TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 16, 2004

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Coal Gasification Power Generation Systems

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 10, Issue 3

Abstract

Life-cycle assessments (LCAs) are computed for coal gasification-based electricity generation technologies for emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), principally CO2. Two approaches for computing LCAs are compared for construction and operation of integrated coal-gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) plants: a traditional process-based approach, and one based on economic input-output analysis, called economic input-output life-cycle assessment (EIO-LCA). It is shown that EIO-LCA provides a more complete accounting for emissions incurred during construction, resulting in larger estimates of emissions. For plant construction, process-based LCA computes emissions that approximate a subset of emissions computed via the EIO-LCA method. For plant operation, however, only emissions due to mining and consumption of coal at the plant are significant, and both methods of analysis give essentially equivalent results. For conventional coal-based power generators, and even for those that would capture 90% of carbon emissions, GHG emissions during a typical operating life of 30 to 50 years dominate the life cycle. Literature values for life-cycle emissions of GHGs for a number of renewable technologies are compared to emissions from IGCC systems with and without carbon capture and from natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) systems without capture. Lowest life-cycle emissions are achieved with dammed hydropower and wind farms. IGCC with 90% CO2 capture exhibits lower life-cycle GHG emissions than NGCC and solar photovoltaic systems.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Anderson, R. E., et al. (2000). “A unique process for production of environmentally clean electric power using fossil fuels.” 8th Int. Symp. on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery (ISROMAC-8).
Battelle Memorial Institute. (1997). Life Cycle Advantage startup guide, Version 1.0, Columbus, Ohio.
Berry, J. E., et al. (1994). Full fuel cycle study on power generation schemes incorporating the capture and disposal of carbon dioxide, International Energy Agency, ETSU, Harwell, U.K.
Buchanan, T. L., et al. (1998). “Market-based advanced coal power systems.” Final Rep. (Contract No. DE-AC01-94FE62747), U.S. Dept. of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, Pittsburgh, 〈http://www.netl.doe.gov/coalpower/gasification/pubs/pdf/marketbased_systems_report.pdf〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). (2003a). Survey of current business (November 2003), Table C.1: GDP and Other Major NIPA Series, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈www.bea.doc.gov/bea/ARTICLES/2003/11November/d_pages/1103DpgC.pdf〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). (2003b). “The use of commodities by industries before redefinitions.” 1997 Annual Tables, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 〈www.bea.gov/industry/iotables〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU). (2002). Economic input-output life cycle assessment, Green Design Initiative, Pittsburgh, 〈www.EIOLCA.net〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2000a). Annual energy outlook 2001, 98–99, 〈www.eia.doe.gov〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2000b). Coal energy industry annual 2000, 〈www.eia.doe.gov〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2001). Emissions of greenhouse gases in the United States 2001, Table B2, 〈www.eia.doe.gov〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2002a). Annual energy review 2002, Table A5, 〈www.eia.doe.gov〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2002b). Annual energy review 2002, Table 7.8, 〈www.eia.doe.gov〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2002c). International energy outlook 2002, Table A10, 〈www.eia.doe.gov〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). (2000). “Evaluation of innovative fossil fuel power plants with CO2 removal.” Rep. No. 1000316, Palo Alto, Calif., U.S. Dept. of Energy—Office of Fossil Energy, Germantown, Md., and U.S. Dept. of Energy/NETL, Pittsburgh, 〈http://www.netl.doe.gov/coalpower/gasification/pubs/pdf/EpriReport.PDF〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Gorokhov, V., Manfredo, L., Ramezan, M., Ratafia-Brown, J., and Stiegel, G.(2002). “Life cycle analysis of advanced power generation systems.” Technology, 8, 217–228.
Hendrickson, C. T., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., and Lave, L. B.(1998). “Economic input-output models for environmental life cycle assessment.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(47), 184A–191A.
Hoffert, M. I., et al. (2002). “Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: Energy for a greenhouse planet.” Science, 298, 981–987.
Houghton, J. T., et al., eds. (1995). Radiative forcing of climate change and an evaluation of the IPCC IS92 emissions scenarios, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Houghton, J. T., and Ding, Y., eds. (2001). “Climate change 2001: The scientific basis.” Table 6.7, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 〈www.ipcc.ch〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Kuhbach, P. D., and Planting, M. A. (2001). “Annual input-output accounts of the U.S. Economy, 1997.” Survey of Current Business, January, 9–43, 〈www.bea.doc.gov/bea/articles/national/inputout/2001/0101aio.pdf〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Lenzen, M.(2001). “Errors in conventional and input-output-based life cycle assessments.” J. Industrial Ecology, 4(5), 127–148.
Mathieu, P., and Iantovski, E.(1998). “Presentation of an innovative zero-emission cycle for mitigating the global climate change.” Int. J. Applied Thermodynamics, 1(1–4), 21.
Pacca, S., and Horvath, A.(2002). “Greenhouse gas emissions from building and operating electric power plants in the Upper Colorado River Basin.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(14), 3194–3200.
Ruether, J., Dahowski, R., Ramezan, M., and Schmidt, C. (2002). “Prospects for early deployment of power plants employing carbon capture.” Electric Utilities Environmental Conf., 〈www.netl.doe.gov/products/ccps/index.html〉 (Apr. 1, 2003).
Ruether, J., Le, P., and White, C.(2000). “A zero-CO2 emission power cycle using coal.” Technology,7S, 95–101.
Schoff, R. L., Buchanan, T. L., Holt, N. A. H., White, J. S., Wolk, R. H., and Booras, G. (2002). “Updated performance and cost estimates for innovative fossil fuel cycles incorporating CO2 removal.” Pittsburgh Coal Conf. (CD-ROM), University of Pittsburg, Pittsburgh.
Simbeck, D., and McDonald, M. (2000). “Existing coal power plant retrofit CO2 control options analysis.” 5th Int. Conf. on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies.
Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). (1993). “A conceptual framework for life-cycle impact assessment.” SETAC, Pensacola, Fla.
Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). (1998). “Evolution and development of the conceptual framework and methodology of life-cycle impact assessment.” SETAC, Pensacola, Fla.
Suh, S. (2001). European network of environmental input-output analysis, 〈http://www.lkeidenuniv.nl/cml/iolci/〉 (May 1, 2003).
Vignon, B. et al. (1993). “Life-cycle assessment: Inventory guidelines and principles.” Rep. No. EPA/600/R-92/245, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
Voorspools, K. R., Brouwers, E. A., and D’haeseleer, W. D.(2000). “Energy content and indirect greenhouse gas emissions embedded in ‘environ-free’ power plants: Results for the Low Countries.” Appl. Energy, 67, 307–330.
Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R., and Edmunds, J. A.(1996). “Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations.” Nature (London), 379, 240–243.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 10Issue 3September 2004
Pages: 111 - 119

History

Received: May 28, 2003
Accepted: Mar 1, 2004
Published online: Aug 16, 2004
Published in print: Sep 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

John A. Ruether
Senior Engineer, U.S. Dept. of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory, P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA 15236.
Massood Ramezan
Project Manager, SAIC, P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA 15236.
Peter C. Balash
Economist, U.S. Dept. of Energy/National Energy Technology Laboratory, P.O. Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA 15236.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share