Modifying Existing Foundations to Carry Additional Load
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 5, Issue 3
Abstract
In many situations designers are faced with the problem of a building addition that requires new columns near, or directly above, existing foundations. Several design alternatives are usually considered, and frequently the desired objective is to minimize the impact on the existing foundations. The impact can be minimized by altering the substructure support system or by altering the design of the new building. Alternatives such as cantilevered grade beam systems supported by caissons, or the utilization of cantilevered beams in the superstructure, allow designers to setback the new column line from the existing foundations. The setback minimizes the effects on the existing foundations. The alternatives are usually explored fairly quickly and are precipitated by the desire to avoid a complicated and, perhaps, expensive analysis/design effort that may involve underpinning of the existing foundation. In some cases, alternatives are limited, and utilization of existing foundations, with appropriate modifications, is the only reasonable approach. Modifications of the existing footing to ensure that the allowable soil bearing capacity is not exceeded and that proper load transfer occurs between the existing foundation and additions thereto are critical to this approach. The analysis effort is heavily dependent on the utilization of current computer technology to quickly ascertain the load effects on existing foundations due to the new building columns. Engineering analysis software can be used to quickly determine the modifications that are required to accommodate the new column loads. During a recent design/analysis effort, current engineering analysis software was employed to ascertain the effects of new column loads on existing foundations. The analysis led to design modifications that allowed the new columns to be placed in close proximity to the existing building columns and placed directly onto existing foundations. The design/analysis process consisted of many important steps that ranged from establishing confidence in the computer model to final design modifications based on stress contour plots and basic strength of materials principles. A description of the analysis process and overall conclusions are presented herein.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1993). “Suggested analysis and design procedures for combined footings and mats.” ACI 336.2R-93, Part 4, Farmington Hills, Mich.
2.
Bowles, J. E. (1974). Analytical and computer methods in foundation engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York.
3.
Bowles, J. E. (1988). Foundation analysis and design, McGraw-Hill, New York.
4.
Fisher, J. M., Buettner, D. R., and Miller, C. B. (1980). Metal building systems, Metal Building Dealers Association, Ohio.
5.
Hetenyi, M. (1946). Beams on elastic foundation, theory with applications in the fields of civil and mechanical engineering, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich.
6.
Saunders, T. D., Cahill, J. A., Mclean, D. I., Marsh, M. L., and Ho, C. (1995). “Seismic retrofitting of bridge substructures.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1476, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 37–47.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Dec 7, 1999
Published online: Aug 1, 2000
Published in print: Aug 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.