Effectiveness of Ground Penetrating Radar in Predicting Deck Repair Quantities
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 10, Issue 2
Abstract
Ground penetrating radar (GPR) was examined as an alternative or supplement to visual inspection methods for predicting reinforced concrete bridge deck repairs. Visual inspection has frequently resulted in grossly inaccurate estimates of repairs causing large maintenance cost overruns. GPR-predicted deteriorations were compared to deterioration detected using the chain drag and half-cell potential methods on 24 asphalt covered reinforced concrete decks exhibiting a broad spectrum of deterioration levels. The differences among the deterioration quantities resulting from these surveys were normalized for comparison with respect to the deterioration area and deck size. Large proportions of all decks surveyed containing less than 10% and more than 50% deterioration of the total deck surface area (as measured by chain drag) exhibited significant differences between the GPR and both ground-truth survey quantities. Insignificant differences between GPR predictions and the ground-truth results were observed for six out of seven decks exhibiting deterioration levels between 10 and 50% (by chain drag). It is concluded from this investigation that a combination of visual inspection and GPR inspection surveys for all decks can improve repair estimates and reduce the occurrence of gross underestimates of repair quantities.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Alongi, A. J., Clemeña, G. G., and Cady, P. D. (1993). “Condition evaluation of concrete bridges relative to reinforcement corrosion, Volume 3: Method of evaluating the condition of asphalt-covered decks.” Strategic Highways Research Program, Rep. SHRP-S-325, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (1992). “Guide for making a condition survey of concrete in service.” American Concrete Institute Committee 201 “Durability of Concrete” Rep. ACI 201.1R-92.
ASTM. (1998). “Standard test method for half-cell potentials of uncoated reinforcing steel in concrete.” C-876-91, West Conshohocken, Pa., 430–435.
Barnes, C. L., and Trottier, J.-F. (2001). “A study of the effectiveness of ground penetrating radar for condition assessment of asphalt-covered reinforced concrete bridge decks in Nova Scotia.” Final Rep. to the Nova Scotia Department of Transportation and Public Works, Dalhousie Univ., Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Barnes, C. L., and Trottier, J.-F. (2002). “Phenomena and conditions in bridge decks that confound ground-penetrating radar data analysis.” Transportation Research Record 1795, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 57–61.
Maser, K. R. (1989). “New technology for bridge deck assessment, Phase I report.” Rep. No. FHWA-NETC-89-01, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Transportation Studies, Federal Highways Administration, McLean, Va.
Maser, K., and Bernhardt, M. (2000). “Statewide bridge deck survey using ground penetrating radar.” Structural Materials Technology IV, An NDT Conf., Atlantic City, N.J., 31–37.
Neville, A. M., and Brooks, J. J. (1987). Concrete technology, Longman Scientific & Technical, Longman Group UK Limited, Longman House, Burnt Mill, Harlow, Essex CM20 2JE, England, 276.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation. (1988). Structure rehabilitation manual, Bridge Management Section, Structural Office, Highway Engineering Division, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Administrative Services Offices, Lower Level, East Building, 1201 Wilson Avenue, Downsview Ont., Canada M3M 1J8.
“Perspectives on nondestructive testing.” (1996). Aberdeen’s concrete repair digest, Bimonthly supplement to Concrete Construction Magazine, The Aberdeen Group, 426 South Westgate, Addison, Ill.
Rhazi, J., and Ballivy, G. (2000). “Comparative study of NDT techniques for concrete bridge decks.” Rep. No. GR00-05-01, Report submitted to the Ministry of Transportation of Québec (in French). Department of Civil Engineering, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Qué., Canada J1K 2R1.
Romero, F. A., Roberts, G. E., and Roberts, R. L. (2000). “Evaluation of GPR bridge deck survey results used for delineation of removal/maintenance quantity boundaries on asphalt-overlaid, reinforced concrete deck.” Structural Materials Technology IV, an NDT Conf., Atlantic City, N.J., 23–30.
Spellman, D. L., and Stratfull, R. F.(1973). “Concrete variables and corrosion testing.” Highw. Res. Rec., 423, 27–45.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 10 • Issue 2 • June 2004
Pages: 69 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 16, 2001
Accepted: Sep 29, 2003
Published online: May 14, 2004
Published in print: Jun 2004
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.