Budgeting Performance-Based Winter Maintenance: Snow Influence on Highway Maintenance Cost
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 15, Issue 3
Abstract
Swedish contracting of winter maintenance is combined with weather-regulated payment since the beginning of the 1990’s. It reduces the weather risk for the contractor and has helped performance-based specifications to find acceptance. The performance-based approach was introduced to save costs and create incentives for innovation. Theory and practice are often unconnected since the mathematical links are lacking behind the political rhetoric around performance-based contracting. This study attempts to bridge some of the gap between theory and practice by linking a climate factor, snow, to highway maintenance costs. To handle the complexity of weather, an iterative process was assumed necessary, with simplification as a first step. An answer was achieved to the two research questions: which stations correlated best with costs and what the winter maintenance cost would be, given the snowfall at these stations. Once having achieved this answer under simplified circumstances (one weather parameter, one region, few observations, linear relationship), the assumptions were relaxed, one after the other, in second and third iterations, to increase the generalizeability of the method and the results. Maintenance cost and weather data of Washington state were used. The method can be used anywhere where the actual costs of the maintenance are known. In countries and regions with privatized highway maintenance, like in Sweden, British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario, the actual costs are not public. The lessons learned from this study may therefore be of particular interest to such privatized systems. The study supports that the Swedish road weather information system stations are in the right spots and proposes snowfall to weather regulate the payment to the contractor.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Arnek, M. (2002). “Empirical essays on procurement and regulation.” Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden.
Crown, W. H. (1998). Statistical models for the social and behavioral sciences: Multiple regression and limited-dependent variable models, Praeger, Westport, Conn.
Liljegren, E. (2003). “Konkurrensutsättning av Vägverkets drift-och underhålls-verksamhet (Contracting the maintenance of the Swedish road administration).” Ph.D. thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
MIT. (2003). Sloan School of Management—Lecture slides, ⟨http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdon lyres/Sloan-School-of-Management/15-063Communicating-With-DataSummer2003/F904D01C-8EA7-4C93-B03C-CF3E13115044/0/lecture16.pdf⟩ (May 18, 2006).
Olejnik, S., and Mills, J. (2000). “Using Wherry’s adjusted R2 and Mallow’s Cp for model selection from all possible regressions.” J. Exp. Educ., 68(4), 365–380.
Österberg, R. (2003). “Contracting out public services.” Ph.D. thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ramanathan, R. (2002). Introductory econometrics with applications, 5th ed., Harcourt, San Diego, ⟨http://dss.ucsd.edu/~rramanat, www.swcollege.com/bef/economics.html⟩ (Nov. 27, 2006).
Ribreau, N. (2004). “Synopsis of WSDOT’s review of highway maintenance outsourcing experience: Transportation Research Board Committee A3C01.” Maintenance and Operations Management. Proc., TRB Annual Conf., Washington D.C. ⟨http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Maintenance/pdf/outsourcing.pdf⟩ (July 9, 2009).
Segal, G., and Montague, E. (2004). “Competitive contracting for highway maintenance: Lessons learned from national experience.” Rep. Prepared for Washington Policy Center, Seattle, ⟨http://www.wips.org/Transportation/PBMontagueSegalReasonHighway Maintenance.htm⟩ (Nov. 15, 2005).
Stenbeck, T. (2006). “Effects of outsourcing and performance-based specifications on innovations.” Transportation Research Record. 1948, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C, 3–8.
Stenbeck, T. (2007). “Promoting innovation in transportation infrastructure maintenance.” Ph.D. thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Strong, C., and Shvetsov, Y. (2006). “Part 5: Surface transportation weather: Development of roadway weather severity index.” Transportation Research Record. 1948, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 161–169.
Strong, C., Shvetsov, Y., and Sharp, J. (2005). “Development of a roadway weather severity index.” Final Rep. Prepared for the U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Showcase Evaluation #16, Western Transportation Institute, College of Engineering, Montana State Univ., Bozeman, Mont., ⟨http://www.westerntransportationinstitute.org/documents/reports/426711_final_report.pdf⟩ (Nov. 2, 2007).
Swedish Road Administration (SRA). (2005). Swedish Road Administration, ⟨http://www.vv.se/filer/DoU_katalogen/Vinter2003/V%C3%A4gverkets%20Ers%C3%A4ttningsmodell%20F%C3%B6%20Vinterv%C3%A4gh%C3%A5llning%20Rev%20200%E2%80%A6.pdf⟩ (Nov. 1, 2005).
Warne, T. (2003). “State DOT outsourcing and private-sector utilization.” NCHRP Synthesis Rep. No. 313, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC). (2006). Western Regional Climate Center, ⟨http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/summary/climsmwa. html⟩ (Feb. 1, 2006).
Wherry, R. J. (1931). “A new formula for predicting the shrinkage of the coefficient of multiple correlation.” Ann. Math. Stat., 2, 440–457.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 26, 2007
Accepted: Oct 18, 2007
Published online: Aug 14, 2009
Published in print: Sep 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.