Comparison of Four Methods to Assess Hydraulic Conductivity
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 10
Abstract
A hydraulic conductivity assessment that was conducted on four test pads constructed to the same specifications with soil from the same source by four different contractors is described. The test pads had distinctly different field hydraulic conductivities, even though they were constructed with similar soil, to similar compaction conditions, and with similar machinery. Adequate hydration time was key in achieving low field hydraulic conductivity. More extensive processing was another factor responsible for low field hydraulic conductivity. Four different test methods were used to assess the hydraulic conductivity of each test pad: (1) sealed double-ring infiltrometers (SDRIs); (2) two-stage borehole permeameters; (3) laboratory hydraulic conductivity tests on large block specimens; and (4) laboratory hydraulic conductivity tests on small specimens collected in thin-wall sampling tubes. The tests were conducted independently by each of the writers. After the tests were completed, the results were submitted and compared. Analysis of the test results shows that the three large-scale test methods generally yield similar hydraulic conductivities. For two of the test pads, however, the hydraulic conductivities of the specimens collected in sampling tubes were significantly lower than the field hydraulic conductivities. Both of these test pads had high field hydraulic conductivity. Thus, there is little value in using small specimens to assess field hydraulic conductivity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Benson, C. (1993). “Sampling and hydraulic conductivity testing of block specimens from four test pads—final report.”Report, IT Corp., Austin, Tex.
2.
Benson, C. (1994). “Research developments in clay liner construction.”Proc., 32nd Annu. Int. Solid Waste Exposition, Solid Waste Assn. of North Am., Silver Spring, Md., 81–93.
3.
Benson, C., and Boutwell, G. (1992). “Compaction control and scale-dependent hydraulic conductivity of clay liners.”Proc., 15th Madison Waste Conf., Dept. of Engrg. Profl. Devel., Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, 62–83.
4.
Benson, C., and Daniel, D.(1994). “Minimum thickness of compacted soil liners: I-stochastic models.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 120(1), 129–152.
5.
Benson, C., Chamberlain, E., Erickson, A., and Wang, X.(1995). “Assessing frost damage in compacted soil liners.”Geotech. Testing J., 18(3), 324–333.
6.
Benson, C., Zhai, H., and Rashad, S.(1994b). “Statistical sample size for construction of soil liners.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 120(10), 1704–1724.
7.
Benson, C., Zhai, H., and Wang, X.(1994a). “Estimating hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay liners.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 120(2), 366–387.
8.
Christie, C., and Gunter, J. (1993). “Test fill construction and sealed double ring infiltrometer test, Hoechst Celanese, Pampa, TX.”Rep. by IT Corp., Austin, Tex. to Hoechst Celanese, Inc., Pampa, Tex.
9.
Daniel, D.(1989). “In situ hydraulic conductivity tests for compacted clays.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 115(9), 1205–1226.
10.
Daniel, D., and Benson, C.(1990). “Water content-density criteria for compacted soil liners.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 116(12), 1811–1830.
11.
Koerner, R., and Daniel, D. (1993). “Quality assurance and quality control for waste containment facilities.”Rep. No. EPA/600/R-93/182, U.S. EPA, Ofc. of Res. and Devel., Washington, D.C.
12.
Othman, M., Benson, C., Chamberlain, E., and Zimmie, T. (1994). “Laboratory testing to evaluate changes in hydraulic conductivity caused by freeze-thaw: state-of-the-art.”Hydr. Conductivity and Waste Containment Transport in Soil, ASTM STP 1142, 227–254.
13.
Sowers, G. (1979). Introductory soil mechanics and foundations: geotechnical engineering. Macmillan Inc., Greenwich, Conn.
14.
Trast, J., and Benson, C.(1995). “Estimating field hydraulic conductivity at various effective stresses.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 121(10), 736–740.
15.
Trautwein, S., and Boutwell, G. (1994). “In-situ hydraulic conductivity tests for compacted soil liners and caps.”Hydraulic conductivity and waste contaminant transport in soil, ASTM STP 1142, D. Daniel and S. Trautwein, eds., 184–226.
16.
Trautwein, S., and Williams, C. (1990). “Performance evaluation of earthen liners.”Waste containment systems, GSP No. 26, ASCE, R. Bonaparte, ed., 30–51.
17.
Wang, X., and Benson, C.(1995). “Infiltration and saturated hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 121(10), 713–722.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 123 • Issue 10 • October 1997
Pages: 929 - 937
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1997
Published in print: Oct 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.