Survey and Evaluation of Damaged Concrete Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 1
Abstract
It is well known that the U.S. bridge inventory stands in need of repair. For a rational allocation of U.S. investment resources to bridge maintenance, life cycle cost and probabilistic methods must be used. This requires a quantitative estimate of the remaining strength over the intended lifespan for a given bridge. Although nondestructive evaluation methods are becoming established for bridge inspection purposes, specific recommendations for the application of these methods for individual bridges do not exist. This study focuses on reported damage and damage modeling for concrete bridges, with particular attention to Colorado bridges. A survey on degradation mechanisms is briefly presented. Bridge damage is reviewed for a variety of concrete bridges based on information in the literature and from field studies performed by the Colorado Department of Transportation. A catalog of damages and examples that illustrate the variety and severity of damage in these bridges are presented. For the bridges considered in the survey, the most common source of damage is water leaking through deck joints. A method for predicting strength loss is applied to a typical bridge in Colorado. It is shown that corrosion initiation occurs more quickly and normalized strength loss is much greater for shear than for flexure. It is also shown that many reinforced concrete bridges under corrosion attack may be more vulnerable to shear than to bending failure. The results can be used to identify critical elements for inspection and repair, and to assist in the development of rational maintenance planning strategies for concrete bridges.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Borgard, B., Warren, C., Somayaji, S., and Heidersbach, R. ( 1989). “Correlation between corrosion of reinforcing steel and voids and cracks in concrete structures.” TRR 1211, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1–9.
2.
Bridge plans for Colorado Bridge L-18-BG. (1962). Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, Colo.
3.
Colorado Department of Transportation. ( 1997). Staff Bridge Inspection Branch, Denver, Co.
4.
Crumpton, C. F., and Bukovatz, J. E. ( 1974). “Corrosion and Kansas bridges.” TRR 500, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 25–31.
5.
Enright, M. P. ( 1998). “Time-variant reliability of reinforced concrete bridges under environmental attack,” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civ., Envir., and Arch. Engrg., University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
6.
Enright, M. P., and Frangopol, D. M. (1998a). “Probablistic analysis of resistance degradation of reinforced concrete bridge beams under corrosion.” Engrg. Struct., 20(11), 960–971.
7.
Enright, M. P., and Frangopol, D. M. (1998b). “Service-life prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 124(3), 309–317.
8.
Enright, M. P., Frangopol, D. M., and Hearn, G. ( 1996). “Degradation of reinforced concrete bridges under aggressive conditions.” Materials for the new millennium, K. P. Chong, ed., American Soc. of Civil Engineers, New York, 2, 978–987.
9.
Frangopol, D. M., Lin, K.-Y., and Estes, A. C. (1997a). “Reliability of reinforced concrete girders under corrosion attack.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 123(3), 286–297.
10.
Frangopol, D. M., Lin, K.-Y., and Estes, A. C. (1997b). “Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 123(10), 1390–1401.
11.
Jones, N. P., and Ellingwood, B. (1992). “NDE of concrete bridges: Opportunities and research needs.” FHWA-RD-93-040A, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2:1–52.
12.
Kayser, J. R., and Nowak, A. S. (1989). “Capacity loss due to corrosion in steel girder bridges.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 115(6), 1525–1537.
13.
LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. (1994). 1st Edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
14.
Mori, Y., and Ellingwood, B. (1993). “Methodology for reliability-based condition assessment: Application to concrete structures in nuclear plants.” NUREG/CR-6052, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
15.
Murray, V. E., and Frantz, G. C. ( 1991). “Tests on prestressed concrete bridge beams, part II—chloride penetration in the bridge beams.” Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Conn.
16.
Novokshchenov, V. (1989). “Condition survey of prestressed concrete bridges.” Concrete Int., 11(9), 60–68.
17.
Park, C.-H., and Nowak, A. S. ( 1997). “Lifetime reliability model for steel girder bridges.” Safety of bridges, P. C. Das, ed., Thomas Telford, London, 189–202.
18.
Schroff, A. C. (1988). “Evaluating a 50 year old concrete bridge.” Concrete Int. 10(5), 56–62.
19.
Thoft-Christensen, P., Jensen, F. M., Middleton, C. R., and Blackmore, A. ( 1997). “Revised rules for concrete bridges.” Safety of bridges, P. C. Das, ed., Thomas Telford, London, 175–188.
20.
Whiting, D. A., Stejskal, B. G., and Nagi, M. A. (1993). “Conditions of prestressed concrete bridge components: Technology review and field surveys.” FHWA-RD-93-037, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
21.
Woodward, R. J. ( 1989). “Collapse analysis of a segmented post-tensioned concrete bridge.” TRR 1211, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 38–59.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 5 • Issue 1 • February 2000
Pages: 31 - 38
History
Received: Jun 3, 1999
Published online: Feb 1, 2000
Published in print: Feb 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.