Effects of Bridge Deck Thickness on Properties and Behavior of Bridge Decks
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 8, Issue 2
Abstract
About two years ago, the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) increased its minimum bridge deck thickness to 178 mm (7 in.), and thus ALDOT’s deck thicknesses now range from 178 to 197 mm (7–7.75 in.). Even with the upgrade, ALDOT still utilizes the thinnest decks in the country. Thicker bridge decks are stiffer, stronger, and should provide a longer service life; however, they cost more and require a stronger and more costly support girder system. All of the parameters investigated in the parameter sensitivity study, with the exception of two (deck unit weight and initial cost), support increasing Alabama’s minimum bridge deck thickness. An increase in thickness from 178 to 203 mm (7–8 in.) would cause the deck unit weight to increase 287–575 N/m2 (6–12 psf), depending on whether the concrete is added to the top or the underside of the deck. This would increase the cost of the bridge deck around $2.15/m2 ($1.80/yd2), and would translate into an increase in deck initial cost of around 2–3%. However, increasing the deck thickness from 178 to 203 mm (7–8 in.) would also increase the deck service life, which would reduce the life-cycle cost of the deck/bridge.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Barker, R. M., and Puckett, J. A. (1997). Design of highway bridges, Wiley, New York.
Graddy, J. C., Burns, N. H., and Klinger, R. E. (1995). “Factors affecting the design thickness of bridge slabs.” Center for Transportation Research Rep. 1305-3F, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
Hambly, E. C. (1991). Bridge deck behavior, 2nd Ed., E & FN Spon, London.
Itani, A. (1999). “Seismic analysis and design of modern steel highway bridges.” Proc., AISI Steel Bridge Forum, American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, D.C.
Portland Cement Association. (1995). “Durability of concrete bridge decks.” Final Rep. of Cooperative Study, Skokie, Ill.
Ramey, G. E., and Oliver, R. S. (1996). “Rapid rehabilitation/replacement of bridge decks.” Final Rep. Prepared for ALDOT on Research Project 930-376, Highway Research Center, Auburn Univ., Auburn, Ala.
Rogers, G. L. (1959). An introduction to the dynamics of framed structures, Wiley, New York.
Timoshenko, S. P., Young, D. H., and Weaver, W. (1974). Vibration problems in engineering, 4th Ed., Wiley, New York.
Tonias, D. E. (1995). Bridge engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 14, 2001
Accepted: Jan 28, 2002
Published online: Apr 15, 2003
Published in print: May 2003
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.