TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 14, 2004

Holistic Strategy for Urban Security

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 10, Issue 2

Abstract

Since September 11, 2001, the vulnerabilities to terrorism of our urban areas, and how best to address them, have been subject to considerable discussion, debate, and reflexive defensive measures. Although direct physical responses to such frightening events are certainly understandable, they are not based on a true assessment of risk, nor do they necessarily represent an effective, let alone cost effective, approach to addressing the threat of urban terrorism. This paper will explore recent trends in physical protection and offer observations on a rational basis for evaluating security strategies; some alternative, nonstructural approaches to urban security, and the need for robust institutions with well-qualified people in critical positions to develop and implement these strategies. It will seek to demonstrate that a holistic strategy that incorporates technology, people, and institutions will achieve far greater long-term security as well as possible ancillary mitigation benefits from other hazards.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Advanced Materials and Processes Technology Information Analysis Center (AMPTIAC). (2003). “Protecting people at risk: How DoD research reduces the impact of terrorism.” The AMPTIAC Quarterly, 6(4).
American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) (2003). Report of Presidential Ad Hoc Committee for Building Health and Safety under Extraordinary Incidents on risk management guidance for health, safety, and environmental security under extraordinary incidents, Atlanta.
Carvel, R.(2002). “The history and future of fire tests.” Tunnels Tunnel. Int., 11, 34–35.
City of New York. (2003). New York City Department of Buildings World Trade Center Building Code Task Force, findings and recommendations, Dept. of Buildings, New York.
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). (2003). “Immune building program.” 〈http://www.darpa.mil/spo/programs/immunebuilding.htm〉 (Aug. 5, 2003).
Drazen, J. M.(2003). “SARS—Looking back over the first 100 days.” N. Engl. J. Med., 349(4), 319–320.
Enders, W., and Sandler, T. (2004). “What do we know about the substitution effect in transnational terrorism?” Terrorism research, A. Silke, ed., Frank Cass, London, in press.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2003a). “Reference manual to mitigate potential terrorist attacks in high occupancy buildings.” FEMA 426, Washington, D.C.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2003b). “Primer for design of new buildings to mitigate terrorist acts.” FEMA 427, Washington, D.C.
Gale, S., and Husick, L. (2003). From MAD (mutual assured destruction) to MUD (multilateral unconstrained disruption): Dealing with the new terrorism, Foreign Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.
Garrett, L. (2000). Betrayal of trust: The collapse of global public health, Hyperion, New York.
Gilbert, P., et al. (2003). “Infrastructure issues for cities—countering terrorist threat.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9(1), 44–54.
Haimes, Y. Y.(2002). “Risk of terrorism to cyber-physical and organizational-societal infrastructures.” Public Works Manage. Policy, 6(4), 231–240.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Kaplan, S., and Garrick, B. J.(1981). “On the quantitative assessment of risk.” Risk Anal., 1(1), 11–27.
Kletz, T. (2001). Learning from accidents, Gulf Professional, Oxford, U.K.
Kleindorfer, P. R., Kunreuther, H. C., and Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Decision sciences, An integrative perspective, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Klinenberg, E. (2002). Heat wave: A social autopsy of disaster in Chicago, University of Chicago, Chicago.
Krugman, P. (2001). “Paying the price.” New York Times, Sept. 16.
Langewiesche, W.(2002). “American ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center.” The Atlantic Monthly, 290(2), 44–79.
Linstone, H. (1984). Multiple perspectives for decision making: Bridging the gap between analysis and action, Elsevier, New York.
Lipton, E., and Glanz, J. (2002). “9/11 prompts new caution in skyscraper design.” N.Y. Times, Sep. 9.
Little, R. G.(1999). “Educating the infrastructure professional: A new curriculum for a new discipline.” Public Works Manage. Policy, 4(2), 93–99.
Little, R. G.(2002a). “Controlling cascading failure: Understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures.” Journal of Urban Technology, 9(1), 109–123.
Little, R. G. (2002b). “A probabilistic approach for protecting people and buildings from terrorist attack and other hazards.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Protecting Structures Against Hazards, C. I. Premiere, Singapore, 49–56.
Marburger, J. (2002). Testimony before the House Committee on Science, June 14, 2002.
Marshall, H. E. (2002). “Economic approaches to Homeland Security for constructed facilities.” Proc., 10th Joint W055-W065 Int. Symp. on Construction Innovation and Global Competitiveness, Univ. of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.
Mays, G. C., and Smith, P. D. (1995). Blast effects on buildings, Thomas Telford, London.
Mileti, D. S. (1999). Disaster by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States, Joseph Henry, Washington, D.C.
Miller, J. (2003). “U.S. is deploying a monitor system for germ attacks.” N.Y. Times, Jan. 22.
Mlakar, P. F., Dusenberry, D., Harris, J. R., Haynes, G., Phan, L., and Sozen, M. (2003). The Pentagon Building Performance Report, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). (1995). “The Hanshin-Awaji earthquake of January 17, 1995: performance of lifelines.” Technical Rep. MCEER-95-0015, Buffalo, N.Y.
Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). (2002). Proc., Workshop on Lessons Learned from the World Trade Center Attack: Management of Complex Civil Emergencies and Terrorism-Resistant Civil Engineering Design, Buffalo, N.Y.
National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (1988). Cities and their vital systems: infrastructure past, present, and future, J. H. Ausubel, and R. Herman, eds., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (1994). 1994 Northridge Earthquake: Performance of Structures, Lifelines, and Fire Protection Systems, NIST, Gaithersburg, Md.
National Research Council (NRC). (1985). Safety of dams, flood and earthquake criteria, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
National Research Council (NRC). (1994). Practical lessons from the Loma Prieta earthquake, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Blast mitigation for structures: 1999 status report on the DTRA/TSWG Program, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
National Research Council (NRC). (2002). Making the nation safer: the role of science and technology in countering terrorism, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
National Research Council (NRC). (2003). Working in Olmsted’s shadow: guidance for developing a scope of services for the update of the master plan for the U.S. Capitol and grounds, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
O’Rourke, T. D., Lembo, A. J., and Nozick, L. K. (2003). “Lessons learned from the World Trade Center disaster about critical utility systems.” Beyond September 11th: An Account of Post-Disaster Research, M. F. Myers, ed., Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
Padfield, P. (1995). War beneath the sea, Wiley, New York.
Petak, W. J. (2003). “Implementing earthquake mitigation: The context counts.” Proc., 55th Annual Meeting, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, El Orrito, Calif.
Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.
Petroski, H. (1992). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design, Vintage, New York.
Petroski, H. (1994). Design paradigms: Case histories of error and judgment in engineering, Cambridge University, Cambridge, U.K.
Rypkema, D.(2003). “The importance of downtown in the 21st century.” J. Am. Plan. Assn., 69(1), 9–15.
Schneier, B. (2003). “Locks and full disclosure.” Crypto-Gram Newsletter, 〈http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0302.html〉 (July 9, 2003).
Sevin, E., and Little, R. G.(1998). “Mitigating terrorist hazards.” The Bridge, 28(3), 3–8.
Spencer, B. F., Jr. (2002). “Smart structures technology: opportunities and challenges.” Presentation to the National Research Council Committee to Develop a Long-term Research Agenda for the Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Starr, C.(2003). “The precautionary principle versus risk analysis.” Risk Anal, 23(1), 1–3.
Tamaro, G. J.(2002). “World Trade Center ‘bathtub’: From genesis to Armageddon.” The Bridge, 32(1), 11–17.
Tierney, K. (2002). “Overview: Conceptualizing and measuring resilience for physical and organizational systems.” Proc., Workshop on Lessons Learned from the World Trade Center Attack: Management of Complex Civil Emergencies and Terrorism-Resistant Civil Engineering Design, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, N.Y., 61–63.
Wallace, W. A., Mendonca, D. M., Lee, E. E., Mitchell, J. E., and Chow, J. H. (2003). “Managing disruptions to critical interdependent infra-structures in the context of the 2001 World Trade Center attack.” Beyond September 11th: Account of Postdisaster Research, M. F. Myers, ed., Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
Wiener, J., and Rogers, M.(2002). “Comparing precaution in the U.S. and Europe.” J. Risk Res., 5(4), 317–349.
Wulf, W., Haimes, Y., and Longstaff, T.(2003). “Strategic alternative responses to risk of terrorism.” Risk Anal, 23(3), 429–444.
Zimmerman, R. (2002). “Enhancing resilience of integrated civil infrastructure systems.” Proc., Workshop on Lessons Learned from the World Trade Center Attack: Management of Complex Civil Emergencies and Terrorism-Resistant Civil Engineering Design, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, N.Y., 65–66.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 10Issue 2June 2004
Pages: 52 - 59

History

Received: Aug 14, 2003
Accepted: Dec 8, 2003
Published online: May 14, 2004
Published in print: Jun 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Richard G. Little
Director, Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, National Research Council, 500 5th St., NW, Washington, D.C. 20001.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share