Comparison of ASD and LRFD Codes for Wood Members. II: Flexural Loading
Publication: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
Volume 5, Issue 2
Abstract
As in the companion paper for axial loading, a comparison of the economies of the structural design of wood members subjected to flexural loading using the allowable stress design (ASD) and reliability-based [load and resistance factor design (LRFD) format] codes is presented. Analyses considered the combinations of dead load only, as well as dead plus live loads resulting from floor occupancy, snow, wind, and seismic activity. Ratios of live-to-dead loads ranged from zero to 10. Other factors that were found to have some influence on the efficiencies of beams susceptible to lateral torsional buckling were the ratio of modulus of elasticity to bending strength, unsupported beam length divided by beam depth, beam aspect ratio, and coefficient of variation of the beam modulus of elasticity. For laterally stable bending and flexural shear, the LRFD format provided the more efficient design for all loading combinations except snow and seismic loadings with live load-to-dead load ratios greater than three and four, respectively. For nominal 2 × 4 members, there was generally little difference between codes when the bending members were laterally unbraced. For the deeper sections, the ASD code proved to be more optimal. This was especially true when the variation in modulus of elasticity was low (i.e., for machine-stress-rated lumber).
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” (1993). ASCE 7-95 (revision of standard ANSI/ASCE 7-93, ASCE, New York.
2.
“National design specification for wood construction.” (1997). ANSI/AF&PA NDS-1997. American Forest & Paper Association, Washington, D.C.
3.
Pellicane, P. J., and Criswell, M. E. (2000). “Comparison of ASD and LRFD codes for wood members. I: Axial loading.”Pract. Periodical on Struct. Des. and Constr., ASCE, 5(2), 54–59.
4.
“Standard for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for engineered wood construction.” (1996). AF&PA/ASCE 16-95. American Forest & Paper Association/ASCE, Washington, D.C.
5.
“Standard specification for computing the reference resistance of wood-based materials and structural connections for load and resistance factor design.” (1994). ASTM D5457-93, ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Oct 28, 1998
Published online: May 1, 2000
Published in print: May 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.