Transportation Infrastructure Performance Modeling through Seemingly Unrelated Regression Systems
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 14, Issue 2
Abstract
Deterioration modeling plays a central role in performance prediction, a key component in transportation infrastructure system management. The deterioration of a facility can be expressed in terms of numerous indicators. For instance, in the case of highway pavements, these indicators range from panel ratings (such as pavement serviceability rating) to distress variables (such as percentage of surface cracking and rut depth). Different indicators capture different deterioration mechanisms; however, they may be correlated to each other. Numerous studies have been conducted involving modeling the deterioration of transportation facilities. Empirical regression has proved to be an effective way to characterize the relationship between the explanatory variables and dependent variable (performance indicator). The majority of these models were established with the focus on each individual performance indicator separately and independently. However, one type of indicator does not sufficiently capture the performance of a facility. For instance, while a softer binder may improve fatigue cracking performance, it could possibly be detrimental to rutting performance. As a result, the facility deterioration mechanism may not be fully characterized by single models. Since decision making in infrastructure management usually relies on a series of different performance indicators, the systematic considerations of these indicators is imperative. In this study, a flexible and statistically sound modeling approach is presented to jointly account for the performance of a transportation facility based on two indicators. A system of nonlinear structured econometric models is established to capture different deterioration processes in terms of these indicators. Due to the fact that the selected indicators represent the performance of a single section from different aspects, the correlation among the models in the system is particularly addressed. A case study is presented to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology with focus on in-service highway pavements. Two major indicators, international roughness index and rut depth, widely used in characterizing flexible pavement performance, are adopted and analyzed in the model system. The results demonstrate that: (1) different indicators are associated with different deterioration mechanisms reflected through their respective parameters; (2) the correlation of different deterioration mechanisms and relation of parameters across the models can be captured through relevant statistics; and (3) model estimation is efficient when accounting for the correlation among the models.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers express their sincere thanks to MnRoad project personnel, in particular Mr. Ben Worel, for providing the data used to develop the models presented in this article.
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1993). “AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures.” Washington, D.C.
Archilla, A. R. (2006). “Repeated measurement data analysis in pavement deterioration modeling.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12(3), 163–173.
Archilla, A. R., and Madanat, S. M. (2001). “Estimation of rutting models by combining data from different sources.” J. Transp. Eng. 127(5), 379–389.
Greene, W. (2002). Econometric analysis, 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Hass, R., Hudson, W. R., and Zaniewski, J. (1994). Modern pavement management, Krieger, Malabar, Fla.
Highway Research Board (HRB). (1962). “The AASHO road test.” Special Report Nos. 61A through 61G and 73, Washington, D.C.
Hong, F., and Prozzi, J. A. (2006). “Estimation of pavement performance deterioration using Bayesian approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 12(2), 77–86.
Loizos, A., and Karlaftis, M. G. (2005). “Prediction of pavement cracking initiation from in-service pavements: A duration model approach.” Transportation Research Record. 1940, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 38–42.
MnDOT. (2006). ⟨http://www.mrr.dot.state.mn.us/research/Mn/Road_Project/⟩ (January 2006).
Palmquist, D., Worel, B., and Zerfas, W. (2002). 2002 MnRoad Hot-Mix Asphalt Mainline Test Cell Condition Report, Office of Materials and Road Research, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation.
Paterson, W. D. O. (1987). “Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management.” Highway design and maintenance series, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Prozzi, J. A., and Madanat, S. M. (2000). “Analysis of experimental pavement failure data using probabilistic duration models.” Transportation Research Record. 1699, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 87–94.
Prozzi, J. A., and Madanat, S. M. (2003). “Incremental nonlinear model for predicting pavement serviceability.” J. Transp. Eng., 129(6), 635–641.
Prozzi, J. A., and Madanat, S. M. (2004). “Development of pavement performance models by combining experimental and field data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 10(1), 9–22.
Shahin, M. Y., Nunez, M. M., Troten, M. R., Carpenter, S. H., and Sameh, A. (1988). “New techniques for modeling pavement deterioration.” Transportation Research Record. 1123, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 40–46.
Small, K., and Winston, C. (1988). “Optimal highway durability.” Am. Econ. Rev., 78(3), 560–569.
Ullidtz, P. (1987). Pavement analysis, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G., and Mannering, F. L. (2003). Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 9, 2006
Accepted: Mar 16, 2007
Published online: Jun 1, 2008
Published in print: Jun 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.