Uncertainty in Structural Engineering
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 13, Issue 1
Abstract
Structural engineering design is replete with uncertainties, some of which are obvious and some of which many engineers may never have considered. This paper is an examination of the uncertainties facing structural engineers and the ways that engineers have developed to handle those uncertainties. Uncertainty can be separated into two categories: Aleatory, related to luck or chance, and epistemic, related to knowledge. This breakdown has an impact on how we handle the various types of uncertainty. Uncertainty has a range of sources; we consider five broad sources: time, statistical limits, model limits, randomness, and human error. These five sources will be examined using examples from structural engineering, particularly with respect to the allowable stress design and LRFD code formats. Some uncertainties are explicitly dealt with in design codes, some are dealt with through quality control measures, and some are dealt with in implicit ways that we often do not think much about, e.g., heuristics. Design codes can deal with uncertainties caused by randomness, statistical limits, some aspects of time, and modeling. Other uncertainties such as human error must be dealt with using quality control methods, such as peer reviews and construction inspection.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1956). “Building code requirements for reinforced concrete.” ACI 318, Detroit.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1963). “Building code requirements for reinforced concrete.” ACI 318, Detroit.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1971). “Building code requirements for reinforced concrete.” ACI 318, Detroit.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1999). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” ACI 318, Farmington Hills, Mich.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2002). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” ACI 318, Farmington Hills, Mich.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2005). “Building code requirements for structural concrete.” ACI 318, Farmington Hills, Mich.
American Forest and Paper Association (AF & PA). (2005). ASD/LRFD national design specification (NDS) for wood construction, Washington, D.C.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1986). Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings, Chicago.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2005). Specification for structural steel buildings, Chicago.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (1995). Standard for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for engineered wood construction, ASCE, New York.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, Reston, Va.
Ayyub, B. M., and McCuen, R. H. (2003). Probability, statistics, and reliability for engineers and scientists, 2nd Ed., Chapman Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Part 2: Commentary, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.
Bulleit, W. M. (1985). “Relative reliability of dimension lumber in bending.” J. Struct. Eng., 111(9), 1948–1963.
Chen, S. S., Aref, A. J., Chiewanichakorn, M., and Ahn, I.-S. (2007). “Proposed effective width criteria for composite bridge girders.” J. Bridge Eng., 12(3), 325–338.
Ellingwood, B. R., Galambos, T. V., MacGregor, J. G., and Cornell, C. A. (1980). Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Md.
Ellingwood, B. R., and Redfield, R. (1983). “Ground snow loads for structural design.” J. Struct. Eng., 109(4), 950–964.
Elms, D. (1985). “The principle of consistent crudeness.” Proc., NSF Workshop on Civil Engineering Applications of Fuzzy Sets, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind., 35–44.
Koen, B. V. (2003). Discussion of the method, Oxford University Press, New York.
Morgenstern, J. (1995). “The fifty-nine story crisis.” The New Yorker, May 29, 45–53.
National Forest Products Association (NFPA). (1991). National design specification (NDS) for wood construction, Washington, D.C.
Petrosky, H. (1982). To engineer is human, St. Martin’s Press, New York.
Petrosky, H. (1994). Design paradigms: Case histories of error and judgment in engineering, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial, 3rd Ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Turkstra, C. J., and Madsen, H. O. (1980). “Load combinations in codified structural design.” J. Struct. Div., 106(12), 2527–2543.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 13 • Issue 1 • February 2008
Pages: 24 - 30
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 21, 2007
Accepted: Jul 13, 2007
Published online: Feb 1, 2008
Published in print: Feb 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.