TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 1, 2007

Log-Pearson Type 3 Distribution and Its Application in Flood Frequency Analysis. II: Parameter Estimation Methods

This article is a reply.
VIEW THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 12, Issue 5

Abstract

A number of parameter estimation methods for the log-Pearson type 3 distribution have been explored in the hydrologic literature, including the method of moments (MOM) in both log space and real space, maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs), and the method of mixed moments (MXM). Several studies have compared MLE and MXM estimators to a so-called Bulletin 17B MOM estimator, but only marginal gains in accuracy are reported and the conclusions are often conflicting. This paper resolves these discrepancies. The observed performance of MLEs can depend critically on the convergence criteria and parameter constraints. Reasonable constraints on parameters can also improve the performance of log space MOM estimators. The method of mixed moments does very well in comparison to MOM and MLE in the absence of regional information. However, a Monte Carlo analysis demonstrates that log space MOM estimators with regional skew information as recommended by Bulletin 17B are likely to be more attractive, and the more precise the regional skewness information the more precise are these flood quantile estimators. MLEs employing regional skew information are also investigated.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers greatly acknowledge support provided by a Water Resources Institute Internship Award No. 02HQGR0128 by the U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior. Encouragement and comments provided by Timothy Cohn are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Arora, K., and Singh, V. P. (1989). “A comparative evaluation of the estimators of the log Pearson type 3 distribution.” J. Hydrol., 105(1), 19–37.
Bain, L. J. (1978). Statistical analysis of reliability and life-testing models, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Beard, L. R. (1962). “Statistical methods in hydrology.” Civil works investigation project CW-151, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento, Calif.
Benson, M. A. (1968). “Uniform flood-frequency estimating methods for federal agencies.” Water Resour. Res., 4(5), 891–908.
Bobee, B. (1975). “The log Pearson type III distribution and its application in hydrology.” Water Resour. Res., 11(5), 681–689.
Bobee, B., and Ashkar, F. (1988). “Generalized method-of-moments applied to LP3 distribution.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 114(8), 899–909.
Bobee, B., and Ashkar, F. (1991). The gamma family and derived distributions applied in hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo.
Bobee, B. B., and Robitaille, R. (1977). “The use of the Pearson type 3 and log-Pearson type 3 distribution revisited.” Water Resour. Res., 13(2), 427–433.
Chowdury, J. U., and Stedinger, J. R. (1991). “Confidence interval for design floods with estimated skew coefficient.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 117(7), 811–831.
Cohn, T. A., Lane, W. L., and Baier, W. G. (1997). “An algorithm for computing moments-based flood quantile estimates when historical flood information is available.” Water Resour. Res., 33(9), 2089–2096.
Condie, R. (1977). “The log-Pearson type 3 distribution: The T-year event and its asymptotic standard error by maximum likelihood theory.” Water Resour. Res., 13(6), 987–991.
Durrans, S. R. (1992). “Parameter estimation for the Pearson type 3 distribution using order statistics.” J. Hydrol., 133(1), 215–232.
Durrans, S. R. (1994). “Parameter estimation for the Pearson type 3 distribution using order statistics—Reply.” J. Hydrol., 153(1), 425–431.
Fill, H. D. (1994). “Improving flood quantile estimates using regional information.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.
Fisher, R. A. (1922). “On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 222, 309–368.
Griffis, V. W. (2003). “Evaluation of log-Pearson type 3 flood frequency analysis methods addressing regional skew and low outliers.” MS thesis, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y.
Griffis, V. W., and Stedinger, J. R. (2007). “The log-Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in flood frequency analysis: 1. Distribution characteristics.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 12(5), 482–491.
Griffis, V. W., Stedinger, J. R., and Cohn, T. A. (2004). “LP3 quantile estimators with regional skew information and low outlier adjustments.” Water Resour. Res., 40(7), W07503.
Hardison, C. H. (1974). “Generalized skew coefficients of annual floods in the United States and their application.” Water Resour. Res., 10(4), 745–751.
Hirose, H. (1995). “Maximum likelihood parameter estimation in the three-parameter gamma distribution.” Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 20, 343–354.
Hoshi, K., and Burges, S. J. (1981). “Sampling properties of parameter estimates for the log Pearson type 3 distribution using moments in real space.” J. Hydrol., 53(1), 305–316.
Hoshi, K., and Yamaoka, I. (1980). “Parameter estimates of the log-Pearson type 3 distribution using moments in real space.” Hydraulics papers, No. 6, The Research Laboratory of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hokkaido Univ., Sapporo, Japan, 134.
Hosking, J. R. M., and Wallis, J. R. (1988). “The effect of intersite dependence on regional flood frequency analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 29, 271–281.
Hosking, J. R. M., and Wallis, J. R. (1997). Regional frequency analysis: An approach based on L-moments, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Interagency Committee on Water Data (IACWD). (1982). “Guidelines for determining flood flow frequency.” Bulletin 17B (revised and corrected), Hydrol. Subcomm., Washington, D.C.
Jennings, M. E., and Benson, M. A. (1969). “Frequency curves for annual flood series with some zero events or incomplete data.” Water Resour. Res., 5(1), 276–280.
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., and Balakrishnan, N. (1994). Continuous univariate distributions, Vol. 1, 2nd. Ed., Wiley, New York.
Kirby, W. (1972). “Computer-oriented Wilson–Hilferty transformation that preserves the first three moments and the lower bound of the Pearson type 3 distribution.” Water Resour. Res., 8(5), 125l–l254.
Koutrouvelis, I. A., and Canavos, G. C. (1999). “Estimation in the Pearson type 3 distribution.” Water Resour. Res., 35(9), 2693–2704.
Landwehr, J. M., Matalas, N. C., and Wallis, J. R. (1978). “Some comparisons of flood statistics in real and log space.” Water Resour. Res., 14(5), 902–920.
Landwehr, J. M., Matalas, N. C., and Wallis, J. R. (1979). “Probability weighted moments compared with some traditional techniques in estimating Gumbel parameters and quantiles.” Water Resour. Res., 15(5), 1055–1064.
Lettenmaier, D. P., and Potter, K. W. (1985). “Testing flood frequency estimation methods using a regional flood generation model.” Water Resour. Res., 21(12), 1903–1914.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Wallis, J. R., and Wood, E. F. (1987). “Effect of regional heterogeneity on flood frequency estimation.” Water Resour. Res., 23(2), 313–323.
Martins, E. S., and Stedinger, J. R. (2000). “Generalized maximum likelihood GEV quantile estimators for hydrologic data.” Water Resour. Res., 36(3), 737–744.
Martins, E. S. P. R., and Stedinger, J. R. (2002). “Efficient regional estimates of LP3 skew using GLS regression.” Proc., Environmental and Water Res. Institute, Roanoke, Va.
Matalas, N. C., and Wallis, J. R. (1973). “Eureka! It fits a Pearson type 3 distribution.” Water Resour. Res., 9(2), 281–289.
Nozdryn-Plotnicki, M. J., and Watt, W. E. (1979). “Assessment of fitting techniques for the log-Pearson type 3 distribution using Monte Carlo simulation.” Water Resour. Res., 15(3), 714–718.
Phien, H. N., and Hira, M. A. (1983). “Log-Pearson type 3 distribution: Parameter estimation.” J. Hydrol., 64(3), 25–37.
Pope, B. F., Tasker, G. D., and Robbins, J. C. (2001). “Estimating the magnitude and frequency of floods in rural basins of North Carolina—Revised.” Water-Resources Investigations Rep. 01-4207, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
Potter, K. W., and Lettenmaier, D. P. (1990). “A comparison of regional flood frequency estimation methods using a resampling method.” Water Resour. Res., 26(3), 415–424.
Rao, D. V. (1980a). “Log-Pearson type 3 distribution: A generalized evaluation.” J. Hydr. Div. 106(5), 853–872.
Rao, D. V. (1980b). “Log-Pearson type 3 distribution: Method of mixed moments.” J. Hydr. Div. 106(6), 999–1019.
Rao, D. V. (1983). “Estimating log Pearson parameters by mixed moments.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 109(8), 1118–1132.
Rao, D. V. (1986). “Fitting log-Pearson type 3 distribution by maximum likelihood.” Hydrologic frequency modeling, V. H. Singh, ed., D. Reidel, Norwell, Mass., 395–406.
Rasmussen, P. F., Bobee, B., and Bernier, J. (1994). “Parameter estimation for the Pearson type 3 distribution using order statistics—Comment.” J. Hydrol., 153(1), 417–424.
Rasmussen, P. P., and Perry, C. A. (2000). “Estimation of peak streamflows for unregulated rural streams in Kansas.” Water-Resources Investigation Rep. 00-4079, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
Reis, D. S., Jr., Stedinger, J. R., and Martins, E. S. (2003). “Bayesian GLS regression with application to LP3 regional skew estimation.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2003, P. Bizier and P. DeBarry, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va.
Reis, D. S., Jr., Stedinger, J. R., and Martins, E. S. (2004). “Operational Bayesian GLS regression for regional hydrologic analyses.” Proc., Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management, World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, G. Sehlke, D. F. Hayes, and D. K. Stevens, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va.
Reis, D. S., Jr., Stedinger, J. R., and Martins, E. S. (2005). “Bayesian generalized least squares regression with application to log Pearson type 3 regional skew estimation.” Water Resour. Res., 41(10), W10419.
Stedinger, J. R. (1980). “Fitting log normal distributions to hydrologic data.” Water Resour. Res., 16(3), 481–490.
Stedinger, J. R., and Lu, L. (1995). “Appraisal of regional and index flood quantile estimators.” Stochastic Hydrol. Hydraul. 9(1), 49–75.
Tasker, G. D., and Stedinger, J. R. (1986). “Estimating generalized skew with weighted least squares regression.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 112(2), 225–237.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 12Issue 5September 2007
Pages: 492 - 500

History

Received: Sep 13, 2005
Accepted: Nov 30, 2006
Published online: Sep 1, 2007
Published in print: Sep 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

V. W. Griffis, M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological Univ., 1400 Townsend Dr., Houghton, MI 49931-1295. E-mail: [email protected]
J. R. Stedinger, M.ASCE
Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell Univ., Hollister Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3501. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share