Using GIS to Determine Extent of Gauged Streams in a Region
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 2
Abstract
A geographic information system (GIS) based approach to quantify the coverage provided by a stream gauge network is presented. This approach relies on digital elevation models, a digital representation of the observed stream network, and the locations of all stream gauge locations in the area of interest. A case study examining the coverage provided by the U.S. Geological Survey gauge network in the state of Maryland is presented. The reported coverages corresponding to an observed stream network at 1:100,000 map scale are 8.1% for all gauges in the region and 4.7% considering only active gauges. The apparently low coverage afforded by the gauge network is explained against the observation that the areal coverage of the gauge watersheds is far greater than the reported gauged stream extent. This work highlights the frequent misconception that the gauged property of streams pertains to all streams within the gauge watershed. In reality, this property is a one-dimensional characteristic pertaining only to the stream in the vicinity of the gauge. Issues of map scale and decision making regarding the addition or removal of stream gauges are also addressed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Basins Data Download http://www.epa.gov/OST/BASINS/gisdata.html. (1999). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
2.
Carpenter, D. H. (1980). “Technique for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods in Maryland.” USGS Water-Resour. Investigations Open-File Rep. 80-1016, U.S. Geological Survey, Baltimore, Md.
3.
Carpenter, T. M., and Georgakakos, K. P. (1993). “GIS-based procedures in support of flash flood guidance.” IIHR Rep. No. 366, Iowa Institute of Hydraulic Research, Iowa City, Iowa.
4.
Dewald, T. G., and Olsen, M. V. (1994). “The EPA reach file: A national spatial data resource.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C., 〈http://www.epa.gov/owowwtr1/monitoring/rf/rfnsdr.html〉
5.
Dillow, J. J. A. (1996). “Technique for estimating magnitude and frequency of peak flows in Maryland.” USGS Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. 95-4154, U.S. Geological Survey, Baltimore, Md.
6.
Hannum, C. H. (1976). “Technique for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods in Kentucky.” USGS Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. 76-62, U.S. Geological Survey, Louisville, Ky.
7.
Hayes, D. C. ( 1991). “Low-flow characteristics of streams in Virginia.” USGS Water-Supply Paper 2374, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo.
8.
James, R. W., Helinksy, B. M., and Tallman, A. J. (1998). “Water resources data—Maryland and Delaware water year 1997. Volume 1: Surface water.” USGS Water-Data Rep. MD-DE-97-1, U.S. Geological Survey, Baltimore, Md.
9.
Jennings, M. E., Thomas, W. O. Jr., and Riggs, H. C. (1994). “Nationwide summary of U.S. Geological Survey regional regression equations for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods for ungaged sites, 1993.” USGS Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. 94-4002, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo.
10.
Jenson, S. K., and Domingue, J. O. (1988). “Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis.” Photogrammetric Engrg. and Remote Sensing, 54(11), 1593–1600.
11.
Jordan, P. R. (1984). “Magnitude and frequency of high flows of unregulated streams in Kansas.” USGS Water-Resour. Investigations Open-File Rep. 84-453, U.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kans.
12.
McCuen, R. H., and Levy, B. S. (1999). “An evaluation of peak discharge transposition.”J. Hydrologic Engrg., ASCE, in press.
13.
Sauer, V. B. (1973). “Flood characteristics of Oklahoma streams; Techniques for calculating magnitude and frequency of floods in Oklahoma with compilations of flood data through 1971.” USGS Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. 73-52, U.S. Geological Survey, Oklahoma City, Okla.
14.
Stem, J. E. ( 1990). “State plane coordinate system of 1983.” NOAA manual NOS NGS 5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Rockville, Md.
15.
Tarboton, D. G., Bras, R. L., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1991). “On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data.” Hydrological Processes, 5, 81–100.
16.
Thomas, W. O. Jr. ( 1987). “Techniques used by the U.S. Geological Sur-vey in estimating the magnitude and frequency of floods.” Catastrophic flooding, L. Mayer and D. Nash, eds., Allen and Unwin, Boston, Mass., 267–288.
17.
U.S. GeoData http://edcwww.cr.usgs.gov/doc/edchome/ndcdb/ndcdb.html. (1999). U.S. Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, S.D.
18.
U.S. NWIS-W Data Retrieval http://h2o-nwisw.er.usgs.gov/nwis-w/US/. (1999). U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
19.
Wandle, S. W. ( 1983). “Estimating peak discharge of small, rural streams in Massachusetts.” USGS Water-Supply Paper 2214, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 5 • Issue 2 • April 2000
Pages: 190 - 196
History
Received: Mar 15, 1999
Published online: Apr 1, 2000
Published in print: Apr 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.