Behavior of Composite Bridge Decks with Alternative Shear Connectors
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 6, Issue 1
Abstract
An experimental study of composite bridge decks with alternative shear connectors has been performed. The alternative shear connector consists of concrete filled holes located in the webs of grid main bars and friction along the web embedded in the slab, which enables shear transfer between the concrete slab and steel grid. Results of static and fatigue tests on full-scale prototype decks indicated that composite action between the concrete slab and steel grid is maintained well above the service load range even after fatigue loading, the eventual loss of composite action at overload is gradual, failure was controlled by punching shear of the concrete slab and was unaffected by the shear connectors, and no significant change in behavior was observed due to fatigue loading. Further, the measured stress range at the shear connection location would not control the fatigue behavior of the deck in positive bending, and no fatigue cracking of the steel grid was observed in negative bending.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. ( 1994). AASHTO-LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, D.C.
2.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. ( 1996). Standard specifications for highway bridges, Washington, D.C.
3.
American Concrete Institute. ( 1995). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” ACI 318-95, Detroit.
4.
Exodermic Bridge Deck. ( 1997). “Exodermic bridge deck.” Product Literature, Lakeville, Conn.
5.
Higgins, C., and Mitchell, H. ( 1997). “Tests of a revised exodermic bridge deck design.” Rep. No. 97-16, Clarkson University, Potsdam, N.Y.
6.
Leonhardt, E. F., Andra, W., Andra, H-P., and Harre, W. ( 1987). “New improved shear connector with high fatigue strength for composite structures.” Benton-Und Stahlbentonbau, 12, 325–331 (in German).
7.
Nishimura, A., Okumura, T., and Ariga, Y. ( 1971). “Shear connector utilizing the reinforcing steels in composite girder slab.” Proc., Symp. on New Techniques in Constr. of Struct., 17th Nat. Symp. on Bridge and Struct. Engrg., Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, 35–47.
8.
Oguejiofor, E. C., and Hosain, M. U. ( 1992). “Behavior of perfobond rib shear connectors in composite beams: Full-size tests.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 19, 224–235.
9.
Oguejiofor, E. C., and Hosain, M. U. ( 1994). “A parametric study of perfobond rib shear connectors.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 21, 614–625.
10.
Roberts, W., and Heywood, R. ( 1995). “Development and testing of a new shear connector for steel concrete composite bridges.” 4th Int. Bridge Engrg. Conf., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 137–145.
11.
Velanda, M. R., and Hosain, M. U. ( 1992). “Behavior of perfobond rib shear connectors: Push-out tests.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 19, 1–10.
12.
Zellner, W. ( 1987). “Recent designs of composite bridges and a new type of shear connectors.” Compos. Constr. in Steel and Concrete, Proc., Engrg. Found. Conf., New England College, Henniker, N.H., 240–252.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: May 24, 1999
Published online: Feb 1, 2001
Published in print: Feb 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.