TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 1999

Modeling Hydrologic and Water Quality Responses to Grass Waterways

Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 3

Abstract

The impact of vegetation filter strips on runoff, sediment yield, and atrazine loss from a cultivated field was investigated using a physically based, distributed watershed model. The field to which the model is applied has a gentle to flat sloping surface covered by a thin topsoil layer underlain by a claypan and is located in the Goodwater Creek watershed, a USDA research site in central Missouri. The model, which works on a cell basis, was developed to route runoff, sediment, and soluble chemical downslope from one cell to the next. The spatial variability of soil, depth of the topsoil, and vegetation are allowed among cells; each cell, however, is represented as a homogeneous unit. Our investigation indicates that changing waterway cover from natural sparse vegetation to dense grass has great potential for retarding runoff and reducing sediment loss, but it is not effective for controlling atrazine loss on claypan soils.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Alberts, E. E., Hjelmfelt, Jr., A. T., Donald, W. W., and Kitchen, N. R. (1995). “Herbicide transport in surface runoff from watersheds.” Proc., 5th Annu. Water Quality Conf., Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Missouri, 4–10.
2.
Dillaha, T. A., Sherrard, J. H., Lee, D., Mostaghimi, S., and Shanholtz, V. O. (1988). “Evaluation of vegetative filter strips as a best management practice for feed lots.” J. Water Pollution Control Fedn., 60(7), 1231–1238.
3.
Dillaha, T. A., Reneau, R. B., Mostaghimi, S., and Lee, D. (1989). “Vegetative filter strips for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control.” Trans. ASAE, 32(2), 513–519.
4.
cElliot, W. J., and Ward, A. D. ( 1995). “Soil erosion and control practices.” Environmental hydrology, A. D. Ward and W. J. Elliot, eds., Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fla., 177–203.
5.
cFoster, G. R. ( 1982). “Modeling the erosion process.” Hydrologic modeling of small watershed, C. T. Hann, H. P. Johnson, D. L. Brakensiek, eds., American Society of Agriculture Engineers, St. Joseph, Mich., 297–305.
6.
cFoster, G. R., and Meyer, L. D. ( 1975). “Mathematical simulation of upland erosion by fundamental erosion mechanics.” Present and prospective technology for predicting sediment yields and sources, ARS-S-40, USDA—Agricultural Research Service, Oxford, Miss., 190–207.
7.
Hjelmfelt, A. T., Jr. (1986). “Estimating peak runoff from field-size watersheds.” Water Resour. Bull., 22(2), 267–273.
8.
Magette, W. L., Brinsfield, R. B., Palmer, R. E., and Wood, J. D. (1989). “Nutrient and sediment removal by vegetated filter strips.” Trans. ASAE, 32(2), 663–667.
9.
Munoz-Carpena, R., Parsons, J. E., and Gilliam, J. W. (1993). “Numerical approach to the overland flow process in vegetative filter strips.” Trans. ASAE, 36(3), 761–770.
10.
Tim, U. S., and Jolly, R. (1994). “Evaluating agricultural nonpoint-source pollution using integrated geographic information systems and hydrologic/water quality model.” J. Envir. Quality, 23, 25–35.
11.
Wang, M. ( 1995). “A dynamic hydrologic and non-point pollutant transport model based on DEMs, ” PhD thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo.
12.
Wang, M., and Hjelmfelt, A. T. (1998). “DEM based overland flow routing model.”J. Hydrologic Engrg., ASCE, 3(1), 1–8.
13.
Wischmeier, W. H., and Smith, D. D. (1978). “Predicting rainfall erosion losses—A guide to conservation planning.” Agriculture handbook 537, USDA-Science and Education Administration, Washington, D.C.
14.
Young, R. A., Onstad, C. A., Bosch, D. D., and Anderson, W. P. (1987). “AGNPS, agricultural non-point-sources pollution model, a watershed analysis tool.” USDA-Agric. Res. Service Conservation Research Rep. 35, USDA—Agriculture Research Service., Morris, Minn.
15.
Young, R. A., Huntrods, T., and Anderson, W. (1980). “Effectiveness of vegetative buffer strips in controlling pollution from feedlot runoff.” J. Envir. Quality, 9, 483–487.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 4Issue 3July 1999
Pages: 251 - 256

History

Received: Aug 26, 1997
Published online: Jul 1, 1999
Published in print: Jul 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Res. Hydr. Engr., USDA—Agric. Res. Service, Cropping Sys. and Water Quality Res. Unit, Columbia, MO 65211.
Res. Assoc., Food Sci. and Engrg. Unit, Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share