Structural Analyses of Two Historic Covered Wooden Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 9, Issue 6
Abstract
Structural analyses were conducted of two covered wooden bridges still in use in the Summer of 2002. The Pine Grove Bridge and Brown Bridge represent the 19th century truss forms of the Burr-arch truss and the Town-lattice truss, respectively. In the Burr-arch truss, the arch is shown to be dominant in carrying the dead load of the bridge, while the truss, following simple beam behavior, primarily provides resistance against concentrated live loads. The use of camber and a common retrofit of steel ties are found to have varied effects. The Town-lattice truss is found to follow simple beam behavior with stress concentrations at the supports. Studies are conducted to highlight the sizing and placement of the chords, the behavior and advantages of bolster beams, and the sizing and placement of the lattice members. It is hoped that this study may aid those wishing to better understand these bridges’ historic significance and demonstrate how modern engineering analysis may aid our understanding of historic bridges.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Forest and Paper Association (AFPA). (1997). National design specification for wood construction, American Wood Council, Washington, D.C.
2.
American Institute of Timber Construction (AITC). (1994). Timber construction manual, Englewood, Colo.
3.
Forest Products Laboratory (FPL). (1999). Wood handbook—Wood as an engineering material, Madison, Wis.
4.
Historic American Engineering Record (HAER). (2003a). “Brown Bridge.” HAER No. VT-28, Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress. Washington, D.C.
5.
Historic American Engineering Record (HAER). (2003b). “Pine Grove Bridge.” HAER No. PA-586, Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress. Washington, D.C.
6.
James, J. G. (1982). “The evolution of wooden bridge trusses to 1850.” J. Inst. Wood Sci. 9(3), 116–135;
IBID9(4), 168–193.
7.
Kemp, E. L., and Hall, J. (1975). “Case study of Burr truss covered bridge.” Eng. Issues, 101(3), 391–412.
8.
McGuire, W., Gallagher, R.H., and Ziemian, R.D. (1999). Matrix structural analysis with MASTAN2, Wiley, New York.
9.
Pierce, P.C. (1999). Chapter 15: “Covered bridges.” Timber construction for architects and Builders, E. W. Goldstein, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
10.
Pierce, P. C. (2001). “Those intriguing Town-lattice timber trusses.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 3(3), 92–94.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 15, 2004
Published in print: Nov 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.