Dynamic Response and Fatigue of Steel Tied-Arch Bridge
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 1
Abstract
The Toutle River Bridge is a steel tied-arch bridge, one that vibrates extensively and has sustained significant fatigue cracking. An experimental study into the cause of this behavior is described. Computer analyses of the bridge behavior are used to estimate the expected response and to establish appropriate locations for instrumentation. The instruments were installed and field tests were performed. Controlled tests were performed with trucks of known axle weight and spacing. Some controlled tests were performed with trucks traveling at known speed and in a specific driving lane with no other traffic on the bridge. Controlled tests were used to calibrate the instrumentation and establish the basic bridge behavior. The results showed that composite action had been lost in the heavily loaded stringers, and little amplification of dynamic response was noted. The measured periods of vibration generally compared well with computer predictions. Uncontrolled truck traffic was then measured for approximately one month. This data was used to establish load spectra and to estimate the fatigue life of critical components. Fatigue, which is caused by calculated stress ranges, should not be important on this bridge for another 20 to 30 years. Existing fatigue damage is driven by distortional fatigue caused by the large bridge deformations. Several options for dealing with the problem are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Arima, K. ( 1997). “Comparison of the Lewis River Bridge and the Toutle River Bridge floor system behavior,” thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of MS degree, University of Washington, Seattle.
2.
Crocker, P. N. ( 1997). “Behavior and fatigue of the Toutle River Bridge, a tied-arch bridge on Interstate 5, Castle Rock, WA,” thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of MS degree, University of Washington, Seattle.
3.
Fisher, J., Yen, B. T., and Wang, D. (1987). “Fatigue and fracture evaluation for rating riveted bridges.” NCHRP Rep. 302, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
4.
Guide specifications for fatigue evaluation of existing steel bridges. (1990). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
5.
Kulicki, J. M., Mertz, D. R., and Murphy, R. E. (1989). “Dynamic response and proposed retrofit of two tied-arch bridges.” Paper No. IBC-98-7, Proc., 6th Int. Bridge Conf., Engineers Society of Western Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Pa., 12–22.
6.
Miner, M. A. (1945). “Cumulative damage in fatigue.” J. Appl. Mech., 12, A159–A164.
7.
Standard specification for highway bridges. (1996). 15th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
8.
Yam, M. C. H., and Cheng, J. J. R. (1990). “Fatigue strength of coped steel beams.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(9), 2447–2463.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 5 • Issue 1 • February 2000
Pages: 14 - 21
History
Received: Feb 25, 1998
Published online: Feb 1, 2000
Published in print: Feb 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.