Sensitivity of a Distributed Watershed Simulation Model to Spatial Scale
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 12, Issue 2
Abstract
The results of distributed watershed models could be sensitive to spatial and temporal scales at which inputs and model parameters are aggregated. This paper reports findings of a detailed sensitivity analysis conducted on the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s distributed watershed simulation model, known as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The Big Creek Watershed, located in southern Illinois, is used for the study. The model is calibrated to improve accuracy of its streamflow and sediment concentration predictions using observed data at two locations in the study watershed. Streamflow and sediment concentrations that are simulated by the calibrated model at various spatial scales of discritization are extracted and compared, and inputs and model parameters responsible for sensitivity of model responses are identified. Several indices that could be used as indicators of model behavior are also derived. In addition, feasibility analysis of SWAT is conducted to see if the watershed simulation model could be used as a component in future decision support models developed to assist in identifying integrative watershed management practices that control agricultural nonpoint source pollutions from watersheds. The major findings of the study are: (1) accuracy of the raw model output (streamflow and sediment yield) is very poor for all delineations indicating the need for careful model calibration; (2) streamflow is relatively insensitive to spatial scale; and (3) sediment generated and sediment that leaves the watershed decreases as spatial scale gets coarser. Unlike the findings of previous studies, sediment yield significantly varies, even when properties of the outlet channel remain practically the same. (4) SWAT’s estimate of sediment yield is sensitive to human activities conducted in subbasins of the watershed, thus indicating the capability of SWAT to evaluate consequences of alternative watershed management practices.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the Illinois Council for Food and Agricultural Research and the National Science Foundation (Grant No. NSFBCS-041087).
References
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (1999). GIS modules and distributed models of the watershed, Reston, Va.
Arnold, J. G., and Allen, P. M. (1996). “Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds.” J. Hydrol., 176(1–4), 55–77.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 73–89.
Bagnold, R. A. (1977). “Bed load transport in natural rivers.” Water Resour. Res., 13(2), 303–312.
Barrett, E. C. (2001). “Satellite remote sensing of precipitation: Progress and problems.” Remote sensing and hydrology 2000, M. Owe, K. Brubaker, J. Ritchie, and A. Rango, eds., International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS), Wallingford, U.K., Publication No. 267.
Bingner, R. L., Garbrecht, J., Arnold, J. G., and Srinivasan, R. (1997). “Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation runoff and fine sediment yield.” Trans. ASAE, 40(5), 1329–1335.
Demissie, M., Knapp, V. H., Parmer, P., and Kriesant, D. J. (2001). “Hydrology of the Big Creek watershed and its influence on the Lower Cache River.” Contract Rep. No.2001-06, Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Ill.
FitzHugh, T. W., and Mackay, D. S. (2000). “Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation an agricultural non point source pollution model.” J. Hydrol., 236(1–2), 35–53.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). (1998). The pilot watershed program: Watershed management, monitoring, and assessment, Springfield, Ill.
Klemes, V. (1983). “Conceptualization and scale in hydrology.” J. Hydrol., 65(1–3), 1–23.
Mamillapalli, S., Srinivasan, R., Arnold, J. G., and Engel, B. A. (1996). “Effect of spatial variability on basin scale modeling.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf./Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Fe, N.M.
Muleta, M. K. (2003). “A decision support system for the management of non-point source pollution from watersheds.” Ph.D. thesis, College of Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ. Carbondale, Carbondale, Ill.
Muleta, M. K., and Nicklow, J. W. (2005). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model.” J. Hydrol., 306(1–4), 127–145.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., and Williams, J. R. (2001). Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2000, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Service, Temple, Tex.
Sposito, G., ed. (1998). Scale dependence and scale independence in hydrology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Trimble, S. W. (1981). “Changes in sediment storage in the Coon Creek Basin, driftless areas, Wisconsin, 1853 to 1975.” Science, 214(4517), 181–183.
Williams, J. R. (1975). “Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds.” Water Resour. Bull., 11(5), 965–974.
Wood, E. F. (1998). “Scale analysis for land-surface hydrology,” Scale dependence and scale independence in hydrology, G. Sposito, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Wood, E. F., Sivapalan, M., Beven, K., and Band, L. (1988). “Effects of spatial variability and scale with implication to hydrologic modeling.” J. Hydrol., 102, 29–47.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 23, 2005
Accepted: Jun 6, 2006
Published online: Mar 1, 2007
Published in print: Mar 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.