Cable Safety Factors for Four Suspension Bridge
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 4
Abstract
Four suspension bridges are studied: the Williamsburg (1903), Bear Mountain (1924), Triborough (1936), and Golden Gate (1937). Safety factors against failure are calculated for the main cables from original specifications as well as from actual cable wire tests performed at the time of construction. Using recent inspection reports, current safety factors against failure are computed for the main cables using a Type I Extreme Value Distribution. Two wire models are used: a more conservative Ductile-Brittle Wire Model (where wires with less than 0.6% elongation were considered brittle and are discounted) and a Ductile Wire Model (where only fractured wires are discounted). The number of fractured cable wires is estimated from the limited number of actual fractures observed; the Type I Distribution is used to estimate the true number of brittle wires. The most conservative current safety factors against failure range from 2.0 for the Triborough Bridge to 3.0 for the Williamsburg Bridge. Additional wire sampling and testing should be performed on the Triborough Bridge's cables.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. (1970). Probability, statistics, and decision making for civil engineers. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
2.
Jakkula, A. A. (1941). “A history of suspension bridges in bibliographical form.”Bull. of the Agric. and Mech. Coll. of Texas, 12.
3.
Matteo, J. A., and Deodatis, G. and Billington(1994). “Safety analysis of suspension bridge cables: the Williamsburg Bridge.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 112(11), 3197–3211.
4.
Steinman Boynton Gronquist & Birdsall. (1988).“Williamsburg Bridge Cable Investigation Program.”Final Rep., New York State Dept. of Transp., Albany, N.Y.
5.
Steinman Boynton Gronquist & Birdsall. (1990). “Golden Gate Bridge: Condition Inspection of Major Structural Components.” Golden Gate Bridge Authority, San Francisco, Calif.
6.
Steinman Boynton Gronquist & Birdsall (1991a). “Bear Mountain Bridge Main Cable Investigation, Part I.” New York State Bridge Authority, Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
7.
Steinman Boynton Gronquist & Birdsall (1991b). “Bear Mountain Bridge Main Cable Investigation, Part II.” New York State Bridge Authority, Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
8.
Steinman Boynton Gronquist & Birdsall. (1991c). “Triborough Bridge In-Depth Cable Inspection: Report on Inspection, Evaluation and Recommendations for Rehabilitation.” Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, New York, N.Y.
9.
Steinman Boynton Gronquist & Birdsall. (1995). “Bear Mountain Bridge: Inspection and Testing of Main Cables.” New York State Bridge Authority, Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
10.
Steinman, D. B. (1929). A practical treatise on suspension bridges. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
11.
U.S. Department of Transportation (1994). “National Bridge Inventory for Suspension Bridges.” U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 2 • Issue 4 • November 1997
Pages: 157 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1997
Published in print: Nov 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.