TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 1, 2008

Transportation Infrastructure Performance Modeling through Seemingly Unrelated Regression Systems

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 14, Issue 2

Abstract

Deterioration modeling plays a central role in performance prediction, a key component in transportation infrastructure system management. The deterioration of a facility can be expressed in terms of numerous indicators. For instance, in the case of highway pavements, these indicators range from panel ratings (such as pavement serviceability rating) to distress variables (such as percentage of surface cracking and rut depth). Different indicators capture different deterioration mechanisms; however, they may be correlated to each other. Numerous studies have been conducted involving modeling the deterioration of transportation facilities. Empirical regression has proved to be an effective way to characterize the relationship between the explanatory variables and dependent variable (performance indicator). The majority of these models were established with the focus on each individual performance indicator separately and independently. However, one type of indicator does not sufficiently capture the performance of a facility. For instance, while a softer binder may improve fatigue cracking performance, it could possibly be detrimental to rutting performance. As a result, the facility deterioration mechanism may not be fully characterized by single models. Since decision making in infrastructure management usually relies on a series of different performance indicators, the systematic considerations of these indicators is imperative. In this study, a flexible and statistically sound modeling approach is presented to jointly account for the performance of a transportation facility based on two indicators. A system of nonlinear structured econometric models is established to capture different deterioration processes in terms of these indicators. Due to the fact that the selected indicators represent the performance of a single section from different aspects, the correlation among the models in the system is particularly addressed. A case study is presented to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology with focus on in-service highway pavements. Two major indicators, international roughness index and rut depth, widely used in characterizing flexible pavement performance, are adopted and analyzed in the model system. The results demonstrate that: (1) different indicators are associated with different deterioration mechanisms reflected through their respective parameters; (2) the correlation of different deterioration mechanisms and relation of parameters across the models can be captured through relevant statistics; and (3) model estimation is efficient when accounting for the correlation among the models.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers express their sincere thanks to MnRoad project personnel, in particular Mr. Ben Worel, for providing the data used to develop the models presented in this article.

References

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1993). “AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures.” Washington, D.C.
Archilla, A. R. (2006). “Repeated measurement data analysis in pavement deterioration modeling.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12(3), 163–173.
Archilla, A. R., and Madanat, S. M. (2001). “Estimation of rutting models by combining data from different sources.” J. Transp. Eng. 127(5), 379–389.
Greene, W. (2002). Econometric analysis, 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Hass, R., Hudson, W. R., and Zaniewski, J. (1994). Modern pavement management, Krieger, Malabar, Fla.
Highway Research Board (HRB). (1962). “The AASHO road test.” Special Report Nos. 61A through 61G and 73, Washington, D.C.
Hong, F., and Prozzi, J. A. (2006). “Estimation of pavement performance deterioration using Bayesian approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 12(2), 77–86.
Loizos, A., and Karlaftis, M. G. (2005). “Prediction of pavement cracking initiation from in-service pavements: A duration model approach.” Transportation Research Record. 1940, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 38–42.
Palmquist, D., Worel, B., and Zerfas, W. (2002). 2002 MnRoad Hot-Mix Asphalt Mainline Test Cell Condition Report, Office of Materials and Road Research, Minnesota Dept. of Transportation.
Paterson, W. D. O. (1987). “Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management.” Highway design and maintenance series, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Prozzi, J. A., and Madanat, S. M. (2000). “Analysis of experimental pavement failure data using probabilistic duration models.” Transportation Research Record. 1699, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 87–94.
Prozzi, J. A., and Madanat, S. M. (2003). “Incremental nonlinear model for predicting pavement serviceability.” J. Transp. Eng., 129(6), 635–641.
Prozzi, J. A., and Madanat, S. M. (2004). “Development of pavement performance models by combining experimental and field data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 10(1), 9–22.
Shahin, M. Y., Nunez, M. M., Troten, M. R., Carpenter, S. H., and Sameh, A. (1988). “New techniques for modeling pavement deterioration.” Transportation Research Record. 1123, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 40–46.
Small, K., and Winston, C. (1988). “Optimal highway durability.” Am. Econ. Rev., 78(3), 560–569.
Ullidtz, P. (1987). Pavement analysis, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G., and Mannering, F. L. (2003). Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 14Issue 2June 2008
Pages: 129 - 137

History

Received: Aug 9, 2006
Accepted: Mar 16, 2007
Published online: Jun 1, 2008
Published in print: Jun 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jorge A. Prozzi [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, ECJ 6.112, Austin, TX 78712 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, ECJ 6.510, Austin, TX 78712. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share