TECHNICAL PAPERS
Feb 12, 2010

Determinants of Industry Acceptance for Highway Warranty Contracts: Alabama Case Study

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 16, Issue 1

Abstract

There is an increasing demand from state DOTs to explore alternative ways to provide adequate oversight on construction projects. As one of the innovative contracting techniques encouraged by the Federal Highway Administration, warranties in highway construction hold contractors accountable for potential maintenance for a given period of time after project completion. The warranty practices in many states indicate that such provisions would benefit the state DOTs by improving quality, reducing life-cycle costs and project duration, and encouraging contractor innovation. However, the successful implementation of warranty contracting needs widespread industry acceptance and collaboration. This paper presents the findings of a recent research on the industry acceptance of warranty contracting in the state of Alabama. The paper identifies several major concerns and the needs of the construction industry with respect to the subject matter. More importantly, the paper reports a learning process in using warranties in highway construction. Results shows that factors like leniency in specifications, tort liability, and contractors’ past experience on warranty jobs help achieve a significance level of industry acceptance. The findings presented in this paper would help those state highway agencies that have limited experience in integrating warranties effectively into their contracts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers thank the University Transportation Center for Alabama for providing financial support for this study. The writers are also in debt to Don Arkle, Ronald Baldwin, Walter Dowdy, Terry McDuffie, Terry Robinson, and Dr. Rocky Durrans for their valuable insights. The opinions and findings expressed here, however, are those of the writers alone. Finally, the writers acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions for the revision of this paper.

References

Anderson, S. D., and Russell, J. S. (2001). “Guidelines for warranty, multi-parameter, and best value contracting.” NCHRP Rep. No. 451, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Aschenbrener, T., and DeDios, R. (2001). “Material and workmanship warranties for hot bituminous pavement.” Rep. No. CDOTS-DTD-2001-18, Colorado DOT, Denver.
Bayraktar, M. E., Cui, Q., Hastak, M., and Minkarah, I. (2004). “The state-of-practice of warranty contracting in the US.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 10(2), 60–68.
Bayraktar, M. E., Cui, Q., Hastak, M., and Minkarah, I. (2006). “Warranty bonds from the perspective of surety companies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(4), 333–337.
Cui, Q., Bayraktar, M., Hastak, M., and Minkarah, I. (2004). “Use of warranties on highway projects: A real option perspective.” J. Manage. Eng., 20(3), 118–125.
Cui, Q., Johnson, P. W., and Sees, E. (2007). “Long-term warranty on highway projects.” USDOT-UTCA Rep. No. 06109, Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Ala.
Desu, M. M., and Raghavarao, D. (1990). Sample size methodology, Academic, San Diego.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2004). Performance specifications strategic road map: A vision for the future, FHWA, Washington, D.C.
Hancher, D. (1994). NCHRP synthesis 195: Use of warranties in road construction, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Hastak, M., Minkarah, I., Cui, Q., and Bayraktar, M. E. (2003). “The evaluation of warranty provisions on ODOT construction projects.” Rep. No. FHWA/OH-2003/019, Ohio DOT, Columbus, Ohio.
Krebs, S. W., et al. (2001). “Asphaltic pavement warranties, five-year progress report.” Rep. Prepared for Wisconsin DOT, Madison, Wis.
Russell, J. S., Hanna, A. S., Anderson, S. D., Wiseley, P. W., and Smith, R. J. (1999). “The warranty alternative.” Civ. Eng., 69, 60–63.
Singh, P., Oh, J. E., Labi, S., and Sinha, K. C. (2007). “Cost-effectiveness evaluation of warranty pavement projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 133(3), 217–224.
Stockburger, D. W. (1998). “Introductory statistics: Concepts, models, and applications.” 3rd Ed., Atomic Dog, Cincinnati.
Triola, M. F. (2005). Elementary statistics, 9th Ed., Pearson Education, New York.
Wang, L., and Park, J. (2004). “The effectiveness of pavement management databases to capture essential data to monitor the performance of projects under warranty.” Federal Highway Administration Rep., FHWA, Washington, D.C.
Weiss, N. A. (2005). Introductory statistics, 7th Ed., Pearson Education, New York.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 16Issue 1March 2010
Pages: 93 - 101

History

Received: Feb 15, 2008
Accepted: Aug 22, 2009
Published online: Feb 12, 2010
Published in print: Mar 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Qingbin Cui [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. E-mail: [email protected]
Philip W. Johnson [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487. E-mail: [email protected]
Deepak Sharma [email protected]
Graduate Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. E-mail: [email protected]
Mehmet Emre Bayraktar [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Management, Florida International Univ., Miami, FL 33174. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share