Costs and Benefits of Home-Based Telecommuting: A Monte Carlo Simulation Model Incorporating Telecommuter, Employer, and Public Sector Perspectives
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 13, Issue 1
Abstract
This paper reviews and utilizes the current body of telecommuting related research to study the costs and benefits of home-based telecommuting. Monte Carlo simulation methods were utilized to help account for costs or benefits that remain highly variable or have not been well documented by past research. This study illustrates the conditions under which the business case for telecommuting is supported or weakened. Conditions for the employee (the telecommuter) are generally most favorable when: (1) the employer bears the equipment cost; (2) commute distances are above average; (3) the commute vehicle has below-average fuel economy; (4) travel time is highly valued; and (5) telecommuting is frequent, while conditions for the employer are most favorable when: (1) the telecommuter bears the equipment cost; (2) there is low telecommuter attrition; (3) the employee is highly productive on telecommuting days; (4) the employee’s time is highly valued; and (5) telecommuting is frequent. For the employer, telecommuting is also favorable if parking and office space savings are realized. While public sector benefits are conceivable, they remain insignificant in most situations because the impacts on the transportation network are probably not concentrated enough over a specific transportation corridor to realize infrastructure benefits and not quantified or valued enough within a regional air district to realize significant air quality benefits. Further, the public sector loses fuel tax revenue. Altogether, this paper provides insight into the potential public sector impacts of telecommuting, as well as the federal, state, regional, and local public policy implications that arise when telecommuting is considered among other transportation demand management alternatives.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project was partially funded by Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH) of the University of California, in cooperation with the State of California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency, Department of Transportation; and the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. The contents reflect the views of the writers who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California.
References
American Automobile Association (AAA). (1998). Your driving costs, 1998 Ed., Runzheimer International, Park Rochester, Wis.
American Petroleum Institute (API). (1998). “How much we pay for gasoline: 1997 Annual review.” Publication No. R26903, Washington, D.C., April.
Bernardino, A., and Ben-Akiva, M. (1996). “Modeling the process of adoption of telecommuting: A comprehensive framework.” Transportation Research Record. 1552, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 161–170.
Bernardino, A. T., Ben-Akiva, M., and Salomon, I. (1993). “Stated-preference approach to modeling the adoption of telecommuting.” Transportation Research Record. 1413, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 22–30.
Blackman, W. A., Jr. (1974). “The market dynamics of technological substitutions.” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 6(1974), 41–63.
California Air Resources Board (ARB). (1996). Methodology for estimating emissions from on-road motor vehicles, Vol. II: EMFAC7G, Sacramento, Calif.
County of San Diego Department of Public Works (CSD-DPW). (1990). Telecommuting Pilot Study Final Rep., San Diego.
Dowling Associates, Inc. (1999). “ travel time savings project.” Task No. 2 Draft Rep.: Evaluation of Methodology Prepared for the Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Olympia, Wash.
Duxbury, L. E., Higgins, C. A., and Irving, R. H. (1987). “Attitudes of managers and employees to telecommuting.” INFOR, 25(3), 273–285.
Finlay, S. (1991). “Benefits, costs, and policy strategies for telecommuting in greater Vancouver.” Master’s thesis, Simon Fraser Univ., Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
Frankel, G. (1996). “Can the cost of a home computer be written off?” Tax Adviser, 27(4), 238–242, ⟨http://www.aicpa.org/pubs/taxadv/index.htm⟩.
Gordon, G. (1997). “Telecommuters by the millions—11 million, to be exact.” Telecommuting Review: The Gordon Rep., 14(8), 14–16.
Gordon, G. E., and Kelly, M. M. (1986). Telecommuting: How to make it work for you and your company, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Gray, M., Hodson, N., and Gordon, G. (1993). Teleworking explained, Wiley, New York.
Handy, S. L., and Mokhtarian, P. L. (1995). “Planning for telecommuting: Measurement and policy issues.” J. Am. Plan. Assn., 61(1), 99–111.
Handy, S. L., and Mokhtarian, P. L. (1996). “Forecasting telecommuting.” Transportation, 23(1), 163–190.
JALA Associates, Inc. (1990). The State of California Telecommuting Pilot Project Final Rep., Dept. of General Services, State of California, Sacramento, Calif.
JALA International, Inc. (1993). City of Los Angeles Telecommuting Project Final Rep., Dept. of Telecommunications, City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
Katz, A. I. (1987). “The management, control, and evaluation of a telecommuting project: A case study.” Inf. Manage., 13(4), 179–190.
Krusi, F. E. (1997). “Departmental guidance for the valuation of travel time in economic analysis.” U.S. Dept. of Transportation memorandum from the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy, (April 9, 1997), Washington, D.C.
Kugelmass, J. (1995). Telecommuting: A manager’s guide to flexible work arrangements, Lexington Books, New York.
Kunkle, R. (1992). “Puget sound telecommuting demonstration case studies.” Washington State Energy Office Publication 92-146, Olympia, Wash., November.
Mahmassani, H. S., Yen, J.-R., Herman, R., and Sullivan, M. A. (1993). “Employee attitudes and stated preferences toward telecommuting: An exploratory analysis.” Transportation Research Record. 1413, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 31–41.
Mokhtarian, P. L. (1998). “A synthetic approach to estimating the impacts of telecommuting on travel.” Urban Stud., 35(2), 215–241.
Mokhtarian, P. L., Handy, S. L., and Salomon, I. (1995). “Methodological issues in the estimation of travel, energy, and air quality impacts of telecommuting.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 29A(4), 283–302.
Mokhtarian, P. L., and Salomon, I. (1996). “Modeling the choice of telecommuting. 3: Identifying the choice set and estimating binary choice models for technology-based alternatives.” Envir. Plan. A, 28(10), 1877–1894.
Mokhtarian, P. L., and Salomon, I. (1997). “Modeling the desire to telecommute: The importance of attitudinal factors in behavioral models.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 31A(1), 35–50.
Mokhtarian, P. L., Salomon, I., and Choo, S. (2005). “Measuring the measurable: Why can’t we agree on the number of telecommuters in the US?” Quality and Quantity, 39, 423–452.
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. (1991).“The impacts of parking prices on commuter travel.” Washington, D.C., December.
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle. (1993). “Managing employee parking in a changing market.” Service Development Division Pamphlet, Seattle, November.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1997). “Automotive Fuel Economy Program, Twenty-Second Annual Report to Congress, Calendar Year 1997.” ⟨http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/studies/fuelecon/⟩.
Nilles, J. M. (1994). Making telecommuting happen: A guide for telemanagers and telecommuters, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Reed, T. L., Niemeier, D. A., and Rutherford, G. S. (1995). “Prioritization of capacity improvements.” Publication No. WA-RD 295.1, Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Olympia, Wash.
Schrank, D., and Lomax, T. (1999). The 1999 Annual Mobility Rep.—Information for Urban America, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Tex.
Shafizadeh, K., Mokhtarian, P. L., Niemeier, D., and Salomon, I. (2000a). “The costs and benefits of telecommuting: An evaluation of micro-scale studies and promotional literature.” California PATH Research Rep. No. UCB-ITS-PRR-2000-13, Berkeley, Calif.
Shafizadeh, K., Mokhtarian, P. L., Niemeier, D., and Salomon, I. (2000b). “The costs and benefits of telecommuting.” California PATH Research Rep. No. UCB-ITS-PRR-2000-20, Berkeley, Calif., November.
Shafizadeh, K., Niemeier, D. A., Mokhtarian, P. L., and Salomon, I. (1998). “The costs and benefits of telecommuting: An evaluation of macro-scale literature.” Research Rep. No. UCD-ITS-RR-97-23, Institute of Transportation Studies, Univ. of California, Davis, Calif.
Shoup, D. (1997). “Evaluating the effects of parking cash out: Eight case studies.” Rep. Prepared for California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, Calif.
Shoup, D., and Breinholt, M. J. (1997). “Employer-paid parking: Anationwide survey of employers’ parking subsidy policies.” The full social costs and benefits of transportation, D. Greene, D. Jones, and M. Delucchi, eds., Springer, Berlin, 371–385.
Society of Industrial and Office Realtors. (1998). Comparative statistics of industrial and office real estate markets, Washington, D.C.
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). (1988). Evaluation Rep.: Telecommuting Pilot Project for the Southern California Association of Governments, Environmental Planning Dept., Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, Data User Services Division. (1998). Statistical abstract of the United States 1997, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE). (1994). Energy, emissions, and social consequences of telecommuting, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT). (1993). Transportation implications of telecommuting, Office of the Secretary. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT). (1997). Successful Telecommuting Programs in the Public and Private Sectors: A Rep. for Congress, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1992). “Cost of owning and operating automobiles, vans, and light trucks, 1991.” FHWA Publication No. FHWA-PL-92-019, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (1997). “1995 NPTS early results report.” ⟨http://www.cta.ornl.gov/npts/1995/doc/NPTS_Booklet.pdf⟩.
Varma, K. V., Ho, C.-I., Stanek, D. M., and Mokhtarian, P. L. (1998). “Duration and frequency of telecenter use: Once a telecommuter, always a telecommuter?” Transp. Res., Part C: Emerg. Technol., 6(1–2), 47–68.
Wang, M. Q., and Santini, D. J. (1995). “Monetary values of air pollutant emission in various U.S. regions.” Transportation Research Record. 1475, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 33–41.
Westfall, R. D. (1997). “Remote work: A conceptual perspective on the demand for telecommuting.” Doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate Univ., Claremont, Calif.
Yen, J.-R. (2002). “The economic evaluation of telecommuting on highway infrastructure: A case study of Taiwan.” Economic evaluation of advanced technologies: Techniques and case studies, J. P. Lavelle, H. R. Liggitt, and H. R. Parsaei, eds., Taylor & Francis, New York, 191–199.
Yen, J.-R., Mahmassani, H. S., and Herman, R. (1994). “Employer attitudes and stated preferences toward telecommuting: An exploratory analysis.” Transportation Research Record. 1463, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 15–25.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 13 • Issue 1 • March 2007
Pages: 12 - 25
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Mar 30, 2004
Accepted: Sep 22, 2005
Published online: Mar 1, 2007
Published in print: Mar 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.