Optimal Sampling of Infrastructure Condition: Motivation, Formulation, and Evaluation
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 15, Issue 4
Abstract
Infrastructure management is the process through which inspection, maintenance, and rehabilitation decisions are made to minimize total life-cycle cost. Condition measurement, spatial sampling, and forecasting introduce uncertainty into the process. The first and third uncertainties are captured in the infrastructure management literature. However, the second has not been recognized and quantified. This study focuses on motivating the incorporation of the spatial sampling uncertainty in decision-making, quantifying this uncertainty, and investigating its effect on the expected minimum life-cycle cost. Evaluation measures are defined to assess the contributions of the developed framework, namely incorporating uncertainty due to spatial sampling in the decision-making process and selecting the sample size optimally. A numerical analysis indicates that in general both contributions are important under a wide range of realistic scenarios and the implications of the combined effects on minimizing life-cycle cost and long-term budget planning are marked.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by US National Science Foundation Grant No. UNSPECIFIED0093452.
References
Ben-Akiva, M., and Gopinath, D. (1995). “Modeling infrastructure performance and user costs.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(1), 33–43.
Ben-Akiva, M., Humplick, F., Madanat, S., and Ramaswamy, R. (1993). “Decision-making under uncertainty in infrastructure management: The latent performance approach.” J. Transp. Eng., 119(1), 43–58.
Carnahan, J. V., Davis, W. J., Shahin, M. Y., Keane, P. L., and Wu, M. I. (1987). “Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management.” J. Transp. Eng., 113(5), 554–572.
Casella, G., and Berge, R. (2002). Statistical inference, Duxbury, Pacific Grove, Calif.
Cressie, N. (1993). Statistics for spatial data, Wiley, New York.
Ellis, J. H., Jiang, M., and Corrotis, R. B. (1995). “Inspection, maintenance, and repair with partial observability.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(2), 92–99.
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. (2003). Office of Policy Homepage, ⟨http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs02/pdf/fa4e.pdf⟩.
Golabi, K., Kulkarni, R. B., and Way, G. B. (1982). “A statewide pavement management system.” Interfaces, 12(6), 5–21.
Gong, L. (2006). “Optimal spatial sampling of infrastructure condition: A life-cycle-based approach under uncertainty.” Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Gong, L., and Mishalani, R. G. (2008). “Sensitivity of infrastructure inspection and maintenance decision making to condition and cost characteristics.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Hudosn, W. R., Elkins, G. E., Uddin, W., and Reilly, K. T. (1987). “Improved methods and equipment to conduct pavement distress surveys.” Publication FHwA-TS-87-21, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Humplick, F. (1992). “Highway pavement distress evaluation: Modeling measurement error.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 26B, 135–154.
Madanat, S. M. (1991). “Optimizing sequential decisions under measurement and forecasting uncertainty: Application to infrastructure inspection, maintenance and rehabilitation.” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
Madanat, S. M. (1993). “Optimal infrastructure management decisions under uncertainty.” Transp. Res., Part C: Emerg. Technol., 1(1), 77–88.
Madanat, S. M., and Ben-Akiva, M. (1994). “Optimal inspection and repair policies for infrastructure facilities.” Transp. Sci., 28(1), 55–62.
McGhee, K. H. (2004). “Automated pavement distress collection techniques: A synthesis of highway practice.” NCHRP synthesis 334, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Mishalani, R. G. (1993). “Extracting spatial information on infrastructure distress using a stochastic modeling approach: Application to highway maintenance decision making.” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
Mishalani, R. G., and Gong, L. (2008). “Evaluating the impact of pavement condition sampling advances on life-cycle management.” Transportation Research Record. 2068, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1–9.
Mishalani, R. G., and Gong, L. (2009). “Optimal infrastructure condition sampling over space and time for maintenance decision-making under uncertainty.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 43, 311–324.
Mishalani, R. G., and Koutsopoulos, H. N. (1995). “Uniform infrastructure fields: Definition and identification.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(1), 44–55.
Mishalani, R. G., and Koutsopoulos, H. N. (2002). “Modeling the spatial behavior of infrastructure condition.” Transp. Res., Part B: Methodol., 36, 171–194.
Sharaf, E. A., Reichelt, E., Shahin, M. Y., and Sinha, K. C. (1985). “Development of a methodology to estimate pavement maintenance and repair costs for different range of pavement condition index.” Transportation Research Record. 1123, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 30–39.
Smilowitz, K., and Madanat, S. (2000). “Optimal inspection and maintenance policies for infrastructure networks.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 15(1), 5–13.
Vadakpat, G., Stoffels, S., and Dixon, K. (2000). “Road user cost models for network-level pavement management.” Transportation Research Record. 1699, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 49–57.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 11, 2008
Accepted: May 11, 2009
Published online: Nov 13, 2009
Published in print: Dec 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.