TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 15, 2003

Strategies of Extended Producer Responsibility for Buildings

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 9, Issue 2

Abstract

Buildings use large amounts of materials and produce much waste. Some building materials are recycled, but most become waste. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) policies require producers to be responsible for their products after their useful life. The basic drivers of EPR are reduced pollution and resource and energy use over a product’s life cycle. For buildings, EPR provides an opportunity to divert additional waste away from landfills and into reuse and recycling. Energy shortages and pollution prevention are concerns at regional and global levels, while material shortages occur in some regions. EPR can be achieved through regulatory, economic, or information instruments. Product takeback (PTB) is a regulatory instrument that requires producers to take back products at the end of their useful life and reuse or recycle them. This paper finds that PTB policies are not feasible for entire buildings, but many building materials and components are candidates for reuse and recycling. Using recycled materials may save energy, reduce virgin material use, and prevent pollution. Economic instruments can also be used to promote EPR for buildings, while information instruments are not as effective.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Associated General Contractors (AGC). (2002). Concrete recycling facts, 〈http://www.agc.org/Environmental_Info/concrete_facts.asp〉 (May 30, 2002).
BEES (Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability) technical manual and user’s guide, version 2.0. (2000). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md.
Bolen, W. P. (2000). “Sand and gravel, construction.” 2000 U.S. Geological Survey minerals handbook, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
Bonda, P. (2000). “GSA wants you!” Green@Work, July/August.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). (2000). “National transportation statistics 2000.” Technical Rep. No. BTS01-01, Washington, D.C.
California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). (2002). “Construction and demolition debris recycling.” 〈http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/condemo/default.htm〉 (Apr. 24, 2002).
Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Initiative. (2002). “Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) model.” 〈http://www.eiolca.net/〉 (May 29, 2002).
Collins, R.(1997). “Recycled concrete.” Quarry Manage., 24(12), 31–36.
Construction Materials Recycling Association (CMRA). (2002). “Fact file C&D recycling industry.” 〈http://cdrecycling.org/history.htm〉 (May 30, 2002).
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DDNREC). (1996). “A pollution prevention guide for building construction and demolition: three Rs for the 90s: reduce, reuse, recycle.” 〈http://www.dnrec.state.de.us/del-cnst.htm〉 (May 30, 2002).
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (1997). “A look at residential energy consumption in 1997.” Rep. No. DOE/EIA-0632(97), Washington, D.C.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (1999). “Annual energy outlook 1999.” Rep. No. DOE/EIA-0554(99), Washington, D.C.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1999). “Final guidance on environmentally preferable purchasing for executive agencies.” Federal Register, 64, (No. 161; Aug. 20), 45809–45858.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2000). “Environmentally preferable purchasing: tips for buying “green” with the government credit card.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/epp/creditcard.htm〉 (May 23, 2002).
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). (2002). “Construction and demolition material recycling.” 〈www.aee.faa.gov/aee-200/dem.pdf〉 (May 30, 2002).
Fishbein, B.(2000). “Carpet take-back: EPR American style.” Environ. Qual. Manage., 10(1), 25–36.
Fishbein, B., Ehrenfeld, J., and Young, J. (2000). Extended producer responsibility: a materials policy for the 21st century, INFORM, New York.
Franklin Associates. (1998). “Characterization of building-related construction and demolition debris in the United States.” Rep. No. EPA530-R-98-010, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Franklin Associates. (1999). “Characterization of municipal solid waste in the United States: 1998 update.” Rep. No. EPA530-R-99-021, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Glass Manufacturing Industry Council (GMIC). (2002). “Glass industry roadmap.” 〈http://gmic.org/Roadmap%20Sections/glass2002roadmap. pdf〉 (April 26, 2002).
Graedel, T. E., and Klee, R. J.(2002). “Getting serious about sustainability.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(4), 523–529.
Grübl, P., Nealen, A., and Schmidt, N. (1999). “Concrete made from recycled aggregate: experiences from the building project ‘Waldspirale’.” 〈http://www.b-i-m.de/public/tudmassiv/damcon99gruebl.htm〉 (May 28, 2002).
Hanisch, C.(2000). “Is extended producer responsibility effective?” Environ. Sci. Technol., 34(7), 170A–175A.
Hendrickson, C. T., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., and Lave, L. B.(1998). “Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(4), 184A–191A
Hendrickson, C. T., Horvath, A., Lave, L. B., and McMichael, F. C.(1996). “New markets for old materials.” TR News, 184, 32–35.
Horvath, A., Debaille, C., and Pacca, S. (2002). “Recycling of concrete pavements.” Technical Rep., University of California—Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif.
Hunter, R. (1997). “E.U. to manufacturers: take back old products.” The Nat. Law J., Dec. 22, B8–B10.
Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries (ISRI). (2002). “Recycling scrap materials contributes to a better environment.” 〈http://www.isri.org/isri-downloads/rsmcbe.pdf〉 (May 23, 2002).
Interactive Learning Paradigms (ILPI). (2002). “The MSDS FAQ: introduction.” 〈http://www.ilpi.com/msds/faq/parta.html#whatis〉 (May 2, 2002).
Kazan-Allen, L. (2002). “Asbestos: properties, uses, and problems.” 〈http://www.btinternet.com/∼ibas/lka_prop.htm〉 (May 15, 2002).
Kelly, T. (1998). “Crushed cement concrete substitution for construction aggregates: a materials flow analysis.” Circular 1177, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
Levy, G. M., ed. (2000). Packaging, policy, and the environment, Aspen, Gaithersburg, Md.
Ligon, L. (2001). “Stroke of brilliance.” Natural Home, May/June, 61–62.
Lippiatt, B. C.(1999). “Selecting cost-effective green building products: BEES approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125(6), 448–455.
Los Angeles Department of Public Works (LADPW). (2000). “How to recycle construction and demolition material.” 〈www.ci.la.ca.us/SAN/srcrd/C&D/Rc&d.doc〉 (Apr. 24, 2002).
Low, M. K., and Williams, D. J. (1998). “European environmental legislation in electronics and its potential impact on Far Eastern suppliers.” Proc., 2nd Electronics Packaging Technology Conf., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 206–213.
Lueckefett, H., Orlandella, F., and Holbrook, L. (1997). “A global perspective on environmentally related product legislation and regulations.” Proc., 1997 IEEE Int. Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 88–92.
Means, R. S. (2001). Concrete and masonry cost data 2001: 19th annual edition, R. S. Means, Kingston, Mass.
Milani, B. (2001). “Building materials in a green economy.” Proc., Canadian Society for Ecological Economics Conf., McGill Univ., Montreal.
Mulder, L. (1999). “Collecting electronic waste in Europe: a Sony view.” Proc., 1999 IEEE Int. Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 244–250.
Müller, C., (2002). “Requirements on concrete for future recycling.” 〈http://www.b-i-m.de/public/ibac/mueller.htm〉 (May 28, 2002).
Nagel, C., Nilsson, J., and Boks, C. (1999). “European end-of-life systems for electrical and electronic equipment.” Proc., 1st Int. Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 197–202.
National Academy of Sciences Board on Sustainable Development (NASBSD). (1999). Our common journey, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
PRO-ACT. (1995). “A fact sheet from PRO-ACT: disposal of construction and demolition debris (continued).” 〈http://es.epa.gov/techinfo/facts/pro-fs3.html〉 (Mar. 16, 2002).
Shanoff, B. S.(1996). “Proposed recycling rules create obstacles.” World Wastes, 39(6), 14–17.
Shea, C. P.(1992). “Package recycling laws.” BioCycle, 33(6), 56–58.
Steel Recycling Institute (SRI). (2002). “A few facts about steel: North America’s #1 recycled material.” 〈http://www.recycle-steel.org/index2.html〉 (May 14, 2002).
Thorpe, B. (1999). “Strategies to promote clean production: extended producer responsibility.” 〈http://www.most.org.pl/cpa/cpb4.html〉 (Jan. 10, 2001).
U.S. Census Bureau (USCB). (1999). Statistical abstract of the U.S: 1998, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Census Bureau (USCB). (2001). “Time series of state population estimates: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2001.” 〈http://eire/census.gov/popest/data/states/populartables/table01.php〉 (Apr. 2, 2002).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2002). Mineral commodity summaries 2002, Reston, Va.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 9Issue 2June 2003
Pages: 65 - 74

History

Received: Jun 11, 2002
Accepted: Dec 13, 2002
Published online: May 15, 2003
Published in print: Jun 2003

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Angela Acree Guggemos
PhD Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1712.
Arpad Horvath, A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1712 (corresponding author).

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share