Forces in Wingwalls of Skewed Semi-Integral Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 9, Issue 6
Abstract
In theory, semi-integral bridges with skewed approaches have a tendency to rotate toward the acute corners due to thermal expansion. This movement causes force to be transferred into the wingwalls that are often designed only as retaining walls. The wingwall/diaphragm joint of two semi-integral bridges were instrumented and monitored in the state of Ohio. Information pertaining to the thermal expansion was successfully compiled during the extent of this research and showed wingwalls’ forces can reach magnitudes of . The maximum longitudinal movement measured and the maximum movement into the wingwall measured as . The effects of skew and span on the wingwall forces were also modeled and presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barker, R., Duncan, J., Rojiani, K., Ooi, P., Tan, C., and Kim, S. ( 1991). “Manuals for the design of bridge foundations.” NCHRP 343, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
2.
Bettinger, C. ( 2001). “Effects of thermal expansion on a skewed semi-integral bridge.” Masters thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ohio Univ., Athens, Ohio.
3.
Bowles, J.E. ( 1996). Foundation analysis and design, 5th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
4.
Bridge design manual. (2000). Ohio Department of Transportation, Office of Structural Engineering, Columbus, Ohio.
5.
Burke, M. P. ( 1994). “Semi-integral bridges: Movements and forces.” Transportation Research Record 1460, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–7.
6.
Burke, M. P. ( 1999). “Cracking of concrete decks and other problems with integral-type bridges.” Transportation Research Record, 1688, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 131–138.
7.
Luttenegger, A., Thompson, T., and Riccardi, C. ( 1997). “Passive earth pressures in integral abutments.” Technical Rep., Univ. of Massachusetts, Transportation Center, Amherst, Mass.
8.
Sanford, T. C., and Elgaaly, M. ( 1993). “Skew effects on backfill pressures at frame bridge abutments.” Transportation Research Record, 1415, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–10.
9.
State of the art of precast/prestressed integral bridges. (2001). Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago.
10.
Ting, J., and Faraji, S. ( 1998). “Streamlined analysis and design of integral abutment bridges.” Technical Rep., Univ. of Massachusetts, Transportation Center, Amherst, MA.
11.
Van Lund, J., and Brecto, B. ( 1999). “Jointless bridges and bridge deck joints in Washington state.” Transportation Research Record, 1688, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 116–123.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Oct 15, 2004
Published in print: Nov 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.