46th Can. Geotech. Conf., 485–493.
26.
Fakharian, K., and Evgin, E. (1995). “Simple shear versus direct shear tests on interfaces during cyclic loading.”Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Recent Adv. in Geotech. Earthquake Engrg. and Soil Dyn., Vol. III, S. Prakash, ed., Univ. of Missouri at Rolla, Mo., 13–16.
27.
Fakharian, K., and Evgin, E.(1996). “An automated apparatus for three-dimensional monotonic and cyclic testing of interfaces.”Geotech. Testing J., 19(1), 22–31.
28.
Felio, G. Y., and Briaud, J. L.(1986). “Procedure for a rod shear test.”Geotech. Testing J., 9(3), 133–139.
29.
Flaate, K.(1992). “Effects of pile driving in clay.”Can. Geotech. J., Ottawa, Canada, 9(1), 81–88.
30.
Franklin, J. A.(1985). “A direct shear machine for testing rock joints.”Geotech. Testing J., 8(1), 25–29.
31.
Gillette, D. R. (1983). “Undrained shear behavior of rock joints under dynamic loading,”MS thesis, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
32.
Goodman, R. E. (1974). “The mechanical properties of joints.”Proc., 3rd Congr. Int. Soc. of Rock Mech., Vol. 1, Part A, U.S. Nat. Committee on Rock Mech., 127–140.
33.
Goodman, R. E., and Ohnishi, Y.(1973). “Undrained shear testing of jointed rock.”Rock Mech., 5, 129.
34.
Gould, M. C. (1982). “Development of high capacity dynamic direct shear apparatus and its application to testing sandstone rock joints,”MS thesis, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
35.
Grosch, J. J., and Reese, L. C. (1980). “Field tests of small-scale pile segments in a soft clay deposit under repeated axial loading.”Rep. Prepared for Am. Petro. Inst., Austin, Tex.
36.
Huang, X., Haimen, B. C., Plesha, M. E., and Qiu, X.(1993). “An investigation of the mechanics of rock joints—Part I. Laboratory investigation.”Int. J. Rock Mech. and Min. Sci., 30(3), 257–269.
37.
Huck, P. J. (1974). “Dynamic response of soil/concrete interfaces at high pressure. Rep. No. AIWC-TR-73-264 Prepared for Defense Nuclear Agency, Washington, D.C., IITRI, Chicago, Ill.
38.
Jaeger, J. G.(1959). “The frictional properties of joints in rock.”Pure Appl. Geophys., 43, 148–158.
39.
Katti, D. R., and Desai, C. S.(1995). “Modeling and testing of cohesive soil using disturbed state concept.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 121(5), 648–658.
40.
Krsmanovic, D., and Popovic, M. (1967). “Large scale tests of the shear strength of limestone.”Proc., 1st Engrg. Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Vol. 1, 773–779.
41.
Kulhawy, F. H., and Peterson, M. S. (1979). “Behavior of sand-concrete interfaces.”Proc., 6th Pan-Am. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., Vol. 2, 225–236.
42.
Kutter, H. K. (1974). “Rotary shear testing of rock joints.”Proc., 3rd Congr. Int. Soc. of Rock Mech., Vol. 2, Part A, 254–262.
43.
Lemos, L. (1986). “The effect of rate on residual strength of soil,”PhD thesis, Imperial Coll. of Sci. and Technol., London, England.
44.
Locker, H. G. (1968). “Some results of direct shear tests on rock discontinuities.”Proc., Int. Symp. Rock Mech., 171–173.
45.
Martin, G. R., and Miller, P. J. (1974). “Joint strength characteristics of a weathered rock.”Proc., 3rd Congr., Int. Soc. of Rock Mech., Vol. 2, Part A, 276–281.
46.
Matlock, H., and Lade, P. V. (1992). “Field and laboratory testing.”Proc., U.S.-Canada Workshop on Recent Accomplishments and Future Trends in Geomech. in the 21st Century, M. Zaman, C. S. Desai, and A. P. S. Selvadurai, eds., Nat. Sci. Found., Washington, D.C., 58.
47.
Mouchaorab, K. S., and Benmorkrane, B.(1994). “A new combined servo-controlled loading frame/direct-shear apparatus for the study of concrete or rock joint behavior under different boundary and loading conditions.”J. of Geotech. Testing, 17(2), 233–242.
48.
Nikitin, A. A., and Sapegin, D. C. (1974). “Shear resistance of rock along planes under static and impulse loads.”Proc., 3rd Congr., Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Vol. 2, Part A.
49.
O'Neill, M. W., and Reese, L. C.(1972). “Behavior of bored piles in Beaumont clay.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 98(2), 195–213.
50.
Paikowsky, S. G., Player, C. M., and Connors, P. J.(1995). “A dual interface apparatus for testing unrestricted friction of soil along solid surfaces.”J. Geotech. Testing, 18(2), 168–193.
51.
Potyondy, J. G.(1961). “Skin friction between various soils and construction materials.”Geotechnique, London, England, 11(4), 339–353.
52.
Pratt, H. R., Black, A. D., and Brace, W. F. (1974). “Friction and deformation of jointed quartz dionite.”Proc., 3rd Congr., Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Vol. 2, Part A, 306–310.
53.
Rigby, D. B., and Desai, C. S. (1988). “Cyclic shear device for interfaces and joints with pore water pressure.”Rep. Prepared for NSF, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., The Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
54.
Rigby, D. B., and Desai, C. S. (1996). “Modelling of interface behavior using cyclic multi-degree-of-freedom shear device with pore water pressures.”Rep. Prepared for NSF, Dept. of Civil Engrg., The Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
55.
Ross-Brown, D. M., and Walton, G. (1975). “A portable shear box for testing rock joints.”Rock Mech. 7, 129–153.
56.
Samtani, N. C., and Desai, C. S. (1991). “Constitutive modelling and finite element analysis of slowly moving landslides using hierarchical viscoplastic material model.”Rep. Prepared for NSF, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., The Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
57.
Schneider, H. J. (1974). “Rock friction—a laboratory investigation.”Proc., 3rd Congr. Int. Soc. Rock, Mech., Vol. 2, Part A, U.S. Nat. Committee of Rock Mech., 311–315.
58.
Smith, M. E., and Criley, K. (1995). “Interface shear strength is not for the uninitiated.”Geotech. Fabric Rep., 28–31.
59.
Tomlinson, M. J. (1957). “The adhesion of piles in clay soils.”Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., Vol. II.
60.
Tsubakihara, Y., and Kishida, H. (1993). “Frictional behavior between normally consolidated clay and steel by two direct shear type apparatuses.”Soils and Found. 33(2), 1–13.
61.
Uesugi, M., and Kishida, H. (1986). “Influential factors of friction between steel and dry sands.”Soils and Found. 26(2), 33–46.
62.
Vulliet, L. (1986). “Modelisation des Pentes Natureles en Mouvement,” PhD thesis, No. 635, Ecole Polytech. Federale de Laussane, Switzerland (in French).
63.
Walt, W. G., Kurfurst, P. J., and Zamen, Z. P. (1969). “Comparison of pile load test skin friction values and laboratory strength tests.”Can. Geotech. J., Ottawa, Canada, 6(3).
64.
Wathugala, G. W., and Desai, C. S.(1993). “Constitutive model for cyclic behavior of cohesive soils. I: Theory.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 119(4), 714–729.
65.
Yoshini, Y., and Kishida, T.(1981). “A ring torsion apparatus for evaluating friction between soils and metal surfaces.”Geotech. Testing J., 4(4), 145–152.
66.
Zaman, M. M., Desai, C. S., and Drumm, E. C.(1984). “An interface model for dynamic soil-structure interaction.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 110(9), 1257–1273.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 123Issue 6June 1997
Pages: 568 - 579

History

Published online: Jun 1, 1997
Published in print: Jun 1997

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chandra S. Desai, Fellow, ASCE,
Regents' Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg. and Engrg. Mech., The Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Douglas B. Rigby, Student Member, ASCE
Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Hong Kong Univ. of Technol., Hong Kong; formerly, Grad. Res. Asst., Dept. of Civ. Engrg. and Engrg. Mech., The Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share