Privatization of Municipal Services: Sustainability Issues of Production and Provision
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 10, Issue 4
Abstract
Privatization is an accepted strategy to improve the economic efficiency and quality of services provided by municipal infrastructure. However, the impact of using the private market to allocate public resources has not been adequately researched. In this paper, the effects of the privatization of municipal services as public policy are assessed. The assessment is based on a detailed review of the privatization literature across disciplines and a more focused analysis of efforts in two cities. The supporting literature emphasizes that municipal infrastructure decisions play a big role shaping a community; therefore local government needs to maintain accountability to its citizens. Maintaining accountability for essential municipal services while having flexible financing options may require the separation of the production of a service from the provision of that service. The examples from the two cities agree with these conclusions and demonstrate that concessions are the preferred privatization strategy for essential municipal services. The examples also provide a variety of creative strategies to enhance the competitive environment for concessions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ASCE. (2001). “The 2001 report card for America’s infrastructure.” 〈http://www.asce.org〉 (Dec. 12, 2002).
2.
“Berlin airport plans hit another snag.” (2003). International Herald Tribune, Feb. 8.
3.
Berliner. ( 2003). “Berliner Flughafen wird privat gebaut.” Frankfurter Allgeneine Zeitung, March 11 (Original 2002, August 30).
4.
Blackstone, E., and Simon, H. (1997). “Private eyes: A tale of four cities.” American City County, 112(2), 54–58.
5.
Clausen, H., and Rothgang, M. (2002). “Innovations and sustainability in the water services sectors: Institutional framework, actors, and policy instruments.” Proc., Workshop for Recent Advances in Applied Infrastructure Research, 〈http://wip.tu-berlin.de/workshop/2002/papers/tu-berliwiworksho2002-papeclauserothgang-wateinnovations.pdf〉 (Jan. 6, 2004).
6.
Cook, P. (1999). “Privatization and utility regulation in developing countries: The lessons so far.” Ann. Public Coop. Econ.,70(4), 549–587.
7.
Crampes, C., and Estache, A. (1996). “Regulating water concessions.” Public Policy for the Private Sector Note No. 91, World Bank, Washington D.C.
8.
Denzer, G. (2001). “German unity trunk road planning and construction.” 2001 Fulbright German Studies Summer Seminar, Berlin.
9.
Dnes, A.W. (1995). “Franchising and privatization.” Public Policy for the Private Sector Note No. 40, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
10.
Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., and Speck, J. (2000). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and decline of the American dream, North Point, New York.
11.
Dyck, I. J. (1997). “Privatization in Eastern Germany: Management selection and economic transition.” Am. Econ. Rev., 87(4), 565–597.
12.
Golding, C. (2000). “A wastewater treatment privatization case study: Indianapolis Indiana.” Environment Probe Online Publications, EV 546, 〈http://www.environmentprobe.org/enviroprobe/pubs/Ev546.htm〉 (July 21, 2003).
13.
Goldsmith, S. (1997). Resurrecting urban America, Regency, Washington, D.C.
14.
Greenough, G., Eggum, T., Ford, U. G., Grigg, N. S., and Sizer, E. (1999). “Public works delivery systems in North America: Private and public approaches including managed competition.” Public Works Manage. Policy, 4(1), 41–49.
15.
Guenter, S. (2001). “Urban development in Germany.” 2001 Fulbright German Studies Summer Seminar, Berlin Ministry of Urban Develop-ment, Berlin.
16.
Indianapolis Water Company. (2003). Home page, Indianapolis, Ind., 〈http://www.iwcr.com〉 (July 22, 2003).
17.
Kappler, A. (1999). Facts about Germany, Press and Information Office of the Federal Government, Germany.
18.
Levine, M. (2002). “Inner-city revitalization and gentrification: The case of Prezlauer Berg (Berlin) Germany.” Berlin in America Symposium, University of Iowa, Des Moines, Iowa.
19.
Lobina, E., and Hall, D. (2000). “Public sector alternatives to water supply and sewerage privatization: Case studies.” Int. J. Water Resour. Dev., 16(1), 25–55.
20.
Lovei, M., and Gentry, B. (2002). The environmental implications of privatization: Lessons for developing countries, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
21.
Mikesell, J.L. (1995). Fiscal administration: Analysis and applications for the public sector, Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth, Tex.
22.
Miller, A. N., (1997). “Ideological motivations of privatization in Great Britain versus developing countries.” J. Int. Affairs, 50(2), 391–408.
23.
Morris, E. D., and Travis, R. L. (2003). “Privatization in state agencies: A focus on clean water.” Public Works Manage. Policy, 7(4), 243–255.
24.
Nagengast, E. (1995). “Eastern Europe and Germany’s Treuhandanstalt.” East Eur. Q., 29(2), 189–206.
25.
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (2002). Privatization of water services in the United States: An assessment of issues and experiences, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
26.
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD). (2002). Recent privatization trends in OECD countries, 〈http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00031000/M00031987.pdf〉 (Dec. 12).
27.
“Peterson applauds IURC decision.” (2002). Press release, 〈http://www.indygov.org/mayor/press/2002/march/02-03-28.htm〉 (December 19).
28.
Rachels, J. (1941). The elements of moral philosophy, McGraw-Hill, New York.
29.
Rubin, D.K. (2002). “Rx for hospitals’ transportation: Build your very own rail system.” ENR, August 19, 18–20.
30.
Schoelkopf, K. (2003a). “Airport BBI: Baubeggin verzögert sich weiter.” Berliner Morgenpost, 〈http://morgenpost.berlin1.de/archive2003/031010/berlin/story634037.html〉 (Jan. 7, 2004).
31.
Schoelkopf, K. (2003b). “BBI könnte gunstiger warden.” Berliner Morgenpost 〈http://morgenpost.berlin1.de/archive2003/031005/wirtschaft/story633014.html〉 (Jan. 7, 2004).
32.
Schwelder, H.U. (2001). “Berlin—a city twice unique.” 2001 Fulbright German Studies Summer Seminar, Berlin.
33.
Sepalla, O. T., Hukka, J. J., and Katko, T. S. (2001). “Public-private partnerships in water and sewerage services: Privatization for profit or improvement of service and performance?” Public Works Manage. Policy, 6(1), 42–58.
34.
Short, T. J. (1997). “Infrastructure visionaries.” Civ. Eng. Mag., 67(8), 63–64.
35.
Taverna, M. A. (1997). “Berlin oks airport privatization, new international facility.” Aviat. Week Space Technol., 147(14), 44.
36.
Throgmorton, J.A. (2002). “Cities construct people but people construct cities: An introduction and overview for the Berlin in America Symposium.” Berlin in America Symposium, University of Iowa, Des Moines, Iowa.
37.
United States Government Accounting Office(USGAO). (1996). “Child support enforcement: Early results on comparison of private and public offices.” GAO/HEHS-97-4, USGAO, Washington, D.C.
38.
van den Berg, C. (2000). “Water concessions.” Public Policy for the Private Sector Note No. 217, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
39.
Ward, J. (2002). “(Anti-) Americanism in the new Berlin: Fears and contagions in city-building.” Berlin in America Symposium, University ofIowa, Des Moines, Iowa.
40.
Webb, M., and Ehrbardt, J. (1998). “Improving water services through competition.” Public Policy for the Private Sector Note No. 164, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
41.
Weingandt, C. (2000). Urban development and urban policy in Germany: An overview, Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning, Bonn, Germany.
42.
Wolf, H. (2003). “Mitigation the hold-up problem.” Workshop on Applied Infrastructure Research, 〈http://wip.tu-berlin.de/workshop/2003/papers/index.htm〉 (Jan. 16, 2004).
43.
Worsnop, R. L. (1996). “Privatizing government services.” Congressional Q. Researcher, 6(30), 699–716.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 10 • Issue 4 • December 2004
Pages: 139 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 15, 2004
Published in print: Dec 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.