Understanding Capacity Rating of Bridges from Load Tests
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 8, Issue 4
Abstract
The paper discusses a few issues related to capacity rating of existing bridges using field test results. The principles of proof and diagnostic load tests for capacity evaluation are presented through discussing the rating formulas for both tests. The proof load rating is proven a lower bound method. The diagnostic rating is proven the same as linear extrapolation, meaning an upper bound approach in nature. Two different methods used in the literature in calculating load distribution factors are discussed. The two methods are proven theoretically equal in an ideal case, but could be significantly different for field bridges due to the effects of many field factors. To distinguish the two methods, one is defined as load distribution factor (LDF) and the other as girder distribution factor (GDF). An example is used to demonstrate the discussions. The results indicate that, on one hand, the measured LDF, though calculated from measured strains, cannot fully reflect the capacity conditions of field bridges. It reflects only a relative load distribution among girders. On the other hand, the GDF approach may overestimate the bridge capacity, because it includes all the beneficial effects. Some beneficial effects may not be reliable for ultimate capacity and thus need to be removed from the capacity rating.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1994). Manual for condition evaluation of bridges, Washington D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1996). Standard specification for highway bridges, Washington, D.C.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1998). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, D.C.
Arockiasamy, M., Amer, A., and Bell, N. (1997). “Load distribution on highway bridges based on field test data: phase II.” Rep. Prepared for Florida Department of Transportation, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Fla.
Bakht, B., and Jaeger, L. G.(1988). “Bearing restraint in slab-on-girder bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 114(12), 2724–2740.
Bakht, B., and Jaeger, L. G.(1990). “Bridge testing—a surprise every time.” J. Struct. Eng., 116(5), 1370–1383.
Bakht, B., and Jaeger, L. G.(1992). “Ultimate load test of slab-on-girder bridge.” J. Struct. Eng., 118(6), 1608–1624.
Barker, M. G.(2001). “Quantifying field-test behavior for rating steel girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 6(4), 254–261.
Cai, C. S., and Shahawy, M. (2002). “Predicted and measured performance of prestressed concrete bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., in press.
Cai, C. S., Shahawy, M., and El-Saad, A. (1998). “Non-destructive testing of field bridges in Florida.” Proc., Structural Materials Technology III, International Society of Optical Engineering, Bellingham, Wash., 19–30.
Stallings, J. M., and Yoo, C. H.(1993). “Tests and ratings of short-span steel bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 119(7), 2150–2168.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (1998). “Manual for bridge rating through load testing,” Research Results Digest No. 234, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 25, 2002
Accepted: Jun 4, 2002
Published online: Oct 15, 2003
Published in print: Nov 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.