Simply Supported Curved Cellular Bridges: Simplified Design Method
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 2
Abstract
The use of curved composite bridges in interchanges of modern highway systems has become increasingly popular for economic and aesthetic considerations. Bridges with a concrete deck composite with a steel multicell section can adequately resist torsional and warping effects induced by high curvature. Although current design practices in North America recommend few analytical methods for the design of curved multicell box girder bridges, economical requirements in the design process point to a need for a simplified design method. This paper summarizes the results from an extensive parametric study, using the finite-element method, in which simply supported curved composite multicell bridge prototypes are analyzed to evaluate the moment and deflection distributions between girders, as well as the axial forces expected in the bracing system, due to truck loading as well as dead load. Results from tests on four, 1/12 linear-scale, simply supported curved composite concrete deck-steel multicell bridge models are used to substantiate and verify the analytical modeling. The parameters considered in the study are cross-bracing system, aspect ratio, number of lanes, number of cells, and degree of curvature. Based on the data generated from the parametric study, expressions for moment and deflection distribution factors are deduced. Expressions for the maximum axial force in bracing members are also derived. An illustrative design example is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Brighton, J., Newell, J., and Scanlon, A. ( 1996). “Live load distribution factors for double cell box girders.” Proc., 1st Struct. Spec. Conf., Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Alberta, Canada, 419–430.
2.
“Canadian highway bridge design code, CHBDC.” (1996). Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Downsview, ON, Canada.
3.
Choudhury, D., and Scordelis, A. C. ( 1988). “Structural analysis and response of curved prestressed concrete box girder bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1180, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 72–86.
4.
Davis, R. E., and Bon, V. D. ( 1981). “Transverse distribution of loads in box girder bridges (volume 7): Correction for curvature.” Final Rep. No. FHWA-CA-5D-81-16, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif.
5.
Galdos, N. H. ( 1988). “A theoretical investigation of the dynamic behaviour of horizontally curved steel box girder bridges under truck loadings,” PhD thesis, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Md.
6.
“Geometric design standards for Ontario highways.” (1985). Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Downsview, ON, Canada.
7.
“Guide specification for horizontally curved highway bridges.” (1993). AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
8.
Heins, C. P. ( 1978). “Box girder bridge design-state-of-the-art.” AISC Engrg. J., 2, 126–142.
9.
Hibbitt, H. D., Karlson, B. I., and Sorenson, E. P. ( 1996). ABAQUS version 5.5, finite-element program. Providence, R.I.
10.
Li, W. Y., Tham, L. G., and Cheung, Y. K. (1988). “Curved box-girder bridges.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 114(6), 1324–1338.
11.
Mukherjee, D., and Trikha, D. N. ( 1980). “Design coefficient for curved box girder concrete bridges.” Indian Concrete J., Bombay, 54(11), 301–306.
12.
Ng, S. F., Cheung, M. S., and Hachem, H. M. ( 1993). “Study of a curved continuous composite box girder bridge.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 20, 107–119.
13.
Razaqpur, A. G., and Li, H. G. ( 1994). “Refined analysis of curved thin-walled multi-cell box girders.” Comp. and Struct., 53(1), 131–142.
14.
Sennah, K. M. ( 1998). “Load distribution and dynamic response of curved composite concrete deck-steel cellular bridges,” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada.
15.
Sennah, K. M., and Kennedy, J. B. ( 1997). “Dynamic characteristics of simply-supported curved composite multi-cell bridges.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Orrawa, 24, 621–636.
16.
Soliman, M. I. ( 1994). “Different aspects affecting the torsional stiffness of R.C. straight and curved box girder bridges.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Short and Medium Span Bridges, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Halifax, NS, Canada, 129–140.
17.
“Standard specifications for highway bridges.” (1996). AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
18.
Zokaie, T., Imbsen, R. A., and Osterkamp, T. A. ( 1991). “Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1290, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 119–126.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • May 1999
Pages: 85 - 94
History
Received: Mar 16, 1998
Published online: May 1, 1999
Published in print: May 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.