Modeling Water Table Mounding to Design Cluster and High-Density Wastewater Soil Absorption Systems
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 13, Issue 8
Abstract
Water table mounding warrants consideration in the design of cluster and high-density wastewater soil absorption systems (WSAS). Use of iterative analytical solutions with the design approach presented here provides a useful initial assessment of the potential for mounding beneath a WSAS, but cannot account for anisotropy, heterogeneity, regional flow, and local hydraulic boundaries. The relative influence of these factors may not be intuitive, but can be evaluated with site-specific numerical models in cases where the failure of these systems may have severe consequences. There is a greater difference of calculated mound height for isotropic analytical solutions and anisotropic numerical solutions in low hydraulic conductivity materials and thicker aquifers. In all cases, increased vertical anisotropy increases mounding, but not nearly as much as would be calculated by using the vertical hydraulic conductivity value for hydraulic conductivity in the analytical solution. Increased gradient has less influence on mound height in thicker aquifers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Decentralized Water Resources Capacity Development Project (NDWRCDP) with funding provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
References
Finnemore, E. J., and Hantzsche, N. N. (1983). “Groundwater mounding due to on-site sewage disposal.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 109(2), 199–210.
Freeze, R. A., and Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, New York.
Hantush, M. S. (1967). “Growth and decay of groundwater mounds in response to uniform percolation.” Water Resour. Res., 3(1), 227–234.
Harbaugh, A. W., Banta, E. R., Hill, M. C., and McDonald, M. G. (2000). “MODFLOW-2000: The U.S. Geological Survey modular groundwater model—User guide to modularization concepts and the groundwater flow process.” Open-File Rep. No. 00-92, U.S. Geological Survey, ⟨http://water.usgs.gov/software/ground_water.html⟩.
McCray, J. E., Kirkland, S. L., Siegrist, R. L., and Thyne, G. D. (2005). “Transport-model input parameters for onsite-wastewater nutrients.” Ground Water, 43(4), 628–639.
McCray, J. E., Nieber, J., and Poeter, E. P. (2008). “Ground-water mounding in the Vadose zone from onsite wastewater systems: Analytical and numerical tools.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 13(8), 710–719.
Poeter, E. P. (2007). “Spread sheet for analytical solution.” ⟨http://www.mines.edu/~epoeter/mounding⟩.
Poeter, E. P., McCray, J. E., Thyne, G. D., and Siegrist, R. L. (2005). “Designing cluster and high density waste-water soil absorption systems to control groundwater mounding.” Small Flows Quarterly, 7(4), 36–48.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 7, 2006
Accepted: Feb 27, 2007
Published online: Aug 1, 2008
Published in print: Aug 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.