Detection of Outliers in Pearson Type III Data
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 1
Abstract
The Bulletin 17B guidelines for flood frequency analysis provide a method for detecting outliers that is constrained in three ways: (1) It assumes zero skew; (2) it does not address multiple outliers; and (3) it only provides for a 10% level of significance. Because these guidelines also specify a log-Pearson Type III distribution and skews different from zero are common, critical deviates for detecting outliers in samples with skews from −1 to 1 are needed. Using Monte Carlo simulation with Pearson Type III distributions, critical deviates for detecting outliers were computed. The analyses provide functions that describe the relation between the critical deviate and sample sizes from 10 to 150. Critical deviates were developed for detecting up to three outliers from Pearson Type III samples with skews from −1 to 1 and for three levels of significance (10%, 5%, and 1%). The critical deviates are expected to be within 1% of the true values. Flood records from 50 USGS stream gauges were analyzed to assess the effect of using these skew-dependent critical deviates. Comparison of the skew-dependent test to the Bulletin 17B zero-skew test revealed that the zero-skew criterion led to incorrect decisions in 30% of the cases. The importance of the level of significance was also investigated using the 50 flood records. At the 5% level, only one low and three high outliers were detected, whereas at the 10% level, six low and five high outliers were detected.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barnett, V., and Lewis, T. (1978). Outliers in statistical data . John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
2.
Beckman, R. J., and Cook, R. D.(1983). “Outlier . . . . . . . . . . s.”Technometrics, 25(2), 119–149.
3.
Dixon, W. J.(1950). “Analysis of extreme values.”Ann. of Math. Statistics, 21, 488–506.
4.
Grubbs, F. E.(1950). “Sample criteria for testing outlying observations.”Ann. of Math. Statistics, 21(1), 27–58.
5.
Grubbs, F. E.(1969). “Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples.”Technometrics, 11(1), 1–10.
6.
Grubbs, F. E., and Beck, G.(1972). “Extension of sample sizes and percentage points for significance tests of outlying observations.”Technometrics, 4(14), 847–853.
7.
Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, Hydrology Subcommittee. (1982). Guidelines for Determining Flood Flow Frequency (Bull. 17B), U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
8.
Kirby, W. H., Lumb, A. M., Flynn, K. M., and Thomas, W. O. Jr. (1994). Draft users manual for program PEAKFQ, annual flood frequency analysis using Bulletin 17B guidelines . U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
9.
McCuen, R. H. (1993). Microcomputer applications in statistical hydrology . Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
10.
McMillan, R. G.(1971). “Tests for one or two outliers in normal samples with unknown variance.”Technometrics, 13(1), 87–100.
11.
Rosner, B.(1975). “On the detection of many outliers.”Technometrics, 17(2), 221–227.
12.
Rosner, B.(1983). “Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure.”Technometrics, 25(2), 165–172.
13.
Thomas, W. O. Jr.(1985). “A uniform technique for flood frequency analysis.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 111(3), 321–330.
14.
Tietjen, G. L., and Moore, R. H.(1972). “Some Grubbs-type statistics for the detection of several outliers.”Technometrics, 14(3), 583–597.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1996
Published in print: Jan 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.