Economic Comparison between Drywall and Conventional Partitions
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper describes two construction methods for erecting partitions in housing—concrete-block masonry (conventional partition) and drywall. The drawbacks of the conventional partitions are their erection is (1) labor-intensive; (2) time-consuming; (3) needs considerable preparatory work, and consequently is more expensive; and (4) is inflexible for changes during the life of the building. This paper briefly describes the methodology for field data gathering—time studies—used to get up-to-date data based on local conditions for the comparison between the two methods. The comparison showed that the direct costs of an apartment built with drywall partitions are at least 1% less than those built with conventional partitions. This difference can be even greater if other factors are considered. It is further shown that use of drywall can have the potential for saving 3–4% of the total workforce in the present-day Israeli construction market. As a result, encouragement of the use of drywall partitions is recommended.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Becker, R., and Koren, A. (1989). Performance comparison of various partitions . Nat. Build. Res. Inst., Technion, Haifa, Israel.
2.
Construction cost data. (1993). Dekel, Haifa, Israel.
3.
Flickinger, W. H. (1995). “Automated labor and equipment card (ALEC).”Proc., 2nd Congr. on Comp. in Civ. Engrg., Israel Build. Ctr., Tel Aviv, Israel, Vol. 2, 1360–1366.
4.
Hareli, M. (ed.) (1985). Construction inputs manual . Israel Build. Ctr., Tel Aviv, Israel.
5.
Liou, F. (1980). “MFMR: micro-computerized five minute rating.”Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Civ. and Struct. Engrg. Comp.–CIVIL-COMP 89, Israel Build. Ctr., Tel Aviv, Israel, 19–21.
6.
Navon, R.(1995). “Economic benefits of lightweight versus conventional construction methods.”J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 121(1), 27–36.
7.
Oglesby, C., Parker, H., and Howell, G. (1989). Productivity improvement in construction . McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
8.
Peer, S. (1965). Labor and equipment input in conventional construction . Build. Res. Station, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
9.
Peer, S. (1966). Mechanization of plastering: technological and economic analysis . Build. Res. Station, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
10.
Peer, S. (1975). The influence of changes in cost elements on the economy of construction methods . Build. Res. Station, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
11.
Perez, G., and Peer, S. (1975). The cost of using gypsum drywalls . Build. Res. Station, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
12.
Rol, Y. (ed.) (1978). Innovation in housing construction: analysis of the possibilities to improve interior finishing . Technion, Haifa, Israel.
13.
Safiach, A., and Dvori, R. (eds.) (1977). Standard-time catalogue . Inst. of Efficiency in Constr., Tel Aviv, Israel.
14.
Warszawski, A., and Carmel, D. (1980). Industrialization of finishing works . Build. Res. Station, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1996
Published in print: Dec 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.