Cost/Benefits of Robotics in Infrastructure and Environmental Renewal
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 6, Issue 1
Abstract
Robotic systems have become common in many manufacturing and production operations because they have proven to be more robust, safe, efficient, accurate, and productive than the processes they replaced. These same attributes are desirable for construction operations associated with infrastructure construction and renewal and are often essential to deal with hazardous conditions commonly encountered in environmental restoration activities. This research developed a methodology for quantifying the cost payoff and provides a method to analyze the productivity of different equipment suites to meet civil and environmental engineering site conditions. This paper presents the results of applying the method to automation of full-scale construction equipment for infrastructure renewal and environmental restoration. In addition to the benefits of reduced health risks and potential deaths, use of automated construction equipment can lead to substantial savings through increased productivity and speed of cleanup when human productivity and efficiency are adversely impacted due to encumbrances from protective gear and required safety measures. This research compares traditional, human-operated systems with telerobotic and autonomous systems and provides a set of guidelines for developing future robotic equipment more economically.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AFCESA. (1995). “Ordnance and explosive waste remediation model.” Remedial Action Cost Engineering and Requirements (RACER) System, Model Manuals and Tech. Rep., Air Force Civil Engineering Support Agency, Tyndall AFB, Fla.
2.
Barrouil, C., Castel, C., Fabiani, P., Mampey, R., Secchi, P., and Tessier, C. (1998). “A perception strategy for a surveillance system,” Proc., ECAI '98, 13th Eur. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Wiley, New York.
3.
Barrouil, C., and Lemaire, J. (1998). “An integrated navigation system for a long range AUV (autonomous underwater vehicle).” Oceans '98: Engrg. for Sustainable Use of the Oceans.
4.
Burns, T., Thurston, M., and Edgar, M. H. (1995). “Case study: Using a parametric model for environmental remediation cost estimating.” Fed. Fac. Envir. J., Summer.
5.
Caterpillar performance handbook. (1991). 22nd Ed., Caterpillar, Inc., Peoria, Ill.
6.
DoD. ( 1993). “Task need statement for explosive ordnance disposal (EOD).” Defense Planning Guidance, Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., June 6.
7.
DoD. ( 1995). “Unmanned ground vehicle master plan.” Department of Defense, Washington, D.C.
8.
DRC. ( 1996). “Analysis of robotics and telerobotic systems to perform environmental remediation.” Study for U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (WL/FIVC), Niceville, Fla.
9.
Gallagher, F., and Gregory, R. A. ( 1993). “Estimation and analysis of base realignment and closure rounds I & II.” Air Force Civil Engineering Support Agency, Tyndall AFB, FL.
10.
Gregory, R. A. (1992). “Development of a knowledge-based system approach for decision making in construction projects.” AFCESA-TR-93-01, Defense Technical Information Center, Cameron Station, Alexandria, Va.
11.
Gregory, R. A., et al. ( 1993). “Remedial action cost engineering and requirements environmental estimating (RACER/ENVEST), analysis, and reporting system.” U.S. Patent Application S/N 08/051,551. AF Inv, 20918, Air Force Legal Services Agency, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.
12.
Hastak, M., and Skibniewski, M. J. (1993). “Automation potential of pipe laying operations.” J. Automation in Constr., Amsterdam.
13.
Kangari, R., and Gregory, R. (1997). “Feasibility of automating military's environmental operations.” Automation in Constr., Amsterdam.
14.
Krom, R. ( 1997). “Robots in the building industry,” Thesis Sponsored by Stichting voor de Techische Weterschappen, Utrecht (Netherlands) and Institute TNO voor Bouwmaterialen en Bouwconstructies, Delft, The Netherlands.
15.
Manual of analytical methods. (1985). 3rd Ed., National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Cincinnati.
16.
Moselhi, O., ed. (1998). Catalog of robots and automated machines in construction, Int. Assn. for Automation and Robotics in Constr. (IAARC), Concordia University, Montreal.
17.
Nease, A. D., and Alexander, E. F. (1994). “Air Force construction automation/robotics.” J. Automation in Constr., Amsterdam.
18.
OASD. (1993). “Parametric facility cost estimating, a report to Congress.” Rep., Office, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C., March 1.
19.
Safety and health requirements manual. (1992). EM 385-1-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), Washington DC.
20.
Skibniewski, M. (1988a). . Robotics in civil engineering. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, Boston, and Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
21.
Skibniewski, M. (1988b). “Framework for decision-making on implementing robotics in construction.”J. Comp. in Civ. Engrg, ASCE, 2(2), 188–201.
22.
Thurston, M., Ride, M., and Ove, T. ( 1995). “Automated cost estimating for ordnance and explosive waste remediation.” Delta Research Corp., Niceville, Fla.
23.
USACE. ( 1992). “Safety concepts and basic considerations, unexplosive ordnance.” Revision 9, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntsville Div., Huntsville, Ala.
24.
USAF WL/FIVCO. ( 1995a). “Live site advanced technology demonstration standard validation data sheet, U.S. Army Jefferson proving ground, IN.” Air Force Materiel Command, Wright Laboratories, Air Base Operability and Repair Section, Tyndall AFB, Fla., June–July.
25.
USAF WL/FIVCO. ( 1995b). “Area clearance program.” Air Force Materiel Command, Wright Laboratories, Air Base Operability and Repair Section, Tyndall AFB, Fla.
26.
USMC ( 1995). “Joint amphibious mine countermeasures.” Air Force Materiel Command, Wright Laboratories, Air Base Operability and Repair Section, U.S. Marine Corps, Tyndall AFB, Fla.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 6 • Issue 1 • March 2000
Pages: 33 - 40
History
Received: May 3, 1996
Published online: Mar 1, 2000
Published in print: Mar 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.