Structural Behavior of Short Span Precast Channel Beam Bridges without Shear Reinforcement
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 12, Issue 6
Abstract
This paper presents findings of a research study conducted by the writers for the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. The study investigated precast nonprestressed concrete channel beam sections cast without shear reinforcement used in short, multispan bridges. The original objective of the study was to establish a correlation for inspection purposes between the beam’s visual deteriorated state and its corresponding approximate structural capacity. However, during four-point load testing of 33 beams, it was found that beam strength was more a function of a beam’s concrete compression strength rather than deterioration state. A national survey of state transportation departments within the contiguous states was conducted by the authors and found that 13 states currently use precast channel beam bridges. The particular section considered in this paper is a precast channel beam section used to cross small streams and depressions; however constructed without shear reinforcing steel. Bridges using these sections were constructed in the 1950s through to the early 1970s and were designed for H15 loading. Thirty-three formally in-service beams, in various states of deterioration, were load tested. The writers found that the majority of the beams exhibited load capacity greater than the initially required H15 design strength. Second, member strength was a function of concrete compressive strength. Of the 33 beams load tested, 28 beams showed ductile behavior; conversely, the other five beams failed without exhibiting a yield plateau.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers wish to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD). The findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented herein are those of the writers and not necessarily those of the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department. The writers would also like to acknowledge the contributions of Mr. Mark Kuss, University of Arkansas Master Scientific Research Technologist. In addition, the writers acknowledge Jarrod Burns and Keith Tencleve for their work in inspecting PCB bridges throughout the state for this study.
References
AASHTO. (1994). Manual for condition evaluation of bridges, 2nd Ed., Washington, D.C.
AASHTO. (2005). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 3rd Ed., Washington, D.C.
Arkansas State Highway Commission. (1952). Standard design: Precast concrete bridges, Little Rock, Ark.
ASTM. (2001). “Test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” ASTM C39/C 39M, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM. (1999). “Standard test method for water-soluble chloride in mortar and concrete.” ASTM C 1218/C 1218M-99, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Durham, S. A., Heymsfield, E., Schemmel, J. J., and Jones, J. X. (2004). “The structural evaluation of precast concrete slab panels in bridge superstructures.” Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Dept., Ark.
Emmons, P. H. (1993). Concrete repair and maintenance illustrated, R.S. Means, Kingston, Mass.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1988). “Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges.” Rep. No. FHWA-ED-89-044, OMB No. 2125, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Jones, J. X. (2003). “Fiber reinforced polymer shear strengthening of short span precast concrete channel beams.” MS thesis, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Ark.
Klaiber, F. W., Wipf, T. J., Nahra, M. J., Ingersoll, J. S., Sardo, A. G., and Qin, X. (2001). “Field and laboratory evaluation of precast concrete bridges.” Iowa DOT Project No. TR-440, Iowa Department of Transportation, Iowa.
Yoon, S., Wang, K., Weiss, J., and Shah, S. (2000). “Interaction between loading, corrosion, and serviceability of reinforced concrete.” ACI Mater. J., 97(6), 637–644.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 3, 2006
Accepted: Nov 2, 2006
Published online: Nov 1, 2007
Published in print: Nov 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.